Author Topic: Some problems of realism and gameplay for archers  (Read 1863 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Tydeus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1422
  • Infamy: 351
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Item re-unbalance guy
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Tydeus
  • IRC nick: Tydeus
Re: Some problems of realism and gameplay for archers
« Reply #15 on: April 14, 2013, 11:38:34 pm »
+2
Get this shit out of my forum section!
chadz> i wouldnt mind seeing some penis on my character

Offline Ptolemy

  • Weeaboo
  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 257
  • Infamy: 182
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Ninja
  • Game nicks: Nomin
Re: Some problems of realism and gameplay for archers
« Reply #16 on: April 15, 2013, 12:15:42 am »
+1
Try HA before say this. Even with loomed bow , you can hit a shit with this : the crosshair is really big and I don't make any damage

No... you're just a terrible HA. I do fine with my unloomed HA.

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: Some problems of realism and gameplay for archers
« Reply #17 on: April 15, 2013, 12:26:55 am »
+1
When was the last time you did this? You know in my experience you could helicopter spin your polearm, but that wouldn't be the case any longer would it?

Few weeks back. Had 24 agility though. 18/24 lvl 30 build archer.
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline Carthan

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 612
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
  • Mad scientist and creator of QUANTUM-KAFEIN
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BlackCompany
  • Game nicks: Vandal (Carthan)
Re: Some problems of realism and gameplay for archers
« Reply #18 on: April 15, 2013, 12:27:49 am »
+1
Emh , I think I didn't wrote the right sentence : Archer can't maintain their bows drawn more than 0.5 second , I don't care about the time for draw the bow !! x)  I'm sorry for my bad english  :mrgreen:
Oh, that is different.
Yes the accuracy decreases significantly (Possibly too much) over a short duration, but I would also imagine my arms would cramp up pretty quickly and painfully if I tried it even briefly.
Yes, been posted before. Rather than practicing swinging a weapon, it would be better to go 1 hander and learn a martial art that specializes in takedowns, because that's all that really matters in that sport.

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Some problems of realism and gameplay for archers
« Reply #19 on: April 15, 2013, 12:55:50 am »
+1
Cavalry can 100% run over archers 24/7. Do you think that is balanced?

Archers can 100% trash cavalry at range 24/7. Do you think that is balanced ?

Furthermore, what you said is simply false right now. One or two stacks of arrows aren't going to slow you down enough to be hit by cav consistently.

Offline Miwiw

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 525
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: HRE
  • Game nicks: Miwiw
Re: Some problems of realism and gameplay for archers
« Reply #20 on: April 15, 2013, 01:20:18 am »
+2
Oh they do. I'm incredible slow now, but that's not the problem and I, as I said before, am fine with that. The other thing I rather doubt I was fine with, is the removing of jumping while having a bow drawn PLUS the heavy additonal weight. I don't want to shoot while jumping, I have never cared about that. But after 3 years of jumping to avoid cavalry with ANY build, this was just plain stupid today. :P
Miwiw_HRE - Two Handed
Trade with me

Offline Rumblood

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1199
  • Infamy: 420
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GrannPappy
Re: Some problems of realism and gameplay for archers
« Reply #21 on: April 15, 2013, 05:05:41 am »
+1
Archers can 100% trash cavalry at range 24/7. Do you think that is balanced ?

Furthermore, what you said is simply false right now. One or two stacks of arrows aren't going to slow you down enough to be hit by cav consistently.

Dude, I run over archers every day, all day. If they can't find cover, they are bump charge toast. Xbows? Yes, they can take out the horse with one shot before they are horse stomp jelly, but archers? They better just drop their bows and run for a pikeman.  :rolleyes:
"I don't think much of a man who is not wiser today than he was yesterday" – Abraham Lincoln

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Zaren

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 162
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Zaren_Astralis
  • IRC nick: Zaren
Re: Some problems of realism and gameplay for archers
« Reply #22 on: April 15, 2013, 08:05:33 am »
+1
When you look at historical film , archers can draw 5 seconds their bow... In cRPG , that's 0.5 secs ...  :| Second problem , kiting is a pain and that's not really realistic
are you seriously invoking realism as the way to decide classes......lol


If you really want realism then these things would have to added for archers.....
1.If a fully armored knight gets shot with a longbow, hes dead or at least maimed so bad that he flies off his horse and bleeds out.
2. Archers could kite since they are faster than your stupid FULLY PLATE builds which weigh a ton and no one can run in.
3.Any archer with a light build can basicly only do blunt damage to plate since those arrows cant penetrate especially when fired from small bows.

And for infantry
1.When you get slashed in the brain you are dead no continuation....and in the arm means u just lost that arm and cant use a 2hander effectively or can only use your shield/1hander depending on the arm hit.
2.You could swing that greatmaul probably 4 or 5 times before needing a break.
3.You would run rediculously slow or not at all in anything above chainmail.