I love that patronizing attitude towards games and gamers from a guy who writes books about a macho monster slayer.
Not sure about patronizing. He is pretty respectful towards CDPR and says he doesn't play video games, so it's understandable he doesn't understand them.
This part seems a bit... odd, though:
"The literary merits of The Witcher games aside, the 4 million-plus sales of all games in The Witcher series must have boosted his books' profiles some what. What say you, oh humble Sapkowski?
"I believe it is the success of my books that significantly affects the popularity of the games," he returned. "That in reality, the games used this fact, as my success beat the games to the punch."
Witcher definitely did not become as popular as it is because of the books, but because of word-of-mouth about the first game, and then the second one was marketed big and also well known by gamers already, thanks to TW1.
Although I can see why he'd think that way. Would be a big step to admit that a medium he considers inferior to books is the reason he's had so much success.