Author Topic: The Great NA War -Losses To date-  (Read 59290 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline oprah_winfrey

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 808
  • Infamy: 196
  • cRPG Player
  • Now look under your seat...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: JABONRA
  • Game nicks: Egan
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #30 on: February 15, 2013, 02:14:43 am »
0
Lulz, sorry we attacked your shiny armies with heavily armed and armed not wanting to waste our gear and being attackers and still lost only 20% more than defenders, lulz.

Why don't you talk about Nova Ibiran were you guys lost 30% more as defenders?

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #31 on: February 15, 2013, 02:30:51 am »
+1
Why don't you talk about Nova Ibiran were you guys lost 30% more as defenders?

Even better gambesons against plate armor and we only lost 30% more, thank you for mentioning that.  Shitty village to defend, we had half as many mercs as you guys again and we still killed that many before a short spawn rape and we got to keep all remaining troops after flags were capped.  We only brought out equal gear in the last attack on shik where we got more kills than defenders did despite the difficulties of being attackers in open fields.  Personally I think you are going to enjoy all the shiny armies we sent down this time.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2013, 02:34:08 am by Keshian »
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline oprah_winfrey

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 808
  • Infamy: 196
  • cRPG Player
  • Now look under your seat...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: JABONRA
  • Game nicks: Egan
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #32 on: February 15, 2013, 02:53:12 am »
+1
Even better gambesons against plate armor and we only lost 30% more, thank you for mentioning that.  Shitty village to defend, we had half as many mercs as you guys again and we still killed that many before a short spawn rape and we got to keep all remaining troops after flags were capped.  We only brought out equal gear in the last attack on shik where we got more kills than defenders did despite the difficulties of being attackers in open fields.  Personally I think you are going to enjoy all the shiny armies we sent down this time.

Wasn't at any of the battles, all I have to go off is the numbers. And yes personally I am going to enjoy all the shiny armies that were sent down. In my book more battles are always a positive thing.

Offline Syls

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 168
  • Infamy: 15
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Kingdom of Veluca
  • Game nicks: Syls
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #33 on: February 15, 2013, 03:21:51 am »
0
Occitan_eZink vs HoC_Lord_Soturin - Hide Details
- Battle time: 15.02., 02:02
- Battle duration: 14m36s
- Army size: 1814 vs 1600
- Battle result: 406 vs 0
- Winner: Attacker

Another battle for you Anders

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #34 on: February 15, 2013, 03:34:33 am »
0
Thanks syls, I was there so I added that one in.

I've got the list up to date for the most part. That count is current dead between the two sides. with the Blue block being down 6k(counting the 1600 ticket bug). So in reality it's a 4.5k margin.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Adoptagoat

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 237
  • Infamy: 25
  • cRPG Player
  • Know your Goat.
    • View Profile
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #35 on: February 15, 2013, 06:07:53 am »
0
Thanks for keeping track anders.  One thing though, the reality includes bugs etc, it's not like we're ever going to get those troops back.
Adoptagoat: http://i.imgur.com/p5s51.gif
Voso the Worst: thats you
Adoptagoat: I know.

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #36 on: February 15, 2013, 06:46:48 am »
0
Thanks for keeping track anders.  One thing though, the reality includes bugs etc, it's not like we're ever going to get those troops back.

Yea, but that was 1.6k troops who COULDN"T kill the enemy. had you actually had a battle, I'd assume they would have lost 800-1200 for your 1600 versus them losing nothing(ok like 5 or whatever when gate opened for end) for your 1600.

I still count the 1600 as lost but it's a special lost since both sides had the bug and you got adversely affected because of it(more than LCO).
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #37 on: February 15, 2013, 10:24:30 am »
+2
it would be pretty epic if you could see the value of each army to start and the value of equipment lost. The two fights I was in today the enemy had crazy amounts of destriers, that shit musta cost a lot.

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #38 on: February 15, 2013, 10:26:19 am »
-1
dbrookz vs SMOOTHRICH - Hide Details
- Battle time: 15.02., 09:03
- Battle duration: 58m15s
- Army size: 1532 vs 922
- Battle result: 612 vs 0
- Winner: Attacker


FCC: 920 deaths
HP: 922 deaths
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #39 on: February 15, 2013, 07:37:08 pm »
0
Added the two battles from last night.
Malta v Fimbul
and
FCC v HP

Losses up to date.
I am going to start including any minor/lesser faction that gets involved in this war. They aren't going to have their totals in the block unless  they claim to ally/join said block in their war.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Haramir

  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 200
  • Infamy: 26
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Occitan
  • Game nicks: Occitan_Haramir
  • IRC nick: Haramir
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #40 on: February 15, 2013, 08:02:00 pm »
0
Could you add the number of clan member involved on each side

Offline defodijabox

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 30
  • Infamy: 19
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Ball so hard that shit crazy
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Malta
  • Game nicks: Malta_Defodijabox_AKC, Some_Weirdo
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #41 on: February 15, 2013, 08:14:48 pm »
0
We've also had other battles

NFL_Peyton_Manning vs Malta_TECHNOKirby - Hide Details
- Battle time: 09.02., 11:07
- Battle duration: 35m03s
- Army size: 569 vs 1455
- Battle result: 0 vs 993
- Winner: Defender

Cavalieres_KaMiKaZe_JoE vs Malta_Faust_AKC - Hide Details
- Battle time: 21.01., 01:01
- Battle duration: 28m22s
- Army size: 500 vs 500
- Battle result: 0 vs 140
- Winner: Defender
No sense in nonsense when the heat is hot

Offline Rikthor

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 432
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BOARD Clan
  • Game nicks: Historian_Rikthorrr
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #42 on: February 15, 2013, 08:35:29 pm »
0
BOARD clan has had one battle if we are going back that far

Historian_Rikthorrr vs Malta_Defodijabox_AKC - Hide Details
- Battle time: 12.01., 13:12
- Battle duration: 04m20s
- Army size: 237 vs 100
- Battle result: 252 vs 44
- Winner: Attacker

(click to show/hide)
Quote from: chadz
No matter how long you guys cry - I will not give in to dumbing strategus down because some people just want battles. If all you want are battles, then play cRPG, not strat. There are other people who like advanced gameplay.

Trolololololol

Offline MURDERTRON

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1337
  • Infamy: 428
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TRUMP / WEST 2020
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #43 on: February 15, 2013, 08:42:58 pm »
0
This is a bad thread, go make your spreadsheets somewhere else.
▀█▀▒█▀█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒█▒█▀█▒▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█
▒█▒▒█▄█▒█▒█▒██▒██▒█▄█▒▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒█
▒█▒▒█▀▄▒█▄█▒█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒▄

Offline Gmnotutoo

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1387
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Space Pope of BIRD CLAN
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Unicorns
  • Game nicks: Gmnotutoo
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #44 on: February 15, 2013, 09:01:40 pm »
+1
GSKDDJSNDS Faction's losses and kills:

Ninja Kills: 892
Ninjas Killed: 342
Strat Battles Record: Undefeated
Current Army Size: Unknown (I r hide in teh shadowz.)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

THIS IS A MANLY CLAN. FOR MANLY MEN. DOING MANLY THINGS.