Author Topic: The Siege of Yruma Castle  (Read 6324 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Elindor

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1178
  • Infamy: 158
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Caelitus mihi vires
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Order of the Holy Guard
  • Game nicks: Elindor
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #30 on: November 08, 2012, 03:22:35 pm »
+3
Fun siege, good times all around I hope.


Another easy win for the mega NA alliance.

Thought that was Hosp + KUTT
« Last Edit: November 08, 2012, 03:26:47 pm by Elindor »
Elindor, Archon of the Holy Guard
Holy Guard Thread :HERE
Banner Shop : HERE // Map Thread : HERE

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #31 on: November 08, 2012, 04:28:42 pm »
+4
Thought that was Hosp + KUTT

If you listen to the rhetoric. That alliance at founding was only the same size as VE. Hosp/Kutt are fighting over 200 people(between all the clans) with there roughly 70.(90 at most) They are outnumbered 2:1.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Dexxtaa

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1268
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Remnant_Dexxtaa
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #32 on: November 08, 2012, 04:45:39 pm »
+3
If you listen to the rhetoric. That alliance at founding was only the same size as VE. Hosp/Kutt are fighting over 200 people(between all the clans) with there roughly 70.(90 at most) They are outnumbered 2:1.

WELL I GUESS TOE STEPPING POLICY FINALLY COMES TO A HEAD.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Pentecost

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 313
  • Infamy: 32
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #33 on: November 08, 2012, 05:23:56 pm »
0
If you listen to the rhetoric. That alliance at founding was only the same size as VE. Hosp/Kutt are fighting over 200 people(between all the clans) with there roughly 70.(90 at most) They are outnumbered 2:1.

They are outnumbered 2:1 now, maybe. But whose fault is that? There was nothing necessary or inevitable about the official Hospitaller/KUTT alliance having to fight against VE, FCC, Norse Horde, Remnant, Fallen, DL, and Teutonics together, despite the fact that all of these factions are, for the most part, working independently of each other.

Offline Malaclypse

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 146
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.
    • View Profile
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #34 on: November 08, 2012, 05:43:07 pm »
+8
Well, last night was a really unfortunate time to be wrongfully globally banned.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2012, 05:57:48 pm by Malaclypse »
You think you're pretty smart with your dago mustache and your greasy hair.

Offline Turboflex

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 648
  • Infamy: 212
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Ravens of Valhalla
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #35 on: November 08, 2012, 05:53:50 pm »
0
On paper KUTT vs FCC should have been relatively even. KUTT's laughably bad organization resulted in an instant collapse of their rotten house as soon as the door was kicked in. That weakness encouraged a pile-on from Remnants & Fallen to swoop in and pick apart the pieces.

Hospitaller on the other hand actually is organized and holding out well. After some initial setbacks due to a poorly conceived adventure in the desert, they seemed have stabilized with a solid defensive position around their core territory...

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #36 on: November 08, 2012, 06:24:19 pm »
0
They are outnumbered 2:1 now, maybe. But whose fault is that? There was nothing necessary or inevitable about the official Hospitaller/KUTT alliance having to fight against VE, FCC, Norse Horde, Remnant, Fallen, DL, and Teutonics together, despite the fact that all of these factions are, for the most part, working independently of each other.

I'm not DL I'm one of 3. Plus if DL was at war, I doubt they'd be hiring me up.
Also don't confuse Military Contract(IE Merc Army) for war declarations.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #37 on: November 08, 2012, 06:25:11 pm »
+1
Also don't confuse Military Contract(IE Merc Army) for war declarations.
Most clans do confuse the two. *shrugs*
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline oprah_winfrey

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 808
  • Infamy: 196
  • cRPG Player
  • Now look under your seat...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: JABONRA
  • Game nicks: Egan
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #38 on: November 08, 2012, 06:32:37 pm »
0
Sure wish I didn't go to bed at 9:00 est last night and miss the battle :/

Well, last night was a really unfortunate time to be wrongfully globally banned.

Why are you global banned?


Offline Malaclypse

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 146
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.
    • View Profile
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #39 on: November 08, 2012, 07:35:29 pm »
0
Sure wish I didn't go to bed at 9:00 est last night and miss the battle :/

Why are you global banned?

It's revoked now, and it was only for Strategus; Meow helped me clear it up pretty fast. Something to do with the whole Pale Horsemen, follow-up scans (Rhalzo is literally my neighbor, so he was often logged on at my place either on my computer or via mobile app).
You think you're pretty smart with your dago mustache and your greasy hair.

Offline Lemmy_Winks

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 241
  • Infamy: 230
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Lemmy_Winks
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #40 on: November 08, 2012, 09:00:48 pm »
+3
On paper KUTT vs FCC should have been relatively even. KUTT's laughably bad organization resulted in an instant collapse of their rotten house as soon as the door was kicked in. That weakness encouraged a pile-on from Remnants & Fallen to swoop in and pick apart the pieces.

Hospitaller on the other hand actually is organized and holding out well. After some initial setbacks due to a poorly conceived adventure in the desert, they seemed have stabilized with a solid defensive position around their core territory...

In regaurds to Kutt i think the thing alot of people tend to forget is that even though they were a big powerful and organized (or so people thought given their organization in seige server) clan going into this strat, they where still a new clan with no real strat experience (Having 1 village in strat 3 and fighitng 1 real battle in said village doesnt count for much). Given their lack of experience they where at a big disadvantage going up against a very experienced clan like the FCC. I dont alaways agree with the FCC, but even i can admit that their leadership has a lot more strat/political savvy than Tanken does (no offense) and so far in this strat they aren't missing a beat.

Edit: id also project the FCC to win strat 4 for NA, given that chadz seems to define winning strat more or less by which faction on EU and NA own the most fiefs once strat is over. Unless VE makes a big land grab to surpass FCC. Or if the two factions go to war, but that is about as likley to happen as Mitt romney winning the election (yes i know he already lost making it impossible).

http://forum.meleegaming.com/announcements/strategus-round-4-starting-sunday-1200-cet/
« Last Edit: November 08, 2012, 09:20:57 pm by Lemmy_Winks »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline LordBerenger

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1492
  • Infamy: 859
  • cRPG Player
  • Jesus is the savior of Earth
    • View Profile
    • .........
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #41 on: November 08, 2012, 09:13:08 pm »
+2
So north winter snow area just gonna turn into a big clusterfuck with different clans holding fiefs around or will someone go Donald Trump on em?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Emotion

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 360
  • Infamy: 145
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • pls
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Friends with Benefits
  • Game nicks: Noodles
  • IRC nick: Noodles
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #42 on: November 08, 2012, 11:02:42 pm »
0
Fun siege, good times all around I hope.


Thought that was Hosp + KUTT

If you listen to the rhetoric. That alliance at founding was only the same size as VE. Hosp/Kutt are fighting over 200 people(between all the clans) with there roughly 70.(90 at most) They are outnumbered 2:1.

They are outnumbered 2:1 now, maybe. But whose fault is that? There was nothing necessary or inevitable about the official Hospitaller/KUTT alliance having to fight against VE, FCC, Norse Horde, Remnant, Fallen, DL, and Teutonics together, despite the fact that all of these factions are, for the most part, working independently of each other.

Don't forget Astralis, Chev, Malta, and various other minor clans. Most dropped off the cliff or said fuck you Hosp.
Quote from: Testicleez
Noodles (Nibbles): One of my top dawgs. A godly c-rpg player and a chill ass muhfucka'. He's supposed to be adopting me once he gets married. One day I'll get him to order me a pizza… One day.

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #43 on: November 08, 2012, 11:49:17 pm »
0
Don't forget Astralis, Chev, Malta, and various other minor clans. Most dropped off the cliff or said fuck you Hosp.

None of those clans are allied to Hosp. At best it's mainly just trade deals and merc agreements.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Weewum

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 159
  • Infamy: 124
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: The Siege of Yruma Castle
« Reply #44 on: November 09, 2012, 12:21:32 am »
0
Bigger Hosp bandwagon please.