Author Topic: so....?  (Read 2655 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Adoptagoat

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 237
  • Infamy: 25
  • cRPG Player
  • Know your Goat.
    • View Profile
Re: so....?
« Reply #30 on: March 10, 2013, 11:17:02 pm »
+1
fuck.  I agree with smoothrich.  The current ladder rules are pretty lacking.
Adoptagoat: http://i.imgur.com/p5s51.gif
Voso the Worst: thats you
Adoptagoat: I know.

Offline Haboe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1090
  • Infamy: 331
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Born with a shield on my back. Difficult birth.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Haboe
Re: so....?
« Reply #31 on: March 10, 2013, 11:47:02 pm »
0
But clear, and easy to enforce...

If they just made impossible ladders (defy gravity) to crash when deployed, things would be solved by game mechanics.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Kamirane

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 217
  • Infamy: 18
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: so....?
« Reply #32 on: March 11, 2013, 03:52:03 am »
0
If there would be a leather ladder and a wooden ladder and the wooden leather touches the leather ladder, the leather ladder reconize that the wooden leather has no leather on the ladder?  :?

Offline Segd

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 845
  • Infamy: 88
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: so....?
« Reply #33 on: March 11, 2013, 05:06:04 am »
+1
So..... tell me my dear friends.... skyladders is allowed or not ??
IF no pls explain me this.....
http://zapodaj.net/7029bb0c3f1cc.bmp.html
http://zapodaj.net/933859d5a0206.bmp.html
http://zapodaj.net/ea1fb613c3761.bmp.html                       <------- this is the best.......
http://zapodaj.net/4356a7bd52ff8.bmp.html                        <------- ladders on every tower.....

IF yes.... ok .... but pls dont cry next time ("fucking greys used skyladders, ban them all") because as you know we are the best in bug this game...
We did the same at the Chalbek, Etrosq & many other battles.

Offline Jacu

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 214
  • Infamy: 78
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Jacu_the_Grey
Re: so....?
« Reply #34 on: March 11, 2013, 03:07:14 pm »
0
when everybody did this so why we cant??    we are worse or something ??

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: so....?
« Reply #35 on: March 11, 2013, 04:56:14 pm »
0
but we can agree that it is lame as hell. the common sens rule doesnt really apply

It's not just lame, it prevents the attackers from putting up ladders to the walls when a ladder is above it.

You could technically cut off access to a castle's walls (from attackers putting up ladders) to a large portion of the castle if the defenders wanted to be really gay about it.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Butan

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1713
  • Infamy: 214
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Best tincan EU
    • View Profile
Re: so....?
« Reply #36 on: March 11, 2013, 05:36:10 pm »
0
It's not just lame, it prevents the attackers from putting up ladders to the walls when a ladder is above it.

You could technically cut off access to a castle's walls (from attackers putting up ladders) to a large portion of the castle if the defenders wanted to be really gay about it.


Maybe not a large portion, due to ladders limit per map, but definitely defend critical areas; still possible to circumvent this with smart size/positionning of besieging ladders and utilisation of catapults (or just using ladders where there is no enemy ladders in the way).