NA Siege is Dying

[slimpyman]

I don't think anyone looks at it, ya know, being cRPG and all.
But yeah, a few selective players who are on siege a lot should have permissions to change the map.

heck yeah. id trust you to change maps.   would you trust me to change the maps? id pick one with a 12 foot thick wall to stab through *end sarcasm*

[Arathian]

Well, I play(ed) a ton of siege.

If somebody is going to pick maps, just make sure you pick maps that need to be actually defended all the way. What I mean by that is that, to win, defenders should have to defend many points in the map instead of being able to just camp flag and win that way.

[Bronto]

Just go play EU siege. I did today and it was awsome! 97 people on the server which is so much more than NA siege has had. two summers ago NA siege was the same, now people care too much about their kdrs on NA to play anything but battle.

[Froto_the_Loc]

Just go play EU siege. I did today and it was awsome! 97 people on the server which is so much more than NA siege has had. two summers ago NA siege was the same, now people care too much about their kdrs on NA to play anything but battle.

K:D isn't recorded on Siege.
So if you have a 0:0, you can't really be called bad or good.

[Bronto]

K:D isn't recorded on Siege.
So if you have a 0:0, you can't really be called bad or good.

thank you for elaborating on my post so it's moron proof, but yes this is what I mean.

[Phew]

Unfortunately, it's easier to maintain a high multiplier on siege by hunting peasants/archers on the walls (away from flag) for valor than actually focusing on the objective. I played EU siege yesterday (with mostly NA folks on, since NA siege was down), and everyone was on my case for not fighting at flag. I feel their pain, but slaughtering archers all round with x5 beats watching grass grow at the flag with x1.

On siege, valor should be objective-based.

[Carthan]

Logged on today, looked at servers
Eu_2  120/120
Na_2    0/120