Poll

What do you want to see allowed? (see topic for explanation)

Option 1, ladders into the sky should be allowed (1 end on the ground, other in mid air)
19 (48.7%)
Option 2, only realistic ladders
20 (51.3%)

Total Members Voted: 39

Voting closed: December 24, 2012, 10:34:48 pm

Author Topic: [Rules Discussion] 1.2) Ladderplacement  (Read 636 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Haboe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1090
  • Infamy: 331
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Born with a shield on my back. Difficult birth.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Haboe
[Rules Discussion] 1.2) Ladderplacement
« on: December 19, 2012, 10:33:20 pm »
0
1.2) Ladderplacement (think skyladders)

This poll is to decide what the community wants to see allowed.
If you disagree with both options, post here and i will consider a third poll option


Option 1: allow these ladders:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Option 2: option 1 will not be allowed, use this principle:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Anything that fails by this principle is not allowed. (because it defies gravity = unrealistic)


« Last Edit: December 19, 2012, 11:00:46 pm by Haboe »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline oprah_winfrey

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 808
  • Infamy: 196
  • cRPG Player
  • Now look under your seat...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: JABONRA
  • Game nicks: Egan
Re: [Rules Discussion] 1.2) Ladderplacement
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2012, 11:07:32 pm »
+1
I voted Option 1, but I guess I should clarify that if it was coded in the game that the ladders would break/fall then I am all for it. However, It would be quite a hassle to to hear everyone complaining if it is or is not physically possible. Specifically ones that are rather close to being possible in real life.

Offline Haboe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1090
  • Infamy: 331
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Born with a shield on my back. Difficult birth.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Haboe
Re: [Rules Discussion] 1.2) Ladderplacement
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2012, 11:13:59 pm »
0
I voted Option 1, but I guess I should clarify that if it was coded in the game that the ladders would break/fall then I am all for it. However, It would be quite a hassle to to hear everyone complaining if it is or is not physically possible. Specifically ones that are rather close to being possible in real life.

Should have said it, off course meow's common sense rule applies here. It will ofc happen a lot that a ladder fails and end up slightly unrealistic.
But there is a clear line between failing a ladder with the result of it being slightly unrealistic, and massively using the mechanics of the ladders to your advantage.
If it ends up most of the community wants to be able to use the ladder the way option 1 described, that is how i will set it in the rules.

Posting this because i forgot to state meows rule in my post, but ill shut up now so i don't influence the poll any further  :mrgreen:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: [Rules Discussion] 1.2) Ladderplacement
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2012, 12:18:25 am »
0
As others have pointed out in other threads, a ladder with one end on the ground and the other in the sky isn't what cRPG dev's have typically called "sky ladders".  Their definition of sky ladders was any ladder that was built on another ladder.

But to me, and common sense, a sky ladder is any ladder with nothing holding it up (besides Warband physics)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Haboe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1090
  • Infamy: 331
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Born with a shield on my back. Difficult birth.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Haboe
Re: [Rules Discussion] 1.2) Ladderplacement
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2012, 12:25:44 am »
+1
Changed it to ladder into the sky, better?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: [Rules Discussion] 1.2) Ladderplacement
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2012, 12:49:07 am »
0
Changed it to ladder into the sky, better?

I could care less, I consider what you're talking about to be sky ladders, but some people will get caught up on the verbage
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Haboe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1090
  • Infamy: 331
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Born with a shield on my back. Difficult birth.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Haboe
Re: [Rules Discussion] 1.2) Ladderplacement
« Reply #6 on: December 25, 2012, 10:53:55 pm »
0
19 vs 20.

Undecided, discuss how we can get this settled.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Smoothrich

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1558
  • Infamy: 986
  • cRPG Player
  • #manup @bigplays
    • View Profile
Re: [Rules Discussion] 1.2) Ladderplacement
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2013, 03:43:15 pm »
+2
19 vs 20.

Undecided, discuss how we can get this settled.

the team with less admins are the ones in the wrong with any ladders (this applies to every rule)
My posting is like a katana folded 1000 times to perfection.. and the community is what keeps the edge sharp.. and bloody.  -  Me.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login