Author Topic: Big Fat Balance Recommendation  (Read 2548 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Xol!

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 428
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
  • Game nicks: Xol_of_Chaos
  • IRC nick: Xol
Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« on: October 27, 2012, 04:42:00 pm »
+7
I'm putting this in General Discussion primarily in response to threads like this and this.  I've thought about these changes quite a bit since coming back to the mod a couple months ago.  I've leveled 5 different alts to 30, which, along with my level 33 main, would be affected by these changes (Alts: archer, lancer, long spear, 1h, HX.  Main: 2h cav).

1) Remove couching from heavy lance/lance/light lance.  Raise destrier & armored horse minimum riding to 6.  While we're at it, change the palfrey to 100 health, 20 armor, 22 charge, and make it minimum 5 riding.

2) Remove weapon proficiency points per level.  Remove movement speed bonus per point of agility, buff athletics instead.  Add 11 weapon proficiency points per point of agility (~100 wpf at 18 agility). Reduces archer kiting ability and reduces the effectiveness of 30+ strength hiltslashing/facestabbing builds.

3) Remove the 1 health point bonus per point of strength, add 2-3 health points per point of ironflesh. (And possibly buff base health by ~10 points).

4) Revert anti-spinstab turn speed and active animation change.  I hate getting spinstabbed as much as the next guy, but the instastabs and overhead turn nerf (see lolstabs, hoplites) are much, much worse for infantry balance.  I appreciate the attempt, but sometimes changes just don't work out, and need to be reversed.

5) Remove wpf penalty per point of power throw/draw over the amount required to use a weapon.  This would allow variety back into archer/thrower builds.  Yes, less powerful versions of the ICBM war bows might come back, but I'd rather fight one of those that can't run away forever.  As a side bonus, it would fix this.

6) Here's my take on greatsword balance.  The numbers can change, but more or less make the Danish & German slower, heavier hitting, and more differentiated (danish cuttier, german stabbier).  Tweak the Great Sword, Sword of War, and Highland to be better balanced with other weapon classes.  Give the heavy greatsword a niche to fill, between the Sword of War and the Two Handed Sword. If implemented, all affected looms would probably need to be refunded:
NameCutPierceSpeed
Danish42(+2)23(-1)90(-2)
German36(-2)28(+2)90(-2)
Sword of War40(+0)22(-1)92(-1)
Great Sword36(-1)26(+0)92(-1)
Highland Claymore43(+0)22(+0)91(-1)
Heavy Great Sword38(-1)22(-1)93(+1)

7) Increase game speed setting (or heavily buff melee weapon speeds across the board, including the great swords I just listed, if server rates are a problem).
« Last Edit: October 29, 2012, 04:41:22 pm by Xolvern »
boop

Offline Moncho

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1127
  • Infamy: 221
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Moncho, Some_Random_STF, Some_Random_Troll
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2012, 05:07:36 pm »
+1
1) Alright the first part, did not notice the rest. Do not know enough about horses to speak about the last bits.
2) The devs mentioned modifying the wpf curve, so it would depend on how they do it, this might not be necessary
3) Not sure about this, I for one have never had IF. Numbers (with +3, not +2):
It would not affect builds with full IF (-3 from STR, +3 from IF), but it would be a big nerf to non IF builds.
eg: 15 str would need 3 IF to compensate, with 20 str 4, 30 str 6. Ok, does not sound too bad with +3 points
With +2 points, 20 str would need 10 str (impossible), so I would not suggest it, as it would nerf everyone.
4)Not sure, I do not like either
5) I do not think this is a good idea, pure archers would just become even more powerful and keep kiting. This has a simple reasoning: In the beginning, melee was ultra fun, but after playing for a while they realised that hey, I can go pure and not have to risk my skin, just run... This mentality would not change. Also, if you do this, you should do it in a way that every single wpf is worth less, otherwise they would become much more powerful (maybe lowering it a bit from the required one now, not sure).
6) Do not know enough about the greatswords to say about this
« Last Edit: October 27, 2012, 05:43:20 pm by Moncho »

Offline SHinOCk

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 369
  • Infamy: 58
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Is that all you've got!?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: 1%
  • Game nicks: Occitan_SHinOCk, Occitan_Baz, Derp_In_A_Can, Disease_Infested_Cum_Bucket, The_Long_Dick_Of_The_Law
  • IRC nick: SHinOCk
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2012, 05:11:42 pm »
+1
I like where you are going with most of what you propose but i don't like anything that would slow the combat of this mod even more like the 100 wpf at 18 agi and especially the speed nerf for the greatswords
While you burn at the stake, i dance with the flames

Offline Xol!

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 428
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
  • Game nicks: Xol_of_Chaos
  • IRC nick: Xol
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2012, 05:26:37 pm »
0
1) Alright
2) The devs mentioned modifying the wpf curve, so it would depend on how they do it, this might not be necessary
3) Not sure about this, I for one have never had IF. Numbers (with +3, not +2):
It would not affect builds with full IF (-3 from STR, +3 from IF), but it would be a big nerf to non IF builds.
eg: 15 str would need 3 IF to compensate, with 20 str 4, 30 str 6. Ok, does not sound too bad with +3 points
With +2 points, 20 str would need 10 str (impossible), so I would not suggest it, as it would nerf everyone.
3 (2nd 3, the spinstab one) Not sure, I do not like either
4) I do not think this is a good idea, pure archers would just become even more powerful and keep kiting. This has a simple reasoning: In the beginning, melee was ultra fun, but after playing for a while they realised that hey, I can go pure and not have to risk my skin, just run... This mentality would not change. Also, if you do this, you should do it in a way that every single wpf is worth less, otherwise they would become much more powerful (maybe lowering it a bit from the required one now, not sure).
5) Do not know enough about the greatswords to say about this

Whoops, didn't see there were two number threes, I fixed it.  For the archer/thrower change, I really think the solution is to make higher strength archery builds more attractive.  Right now, the most efficient archer builds take exactly enough power draw to use the weapon they want, because the damage and accuracy they gain from the extra weapon master is at least as good as the extra damage from power draw after taking the wpf cost into account.  Anyone going over 18 strength as an archer is doing something very wrong.  Unfortunately, with such high agility, it is relatively trivial to stack tons of athletics, and with cloth armor and the agility movement speed bonus, catching archers as a medium armor melee character is like hunting deer with a baseball bat.  My 18/24 6 PD 8 WM 3 Ath archer routinely outruns people.

I like where you are going with most of what you propose but i don't like anything that would slow the combat of this mod even more like the 100 wpf at 18 agi and especially the speed nerf for the greatswords

Oh, trust me I would sacrifice my main for crpg to have a higher game speed setting.  However, I feel like a big part of the stagnant melee play is from the overhead and stab changes.  Overhead attacks are generally not worth the risk because one can sidestep them so easily, and backpedaling is just way too effective with the quick stab animation.  I can even see bufffing athletics for extra movement speed, if reverting the animations proved not to be enough to make melee interesting.  As far as weapon proficiency goes, it really has very, very little effect on animation speed. Walt_F4 did a big series of tests awhile ago, and a 50 wpf difference only gave a swing speed change on the order of milliseconds.  The larger part of the nerf would be the damage penalty high strength builds would suffer for ignoring weapon proficiency, leading to less hiltslashing (ie, not glancing even when they strike at the very beginning of the animation).  With regards to the great sword changes, they either need to get nerfed or everything else needs to get buffed.  I would prefer the latter, but sadly the former is simpler.
boop

Offline Digglez

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 573
  • Infamy: 596
  • cRPG Player
  • YOU INCOMPETENT TOH'PAH!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Northmen
  • Game nicks: GotLander, Hamarr, Digglesan, Black_D34th
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2012, 05:42:18 pm »
-1
Quote
1)Raise destrier & armored horse minimum riding to 6.  While we're at it, change the palfrey to 100 health, 14 armor, and make it minimum 5 riding.
What do destriers have to do with cav balance?  If you didnt notice all the lancer cav are using coursers, arabs or the heavier armored horses.  Actually destrier should go back down to 4 and warhorse/large warhorse should stay at 5.  Raise cata/mamluk to 6.

Quote
3) Remove the 1 health point bonus per point of strength, add 2-3 health points per point of ironflesh.
Why not just increase base health as well?

Quote
4) Revert anti-spinstab turn speed and active animation change.  I hate getting spinstabbed as much as the next guy, but the instastabs and overhead turn nerf (see lolstabs, hoplites) are much, much worse for infantry balance.  I appreciate the attempt, but sometimes changes just don't work out, and need to be reversed.
Uh sorry no.  2h Lolstab already accounts for probably half of all 2h damage, and now you wanna revert it back to its even MORE overpowered poke and turn state?  No thanks. 

Quote
5) Remove wpf penalty per point of power throw/draw over the amount required to use a weapon.  This would allow variety back into archer/thrower builds.  Yes, less powerful versions of the ICBM war bows might come back, but I'd rather fight one of those that can't run away forever.

This is going to make every single archer into legolas, laying down uzi rate of fire but with pinpoint accuracy.  Unless youa re going to also revert longbows to the only way to do PIERCE dmg as archer, no thanks.  And if you hate throwers right now, just wait til every shielder is carrying a stack of throwing with SUPERB accuracy.  As it stands right now, hybrid throwers are actually fairly skilled based having to use prediction/anticipation to actually hit moving/dodging targets.

Offline Xol!

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 428
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
  • Game nicks: Xol_of_Chaos
  • IRC nick: Xol
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2012, 06:39:53 pm »
0

I feel like I'm being trolled.  I will try my best to respond anyway.

Horses: There is an epidemic of hybrid cavalry.  5 riding offers an enormous return for a relatively small investment.  Upping the heavier and more effective horses to a 6 riding minimum serves to curb the reward for investing a low number of points in riding.  Perhaps the large warhorse, cataphract, and charger could remain at 5 riding, as they are somewhat less effective than the destrier, warhorse, mamluk, etc.  Frankly, I'd like to see cavalry very heavily rebalanced to be more varied in terms of stats and requirement, but at the moment asking players to invest more in riding to reap the reward seems to be the simplest solution to cav overpopulation.

Health:  The goal isn't to make people have more health, the goal is to make iron flesh a more attractive build choice.

2h stab:  Yes, 2h stab has been consistently overpowered.  Right now it is better than ever.  You can hit an opponent at close range nearly instantly, if you perform the attack properly (stab slightly to the left and turn right, which also works with poles and to a lesser extent, 1h).  While the turn change did slightly nerf the 2h stab, it only really encourages backpedaling, and the absolutely gigantic buff it gained from the animation change outweighs it.  While the quicker strike has benefited all melee classes, one handers simply don't do enough damage not to glance frequently early in the animation.  Poles have always had quick stabs, so the benefit is not as obvious.  However, because of the way the two handed stab animation is performed, from head height, it virtually guarantees a head strike at close range, doing huge amounts of damage.  On top of this, the overhead turn change has made it trivial to sidestep an overhead, so it is used with far less frequency.  Left and right swings are inadvisable when teammates are nearby.  What does that leave?  lolstabs.  This isn't a suggestion to fix 2h stab.  This is a suggestion to change it  back to something less broken (and fix overheads in the process).

Archers & Throwers:  I actually don't see where you're coming from here.  Right now everyone uses a minimum powerdraw/power throw build with lots of weapon master.  There's physically no way for someone to go with a higher power draw and not lose some weapon proficiency in either case.  Right now an 18-21 7 WM archer build has about 165 wpf at level 30.  The same build would have about 161 wpf with the proposed change.  The only difference would be that going 21-18, 24-15, etc. would be viable instead of a waste.
boop

Offline Pandemona

  • Game Admin (trial)
  • ****
  • Renown: 321
  • Infamy: 38
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • We are all of us what we do
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Pandemona
  • IRC nick: Pandemona
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2012, 06:55:42 pm »
0
If they raise required riding for any horse, they MUST give free respec to all cavalries.
Remember remember the fifth of November. The gunpowder, treason and plot. I know of no reason, why the gunpowder treason, should ever be forgot.

Offline Rebelyell

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 398
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Bobby
  • IRC nick: boobby
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2012, 07:01:25 pm »
0
nerf nerf nerf


lets nerf nerf


no more nerfs
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Hey, I just met you,
And this is crazy,
You just killed me
Nerf you maybe?

Offline Herr_Thomas

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 110
  • Infamy: 29
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Wolfgang
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2012, 07:17:01 pm »
+2
The only answer is to buff polearms.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Oh, and style matters way more than anything else regarding armor.

Offline Mlekce

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 454
  • Infamy: 367
  • cRPG Player
  • Remove kebab
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard, ex Byzantium
  • Game nicks: Mlekce, Sergius
  • IRC nick: Mlekce
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2012, 07:30:06 pm »
-1
balanced game = booring.
leave it as it is,let us enjoy this mod untill bannerlord get released.

Offline _GTX_

  • I <3 Shemaforash
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 535
  • Infamy: 960
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • O===((:::::::::::::::>
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmarunionen
  • Game nicks: GTX
  • IRC nick: GTX
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2012, 09:52:22 pm »
+1
We do not need more infantry nerfs...... This game is getting more and more dull. We need to speed the melee combat up, the never ending fights is alrdy boring as hell. Which can explain why so many went cav and archers... its just 10 times more effective at killing, since u need 2 mins to just kill 1 guy in melee.

So plz, no more infantry nerfs.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Bronto

  • Head NA admin
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1339
  • Infamy: 268
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2012, 09:56:05 pm »
0
I've always thought a good way to balance the game and eliminate kiting would be adding STAMINA. You can add a sprint but only be able to do it for so long before you stamina is drained. Shooting takes stamina, swinging takes stamina, blocking takes stamina. This way you don't have one strength build maul crutcher just overheading all your team/shielders, you don't have archers kiting because if they've been shooting they aren't going to be able to run very far. You can't just hide behind your 9 shield skill because eventually exhaustion sets in and you can't attack or block. I think this would be a great way to balance the game but probably not feasible as stamina doesn't even exist in this mod/game to begin with.

Also, instead of eliminating couching, make lances break. Your couch connects on either a person or shield, guess what, your lance is broken and now you have to either melee from horseback or dismount and melee on the ground.

Offline Kelugarn

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 936
  • Infamy: 79
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • #̪͎̳̭̰͓͙ͯ͗̇͘ͅͅ1̢ͨ̈̆̓ͮ͐̌͏̪̦͓̣ ̽̇ͫ҉̸͕̻͙͖̮̹ͅN̡̥̭͖͙ͮ͊͡
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Free Peasants of Fisdnar
  • Game nicks: Froyo The Wizard
  • IRC nick: #FreeArys2012
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #12 on: October 27, 2012, 10:08:31 pm »
0
I've always thought a good way to balance the game and eliminate kiting would be adding STAMINA. You can add a sprint but only be able to do it for so long before you stamina is drained. Shooting takes stamina, swinging takes stamina, blocking takes stamina. This way you don't have one strength build maul crutcher just overheading all your team/shielders, you don't have archers kiting because if they've been shooting they aren't going to be able to run very far. You can't just hide behind your 9 shield skill because eventually exhaustion sets in and you can't attack or block. I think this would be a great way to balance the game but probably not feasible as stamina doesn't even exist in this mod/game to begin with.

Also, instead of eliminating couching, make lances break. Your couch connects on either a person or shield, guess what, your lance is broken and now you have to either melee from horseback or dismount and melee on the ground.

People have been throwing the idea of stamina around for a long time, devs have repeatedly said no  :cry: .
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Sandersson Jankins

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1450
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CSA Apologists
  • Game nicks: fnord
  • IRC nick: "There's always a bigger nerd"- Qui-Gong Jim, Star Trek IV: Electric Boogalo
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #13 on: October 27, 2012, 10:36:49 pm »
-1
I think that a lance entirely breaking upon couching is a bit harsh. I'd be in favour of simply raising the "cooldown" on couching quite a lot in all circumstances, or raise it very high after a successful couch.

I mean, a heavy lance has ~700 repairs if I remember correctly. Doesn't seem very fair to be able to use it one time (with a couch, I guess you could still thrust all day?) and have it break.

(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

the administrator of this forum is the Internet Keyboard man? Can only play "authority" in the virtual world?Can you tell me why?

Offline dreadnok

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 838
  • Infamy: 562
  • cRPG Player
  • fuck these jerkoff kids
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KBW<MB<SoW
  • Game nicks: Gorp_The_Gorger
Re: Big Fat Balance Recommendation
« Reply #14 on: October 27, 2012, 10:37:31 pm »
+1
no comment due to being afraid of being banned again
visitors can't see pics , please register or login