Author Topic: Eternal thread about ranged  (Read 1241 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Macropus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1668
  • Infamy: 296
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Macropus
Eternal thread about ranged
« on: February 14, 2013, 01:04:32 pm »
+18
There have been several threads about different aspects of ranged playstyle and it's place in the game balance. Some of them got closed or deleted, but people still want to discuss it, so let it be a permanent thread for that.
[Feel free to whine here!]
Well, let me begin:

IMO ranged should get approximately +20-30% points for shooting. Getting valour for shooting is much harder than for being (for example) a shielder like me. And it's not about "ranged are unhonorable dicks and only shiny knights should get valour", let's skip the RP part - valour is a way of rewarding skill, and now it's just unbalanced. It's easy to prove: Bagge is much more skilled in archery than me in melee, but he still doesn't get valour as often as I do. Simple as that.

Also, did anyone think about why we have so much archers on public servers, but quite few of them on Strategus? I can't come up with any reasonable explanation.



Offline En_Dotter

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 330
  • Infamy: 97
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Quincy Clan
  • Game nicks: Main: Qunicy_En_Dotter; Alts: Guardian_En_Dotter; Guardian_Spiralle
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2013, 01:29:13 pm »
+1
I killed 6 people in one ound of battle (2 hs) and it was ~12:12 total players. Didnt get valour and i was the worm of the match... Kinda sucks. I think it takes some skillz to to kill ppl with ranged and that the kills are not team mates. ;)
Nothing is better than eternal happiness.
Eating a sandwich is better than nothing.
Therefore, eating a sandwich is better than eternal happiness.

Offline Prpavi

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1525
  • Infamy: 402
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 私 わ 変態 です
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Prpavi, Prpafeee
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2013, 01:31:01 pm »
+2
I think ranged is in for and overdue BUFF!!!1!
And now he can't play because of "common sense" and he doesn't understand how this common sense works
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline BlueKnight

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 983
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • If you run, you will only die tired...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2013, 01:46:21 pm »
+3
Also, did anyone think about why we have so much archers on public servers, but quite few of them on Strategus? I can't come up with any reasonable explanation.
Same amount of archers but moreeeee infantry and you feel like you are getting shot less. Also super heavy super armours of doooom so archers deal less damage.

It's also about spawning. Ex. if EU1 had 100 players online (:?), after those 80 (melee+cav) guys died, there would be still like ~10 archers in the end and everybody would be unhappy cuz in the end it's archurfest. During strat battles, inf keeps spawning and overall percentage of archers among people who are alive is low.

Currently EU1 is 30 vs 30 with 6-7 archers in each team and ~4-7 cav each team (approx. + depends on map).
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Skyrim UI

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2013, 01:48:55 pm »
+2
Better rewards for archers means more archers. Please no. :P
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2013, 01:51:19 pm »
+1
How is such a thread eternal ? Fix archery, no more threads.

Offline Prpavi

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1525
  • Infamy: 402
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 私 わ 変態 です
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Prpavi, Prpafeee
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2013, 01:56:47 pm »
+1
What is there to discuss, theres too much of them, xbow: the need a skill similar to PD, 100 pierce Arba gimme a break... archers: regular ones are shit loomed/high lvl ones are way too powerfull and accurate, throwers get nerfed looool!

balance has never been worse.

And now he can't play because of "common sense" and he doesn't understand how this common sense works
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Macropus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1668
  • Infamy: 296
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Macropus
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2013, 02:03:54 pm »
0
balance has never been worse.
And I think it has never been better, not perfect ofc, but still very good.
What still feels unbalanced to me is archery. Xbows have huge upkeep costs if used without enough wpf, so it's okay for me.
And yes, buff unloomed archers! I can fight decently with unloomed shielder or 2h, but on my STF archer I totally suck.
(And yes, this whole thread is about lobbying for my stf archer).

Offline jtobiasm

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 567
  • Infamy: 328
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Tobi
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2013, 02:04:01 pm »
0
archers: regular ones are shit loomed/high lvl ones are way too powerfull and accurate,

18/24 @ 30 and 18/24 @ 31,32,33,34 and 35 is what I see most of the time. How on earth are they more powerful and more accurate? They only get more athletics and power strike. Only difference between low level archers and higher ones is imo is experience. Once you get mw bow and mw arrows there is really no need to retire, meaning they'll be used to the accuracy and as 30-33 takes a long time they'll be getting better and better at archery.

tldr: Most high level archers are skilled and not just an OP class.
p.s I love you marco, a shielder who want to give archers more points. PERFECT! <3

Offline Rumblood

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1199
  • Infamy: 420
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GrannPappy
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2013, 06:32:56 pm »
0
There have been several threads about different aspects of ranged playstyle and it's place in the game balance. Some of them got closed or deleted, but people still want to discuss it, so let it be a permanent thread for that.

They didn't get closed or deleted, they got moved to the proper Game Balance discussion area, which is where this one will end up as well.  :idea:

You can't simply discuss one aspect of ranged. Either it gets addressed as a whole and with the capabilities of individual ranged classes or the effort is wasted.
"I don't think much of a man who is not wiser today than he was yesterday" – Abraham Lincoln

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Umbra

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Krems, Freak Army of Gnjus
  • Game nicks: Umbra
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #10 on: February 14, 2013, 06:34:15 pm »
+1
Buff ranged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Perverz

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 381
  • Infamy: 180
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Barabe_Perverz
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #11 on: February 14, 2013, 07:43:46 pm »
0
i totally aggre with macropus even if im cav.
BARABE:
those without the necessary properties of good in human society, coarse, vulgar and violent man, scumbags

Offline bagge

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1056
  • Infamy: 275
  • cRPG Player
  • Duke of Poland
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: bagge
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2013, 08:06:31 am »
+1
Yep, score system is max fail for ranged.
I hope you guys get some sort of sticky balls deseases and smell like my armpits, sorry excusese for nolife fucking cunts you are.

Offline Umbra

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Krems, Freak Army of Gnjus
  • Game nicks: Umbra
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2013, 11:53:24 am »
0
Score system is a win for throwers.

Source: im a thrower
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Tzar

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 996
  • Infamy: 564
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Byzantium
  • Game nicks: Byzantium_TzarOfRushYa
  • IRC nick: TZAR
Re: Eternal thread about ranged
« Reply #14 on: February 15, 2013, 12:34:22 pm »
-1
Plz use your brain.... If archers where to get as many points per shot as melee everyone could just farm valour with their pew pew...

Only Archers would get valour...

Just think about how many times u hit people as ranged compared to inf... but yes a small buff wouldnt hurt.. its really rare Ranged players gets valour.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2013, 01:13:21 pm by Tzar »
I've never played a server where people split up as much or as often as on EU1.  No wonder range is having a field day.