Grey Order Strat Announcement

[Thovex]

Hmm, teamviewer seems kind of easy to abuse, you can let your PC and you can set a password/id that will stay permanently.
You can even control it with your mobile phone. Are you sure that teamviewer is trackable though?

Because it seems kind of easy way to get around with almost no effort, plus I think the connection would be through the PC that is doing it, it's just someone else controlling the cursor.

[dynamike]

without UIF EU side of map will be too big

And thus the rise of power for NA strat begins...

[Falka]

In my opinion removing their characters form strategus and maybe few weeks ban would be enough... but banning their accounts permanently is way too harsh as in most of the cases their main guilt was their lazyness...  .
Over a month has passed, in my opionion it is more then enough so I kindly ask for unbanning whose guys that were banned for account sharing. I think they learned their lesson.

This!

We never cheated

But I have 3 accounts in strat. But we never cheated... 

[dodnet]

Hmm, teamviewer seems kind of easy to abuse, you can let your PC and you can set a password/id that will stay permanently.
You can even control it with your mobile phone. Are you sure that teamviewer is trackable though?

You know that there are hundreds of similar programs like that (netviewer, pcvisit...) that are used by computer administrators all over the world for years? Even windows has a build-in function called remote desktop. So here is my suggestion: Lets make it bannable if someone uses the Internet while playing Strategus! Its the only way! 

The grey order popping up with a Teamviewer accusation is just LOL.

[Zlisch_The_Butcher]

But I have 3 accounts in strat. But we never cheated... 

Sigged.

[Haboe]

But I have 3 accounts in strat. But we never cheated... 

For real? Seems you run out of sensible things to say or are you completely clueless about that topic?

[Zlisch_The_Butcher]

For real? Seems you run out of sensible things to say or are you completely clueless about that topic?

You're the clueless one, personally never seen his sons account in strat, but I have seen gingerpussy and his wife, they're always online at the exact same times.

[Segd]

The second tool is called “Teamviewer”. It gives you exactly the same as accountsharing, but in non-traceable manner, and on more massive scale. It provides ability to control clanmates computers, multiple at the same time, and even ability to wake up the computer if necessary.  That allowed for management of other clanmate’s accounts directly on his/her computer.

http://www.teamviewer.com/en/index.aspx

Now we know 4 possibilities to use multiaccs & accountsharing & never get banned:
1)Different IP(login from work\friends\second or third provider) multiaccs
2)Wife\kid\dog\grandma etc.  (they could even exist) multiaccs
3)Proxy or Tor  (it is suspicious but not 100% clear cheating) multiaccs or accountsharing
4)teamviewer & other similar tools accountsharing

Seriously, chadz, the only way to counter illegal multiacc is to make it legal completely or partially(like playing Strat battles with alt. chars or moving your clanmates on Strat map for some cost(strat. ticks))

[CrazyCracka420]

The only reason anti-UIF was set up was to counter the largest alliance of about 10 clans, we all said before strat 4 started we would rather fight between ourselves but it would be useless as one by one we would be picked off by the UIF and thus a creation f a mega alliance our side. All i can say is that strat will now become interesting with all clans battling with each other in many small alliances rathe 2 big ones.

Maybe a time to see if the UIF were the ones who made strat boring.

One can only hope.  It would be nice to see more than 2 "coalitions" of factions.  It seems it always dissolves into the whole map taking one side or the others.  Strategus would be much better if there were 5 or 6 factions fighting for territory like in native (rather than 10-20 factions and only 2 sides in every conflict).

[Noctivagant]

One can only hope.  It would be nice to see more than 2 "coalitions" of factions.  It seems it always dissolves into the whole map taking one side or the others.  Strategus would be much better if there were 5 or 6 factions fighting for territory like in native (rather than 10-20 factions and only 2 sides in every conflict).

no more uif = no more anti uif

I can assure you.

[Idzo]

Seriously, chadz, the only way to counter illegal multiacc is to make it legal completely or partially(like playing Strat battles with alt. chars or moving your clanmates on Strat map for some cost(strat. ticks))

Not sure to +1-it or laugh...

[serr]

no more uif = no more anti uif

I can assure you.

No doubts here, there will be no peace in Calradia:) The question is will another two big alliances form or there will be a lot of small wars between separate factions/small groups.

[Haboe]

no more uif = no more anti uif

I can assure you.

At last strat might become surprising again... no longer 1 blok vs 1 blok, and with all the fiefs that get available small clans will have the time of their life. Strat as intended, one step closer today.

[dodnet]

At last strat might become surprising again... no longer 1 blok vs 1 blok, and with all the fiefs that get available small clans will have the time of their life. Strat as intended, one step closer today.

Yeah sure... and somewhere out of nowhere a clan "White Bear" will appear with one quadrillion members and no one knows where the hell they come from. Of course ALL of these members are legally individuals! 

[KaMiKaZe_JoE]

gf

cav nerfed,
I approved, JoE