Author Topic: some (now meaningless) patch statistics  (Read 2743 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mala

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 412
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« on: January 06, 2011, 04:35:33 pm »
0
Well then, i have collected some data.

(click to show/hide)

Out of 100 battles i was 54 times in the winning team.
My overall breaking chance was 57%, for a specific item ~12%, while the average round lasted 4 minutes (or better four xp/gold ticks).
So that means, in a worst case scenario i would be able to pay the upkeep for equipment worth of 8333 gold or if things are more balanced (50/50 win/loss without a winning or losing streak) for 12500 gold.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2011, 04:38:34 pm by Mala »

Offline krampe

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 29
  • Infamy: 4
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Count Palatine of the Rhine
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Pony
  • Game nicks: krampe and the moons
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2011, 04:40:41 pm »
0
Nice drawings mala ;D
Sacrum Romanum Imperium

Yeah, well you know, that's just like, your opinion, man.

Offline Thomek

  • El Director
  • OKAM Developer
  • ***
  • Renown: 1372
  • Infamy: 481
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • Ninja Guide Wiki
  • Faction: Ninja_
  • Game nicks: Ninja_Thomek
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2011, 04:43:25 pm »
0
OMG something is wrong with chadz' Calculator! (And as we all know chadz IS also known as "The Great Calculator")

Which means something is wrong with chadz the Communist! (Or the Great Communist Calculator Silent God)

He promised us 20k! Where is the money chadz!?  :o :o :o :o
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


That Thomeck-delay-kicking bussiness is like that asshole-retard dude that fucks your sister sometimes.

Offline Tai Feng

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 14
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2011, 04:46:05 pm »
0
Interesting info.

I would like to ask complainers, what's wrong with 12500 gold? That's quite good armor/equip one can constantly have, even without saving.


Just shows that some won't be happy until they're able to afford tincan every single round.
Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.

Imperial army: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4muBipy9-Q

Offline Cris

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 121
  • Infamy: 23
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Merc_Cris, Cris, TestSubject
  • IRC nick: Cris
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2011, 04:58:58 pm »
0
I think the hotpatch today will reduce upkeep cost, increase upkeep chance, and you may need to pay repair regarless of which team won (I think that if your team wins and you don't die, nothing brakes, but I could be wrong)

He posted what he is doing in this board. (I think)


12k is nothing near enough to afford a horse. A bad horse + light armor and mid tear weapon (nvm a shield) costs more than that.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Wallace

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 13
  • Infamy: 1
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: WallaceBRD
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2011, 05:04:19 pm »
0
I wasn't even a tin can and that isn't nearly enough gold.
Mid tier armor sets run well over that and you need better than mid tier to effectlively lead charges
SO YAY POINTLESS STALEMATES
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Tai Feng

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 14
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2011, 05:28:14 pm »
0

12k is nothing near enough to afford a horse. A bad horse + light armor and mid tear weapon (nvm a shield) costs more than that.

Well now you can't have a charger with plate and a nice bow the entire time.
That just shows patch works as intended.

Rouncey is 6550, so you can have that and medium armor and a weapon. A horse, any horse, right now is a huge bonus in cRPG, much more so than before when everyone was in plate. Rouncey and a light lance are 8550 - and with these two *alone* you can kill a lot if you're any decent at the game.
Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.

Imperial army: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4muBipy9-Q

Offline Spawny

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 152
  • Infamy: 27
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Templar_Spawny
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2011, 06:14:32 pm »
0
Interesting info.

I would like to ask complainers, what's wrong with 12500 gold? That's quite good armor/equip one can constantly have, even without saving.


Just shows that some won't be happy until they're able to afford tincan every single round.

My Masterwork long espada eslavona cost me 4k+5k+10k+15k to get pre-patch and right now it's valued at 11.5k. If I use it, it will leave me with 1k gold for a shield (Tier 1, maybe tier 2) and no gold for armour.
Sounds reasonable and we all know 1h weapons are so OP their wielders need to run around unarmoured to balance it.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


The problem is even if you are number 1 in NA you are still only number 467 in EU or the worst in AUS(number 17)

Offline Tai Feng

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 14
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2011, 08:25:57 pm »
0
My Masterwork long espada eslavona cost me 4k+5k+10k+15k to get pre-patch and right now it's valued at 11.5k. If I use it, it will leave me with 1k gold for a shield (Tier 1, maybe tier 2) and no gold for armour.
Sounds reasonable and we all know 1h weapons are so OP their wielders need to run around unarmoured to balance it.

In all fairness you're using top 1H sword. If 1H swords are weak as you claim that should be balanced differently, across the board. But not being able to equip a top weapon in a category the entire time is OK.
Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.

Imperial army: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4muBipy9-Q

Offline Vicious666

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 88
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player
  • becouse an image is worth a thousand words
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Vicious666_xXx
  • IRC nick: Vicious666
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2011, 08:30:10 pm »
0
new upkeep   almost as previous

chance at 4% instead 3 (+33%), upkeep from   20% to 5%(-75%), but you have it on losing and winning team (+100%) in total still 66% of what it was previously so upkeep still around 14%   

Offline Mala

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 412
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #10 on: January 07, 2011, 05:17:08 am »
0
OMG something is wrong with chadz' Calculator! (And as we all know chadz IS also known as "The Great Calculator")

Which means something is wrong with chadz the Communist! (Or the Great Communist Calculator Silent God)

He promised us 20k! Where is the money chadz!?  :o :o :o :o

Well, with a winning streak of at least 5 rounds you got over 20k.
But with the new system you should get easily over 25k.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2011, 05:26:24 am by Mala »

Offline Gnjus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1831
  • Infamy: 397
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Siktir git, pislik okçu.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Turklings
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #11 on: January 07, 2011, 09:57:42 am »
-1
Out of 100 battles i was 54 times in the winning team.

Good for you, little one. I played like 100 rounds after the patch, and i was like 85 times in the losing team.
Do you honestly think you have any sort of moral authority, Reyiz? Go genocide some more armenians and deny it ever happened, please, and stay in the middle east.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline XXTNTXX

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 10
  • Infamy: 6
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2011, 10:24:30 am »
0
I got similar results. The break chance was not as said from 3% to 4%, much higher than this. Something must be changed.

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #13 on: January 07, 2011, 11:50:55 am »
+1
In all fairness you're using top 1H sword. If 1H swords are weak as you claim that should be balanced differently, across the board. But not being able to equip a top weapon in a category the entire time is OK.

On every thread you post, you are speaking about not wearing the best equipment "the entire time".

But honestly, what's the point of changing ? What's the point of using cheap equipment and die often then switching to good equipment for a few rounds, that won't garantee anything better for you ? That's just plain stupid.

And I'm not even arguing about the attractiveness of his heirloomed weapon. Complete crazy cost for a meagle speed and damage bonus.

Offline Grey

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 72
  • Infamy: 54
  • cRPG Player
  • Hope you like arrows...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: -
Re: some (now meaningless) patch statistics
« Reply #14 on: January 07, 2011, 12:51:55 pm »
0
Does anyone know if Halfsword mode on 2h swords uses Polearms wpf, or 2h wpf?
Bamboo Bundle Bowman: 90'' draw, groups at 200 yards.