No moving when you have no strat ticks.

[Haboe]

Simple, to prevent multi accounting, you should not be able to move in strategus when you have no ticks.

If you have no interest in crpg but only strat, that will be no problem if strat ticks were given in strat battles.



Discuss.

[Muki]

How is this better than the current system we have?

[Latvian]

it is not hard for multi accounters to play like 1 h a day with their second (or even fifth)account to get decent number of ticks.

[Haboe]

It is harder.

It improves the current system by annoying multiaccounters.

[dodnet]

Simple, to prevent multi accounting, you should not be able to move in strategus when you have no ticks.

If you have no interest in crpg but only strat, that will be no problem if strat ticks were given in strat battles.

You can recruit up to 100 troops without using tickets, so you wont see any 0 ticket players.

AND PLEASE dont remove that, I still want to play strat without the need to play cRPG (besides battles)

[Thovex]

If this gets implented, do please give us strat ticks for fighting Strat battles.

[Haboe]

Multiaccounting does not get banned, then nerfing them is the next best option.

[PhantomZero]

You can play for like a single weekend and be good on ticks for a month. People who have invested in multiple accounts would not find it difficult to come up with more ticks. All of their accounts probably have thousands already.

[Segd]

If this gets implented, do please give us strat ticks for fighting Strat battles.

This. 1strat tick(200sec) = 3-4 c-rpg ticks.

[Thovex]

You can play for like a single weekend and be good on ticks for a month. People who have invested in multiple accounts would not find it difficult to come up with more ticks. All of their accounts probably have thousands already.

The problem is that I don't like playing cRPG at the moment, with the incredible rate of archers & cav on EU.
But I do like playing strategus battles.

[PhantomZero]

The problem is that I don't like playing cRPG at the moment, with the incredible rate of archers & cav on EU.
But I do like playing strategus battles.

Play on NA I guess? Or equip a shield?

Archers are awful and cav is map specific. Play on siege.

I played for like 10 hours last weekend and I still have 300 ticks left.

[Thovex]

Play on NA I guess? Or equip a shield?

Archers are awful and cav is map specific. Play on siege.

I played for like 10 hours last weekend and I still have 300 ticks left.

I don't feel like being pushed to play on NA for strat ticks, Equiping a shield and archers will simply kite away till its broken.

Siege is ok, but it gets boring real fast with the amazing map rotation & teamswitches.

I'd rather just get ticks for playing strat...

[dodnet]

The problem is that I don't like playing cRPG at the moment, with the incredible rate of archers & cav on EU.
But I do like playing strategus battles.

Same for me. I got bored of battles (at all), but strategus is still a bit of fun. I'm at 1 tick now for a week.

[Thovex]

Same for me. I got bored of battles (at all), but strategus is still a bit of fun. I'm at 1 tick now for a week.

Well, lucky me I got 1100 ticks, but its counting down, was at 1300. 

[Blackzilla]

I Disagree because the most ticks I've had this strat is 115, I can only play every other day, sometimes I can't even play during the week. I barely get 50 ticks a week tbh. the only Crpg related thing I can do is strat. I go on trade runs, manage my fief, defend my village etc.. Basically, impletmenting this would kill strat for me and would make it impossible for me to play/have fun with it.