Author Topic: War of the Birds  (Read 10934 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Blackzilla

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 451
  • Infamy: 108
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FIDLGB(strat/crpg),Dracul(Friends)
  • Game nicks: Blackzilla_FIDLGB, Helios The Shiny
  • IRC nick: Blackzilla
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #105 on: April 05, 2013, 10:42:09 pm »
-1
I didn't know Chaos promised to never attack Amere after selling it. I also thought TKoV owned Amere, not Chaos.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Krosis

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 166
  • Infamy: 42
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #106 on: April 05, 2013, 10:56:49 pm »
+1
I didn't know Chaos promised to never attack Amere after selling it. I also thought TKoV owned Amere, not Chaos.

Yeah I thought TKOV took it from Remnant..

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #107 on: April 05, 2013, 10:59:19 pm »
0
Yeah I thought TKOV took it from Remnant..

eh. Canary already said this

I sold him that fief, heh.



So, Chaos sold the fief to partyboy, then attacked him for it later. Pretty rotten thing to do.

Offline Blackzilla

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 451
  • Infamy: 108
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FIDLGB(strat/crpg),Dracul(Friends)
  • Game nicks: Blackzilla_FIDLGB, Helios The Shiny
  • IRC nick: Blackzilla
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #108 on: April 05, 2013, 11:05:32 pm »
+2
I think Canary was talking about Slezkh, I say this because he is responding to Rikthorr who just said
Like I said in a previous post, you are playing the game of spergs and Canary is one of the largest ones in the game. At least you still got your fief in the Tundra.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Krosis

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 166
  • Infamy: 42
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #109 on: April 05, 2013, 11:13:20 pm »
+1
I think Canary was talking about Slezkh, I say this because he is responding to Rikthorr who just said
Yeah this..

I remember about Amere because I believe it was one of the last fiefs TKOV attacked, I remember thinking of going over there to rape the s&d and perhaps take it before TKOV got to it... never actually did, but I don't ever remember CHAOS having it.

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #110 on: April 05, 2013, 11:15:53 pm »
-1
Well, perhaps Canary or Partyboy could clarify if Partyboy purchased Amere from Canary or not. If I misunderstood what Canary was saying earlier then I apologize for the mistake.

Offline partyboy

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 477
  • Infamy: 133
  • cRPG Player
  • BRING BACK LADDERS
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GODQUEEN_PARTYGIRL_OF_BIRD
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #111 on: April 05, 2013, 11:41:35 pm »
+8
I bought Nova Amere from Remnant and Nove Slezkh from Canary/Chaos.
Subject displays signs of antisocial behaviour
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #112 on: April 05, 2013, 11:42:54 pm »
+1
I bought Nova Amere from Remnant and Nove Slezkh from Canary/Chaos.

Ah alrighty then. My bad for misunderstanding.

Offline Krosis

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 166
  • Infamy: 42
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #113 on: April 05, 2013, 11:58:41 pm »
+1
I bought Nova Amere from Remnant and Nove Slezkh from Canary/Chaos.

My mistake as well, I guess Remnant was able to get something out of it before TKOV got it.

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #114 on: April 06, 2013, 12:26:10 am »
-3
I think Canary should join the FCC (the real one) he gave me 20 points for "shitposting" because i derided the lack of courage in a video game.  So sad.
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline Duster

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 730
  • Infamy: 89
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Mr_Pibb, Mellow_Yellowtf
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #115 on: April 06, 2013, 12:32:14 am »
+1
I think Canary should join the FCC (the real one) he gave me 20 points for "shitposting" because i derided the lack of courage in a video game.  So sad.

You mean, you shitposted and then he told you to stop shitposting? Imagine that!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #116 on: April 06, 2013, 12:37:08 am »
+2
You mean, you shitposted and then he told you to stop shitposting? Imagine that!

You realize by that very loose definition 90% of this and most threads in the diplomacy section are "shitposting."  But i guess the warning comes when it refers to a moderator or his faction.  Hence the reference to the Federal Communications Commission which used to have many issues with any thing seen as "anti-american" being not allowed.

Really doesn't matter - more amusing than anything else.  People tend to want other people muted or silenced often because deep down they feel powerless and censoring others gives a false sense of power over others.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2013, 12:40:23 am by Keshian »
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline Tanken

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1463
  • Infamy: 395
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Tanken
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #117 on: April 06, 2013, 01:20:06 am »
+4
You realize by that very loose definition 90% of this and most threads in the diplomacy section are "shitposting."  But i guess the warning comes when it refers to a moderator or his faction.  Hence the reference to the Federal Communications Commission which used to have many issues with any thing seen as "anti-american" being not allowed.

Really doesn't matter - more amusing than anything else.  People tend to want other people muted or silenced often because deep down they feel powerless and censoring others gives a false sense of power over others.

This is one of those few moments where I agree with Kesh. Warnings/Mutes and such on the Diplomacy forum seem to hardly ever follow any real set standards as to what constitutes what type of punishment. It is entirely up to the Moderator whether they want to give you a warning, and they get to decide how heavy of a % it is. Not to mention I'm sure (but not saying this is always the case) their person bias plays more into who receives and what is dealt.


Back on topic though, Birds be killin Birds, dafuq dis world dun come to?
Below is a Collection of Finalists in my Design my Avatar contest -- They all did Awesome!
Thanks to all of those who contributed.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline partyboy

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 477
  • Infamy: 133
  • cRPG Player
  • BRING BACK LADDERS
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GODQUEEN_PARTYGIRL_OF_BIRD
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #118 on: April 06, 2013, 02:55:31 am »
+2
Yo did you guys leave good stuff in the fief?  I want to make the reclaiming attempt a fuckton of exp to get me the 2.4 mil to 31

edit:  1.7 after the last battle, sorry
Subject displays signs of antisocial behaviour
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Canary

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 826
  • Infamy: 202
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
Re: War of the Birds
« Reply #119 on: April 06, 2013, 03:24:33 am »
+2
I think Canary should join the FCC (the real one) he gave me 20 points for "shitposting" because i derided the lack of courage in a video game.  So sad.

That's funny. No, I didn't. This is not the first time you called me out for the actions of another moderator, either. I would call sad the fact that you still try to harangue me every time you get a forum warning.

You realize by that very loose definition 90% of this and most threads in the diplomacy section are "shitposting."  But i guess the warning comes when it refers to a moderator or his faction.  Hence the reference to the Federal Communications Commission which used to have many issues with any thing seen as "anti-american" being not allowed.

Really doesn't matter - more amusing than anything else.  People tend to want other people muted or silenced often because deep down they feel powerless and censoring others gives a false sense of power over others.

What's really amusing is what group the moderator who did give you the warning belongs to.

Stop displaying such a persecution complex, none of the moderators or admins are "out to get you" (anymore!). I am entirely capable of refuting the bullshit you continue to spew onto this board by responding to it directly. If I give you a warning, it won't be because I disagree with the message you post.

This is one of those few moments where I agree with Kesh. Warnings/Mutes and such on the Diplomacy forum seem to hardly ever follow any real set standards as to what constitutes what type of punishment. It is entirely up to the Moderator whether they want to give you a warning, and they get to decide how heavy of a % it is. Not to mention I'm sure (but not saying this is always the case) their person bias plays more into who receives and what is dealt.

And, as tends to be typical, people in agreement with Kesh are agreeing with what he says is happening and not with the truth of what's happening. Besides which, there are set standards set up for the forums as a whole and for the diplomacy section, just because you want to continue to ignore them or disagree with them and think they suck does not mean we're moderating entirely at our personal whim. If you really think personal bias is playing a large part with who is receiving forum warnings you are not paying enough attention. Furthermore, I was briefed by the people in charge of the forums when I got the position as to how to decently assign warning levels.


I will kindly ask you all to STOP POSTING ABOUT FORUM MODERATION in the diplomacy section. It has no bearing on what is going on in strategus and I assure you the moderators are only upholding the standards of the forums here without their personal interests getting in the way.



Yo did you guys leave good stuff in the fief?  I want to make the reclaiming attempt a fuckton of exp to get me the 2.4 mil to 31

I do believe we left equipped troops in Amere, yes.