Poll

What would you like ?

Add option for leaders to control all members
13 (22.4%)
Change nothing viva la cheating.
8 (13.8%)
incorporate some security
10 (17.2%)
Harsh validation to join Strategus.
10 (17.2%)
Quit Strategus
17 (29.3%)

Total Members Voted: 57

Voting closed: November 09, 2012, 11:10:20 am

Author Topic: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.  (Read 2422 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gingerpussy

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 251
  • Infamy: 224
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Gingerpussy
POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« on: November 04, 2012, 11:08:16 am »
-5
Hello all.

Due to the latest days bans and forum post i wish to propose a security system for strategus.

There are what about 1000 active players in strategus ? or thereabouts ?

I would like a manual or automatic system to prevent multi accounting. meaning you have to prove that you are who you are and that you sister is actually playing strategus.

How can this be done.

1. Send in ID
2. Information about you IP (static or not)
3. Photos
4. Check if they play the same time from the same IP
5. whatever you can imagine.



So it eight er this or let the leaders controls all in strategus so that the cheaters don't get a advantage.

If a leader can control partly another member via rank system that would be the best.

Or if the cheaters still here then Quit this shit.


PS ! i am still laughing at the Polish teacher story... word...
« Last Edit: November 04, 2012, 11:12:17 am by Gingerpussy »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2012, 11:19:30 am »
0
Leader option to control all members, but it drains from the member 50 ticks to be controlled.
Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)

Offline dodnet

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 595
  • Infamy: 149
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Wolpertinger
  • Game nicks: DoD, DoD_Wolper
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2012, 11:25:11 am »
+1
Leader option to control all members, but it drains from the member 50 ticks to be controlled.

Yeah, great idea... that calls for multiaccounting by design.  :lol:

3. Photos

How should that prevent anyone from multiaccounting? I just send photos of 100 random friends and now have 100 accounts?  :mrgreen:
The logic of war seems to be that if a belligerent can fight he will fight.

(click to show/hide)

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2012, 11:36:25 am »
+2
Yeah, great idea... that calls for multiaccounting by design.  :lol:

You know 50 ticks takes along time to aquire? Thats also per log in as a "controller". So to effectively control a second account I would require lets say 5 log in times a day, thats 250 ticks in total.
I personally play above this average line on the stats graph and i struggle to maintain over 1000 ticks on my main. Meaning someone could only control my account effectivily for about 4 days, altho I am also bleeding 2 ticks an hour to recruit troops or grind gold so lets call it 3 3/4.

Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)

Offline Gingerpussy

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 251
  • Infamy: 224
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Gingerpussy
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2012, 11:42:29 am »
+1
Yeah, great idea... that calls for multiaccounting by design.  :lol:

How should that prevent anyone from multiaccounting? I just send photos of 100 random friends and now have 100 accounts?  :mrgreen:
You dont have 100 friends that are willing to give you there ID ,Phone nr, facebook profil and so on and play and talk to the one in charge of validating.

but best option is leaders to control, then multiaccounting is a waste.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Thovex

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Thovex
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2012, 11:44:08 am »
+11
You dont have 100 friends that are willing to give you there ID ,Phone nr, facebook profil and so on and play and talk to the one in charge of validating.

but best option is leaders to control, then multiaccounting is a waste.

I'm not sure if I feel like giving my ID, Phone, Facebook or whatever just to play strategus.

Just my opinion.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline BASNAK

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1349
  • Infamy: 170
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: MolonLave_Garlic
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2012, 11:54:04 am »
+2
I'm not sure if I feel like giving my ID, Phone, Facebook or whatever just to play strategus.

Just my opinion.

This. I think the idea is too far fetched. Don't think many would hand out their information to a mod crew.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Mongolista

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 162
  • Infamy: 68
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Quincy
  • Game nicks: Guardian_Bethrezen, Quincy_Mongo
  • IRC nick: Bethrezen
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2012, 11:59:36 am »
+3
why photos and IDs? I know most of you are 7year old girls anyway

NI!
(click to show/hide)

Offline dodnet

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 595
  • Infamy: 149
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Wolpertinger
  • Game nicks: DoD, DoD_Wolper
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2012, 12:10:22 pm »
+2
I'm not sure if I feel like giving my ID, Phone, Facebook or whatever just to play strategus.

I'm not willing to give all these informations either!

but best option is leaders to control, then multiaccounting is a waste.

Please explain me how this prevents multiaccounting? Create a clan with 20 fake accounts and have ONE leader control them all with ease? In my opinion this calls for multiaccounting even more!
The logic of war seems to be that if a belligerent can fight he will fight.

(click to show/hide)

Offline Osiris

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1449
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Merc
  • Game nicks: Osiris. Aethelstan
  • IRC nick: _Osiris_
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2012, 12:39:43 pm »
+3
are you insane? sending in photos and shit to play strat or just legalize cheating.. great choices ^^
i make terrible warband videos! https://youtu.be/jUdVGIOuULk

Offline Miwiw

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 525
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: HRE
  • Game nicks: Miwiw
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2012, 01:00:16 pm »
+2
I'm not sure if I feel like giving my ID, Phone, Facebook or whatever just to play strategus.

Just my opinion.

Then I rather do not play Strat when that's a "must have". Sometimes there are just stupid ideas on this forums.
Miwiw_HRE - Two Handed
Trade with me

Offline Gingerpussy

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 251
  • Infamy: 224
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Gingerpussy
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2012, 01:14:16 pm »
+1
Well i gave a option for my WIFE ! when she got banned to do this to prove her legit.

And still alot make comments on her !!! and when i ask you to do same the normal player are not willing to give this info.

Take some time and think on that.

I agree i think the greys Union and Drz now are buying more accounts maybe play them a little 2.
So it wont take problem away but make it harder for them.



visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Pejlaen

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 297
  • Infamy: 74
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Pejlaen
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2012, 01:20:14 pm »
0
People could also not Multiaccount, and dont support those that are. That might help the problem
skilled individuals, putting them together can create a very deadly and effective team.

The bow, it represents, that a skilled archer can pick a mighty man at arms off from a distance.

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #13 on: November 04, 2012, 01:32:12 pm »
+1
Well i gave a option for my WIFE ! when she got banned to do this to prove her legit.

And still alot make comments on her !!! and when i ask you to do same the normal player are not willing to give this info.

Take some time and think on that.

I agree i think the greys Union and Drz now are buying more accounts maybe play them a little 2.
So it wont take problem away but make it harder for them.

Ginger the problem with your "wife" is everytime i see you two playing together one of you always commits auto sucide at the round start by using auto foward run (t key) and the other then plays a real round. Never actually seen you both "playing" a real round together. If you wanted to know the truth why people dont believe you, their it is laid bare on the table.
Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)

Offline Gingerpussy

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 251
  • Infamy: 224
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Gingerpussy
Re: POLL ! Wanted security in Strategus.
« Reply #14 on: November 04, 2012, 01:36:38 pm »
-5
Ginger the problem with your "wife" is everytime i see you two playing together one of you always commits auto sucide at the round start by using auto foward run (t key) and the other then plays a real round. Never actually seen you both "playing" a real round together. If you wanted to know the truth why people dont believe you, their it is laid bare on the table.
GO FUCK URSELF U FUCKING IDIOT

Me or Kittiya NEVER auto run

How fucking low are u MOTHERFUCKER ???

I dont care if i get banned from this forum, BUT U NEVER lie about me or my Wife u FUCTARD!!!

Is that what Nords are now ? Trying to get me banned Andswaru ? 

Dont like the truth ?

PS! me and kittiya plays alot together she even played the two or three month i was away.


OHH ask Gurnisson he was on TS last night, as many nights before, he had to hear kittiya in background of my TS !!! as do the Spys in mercs TS
« Last Edit: November 04, 2012, 01:41:29 pm by Gingerpussy »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login