Author Topic: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU  (Read 44068 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline KaMiKaZe_JoE

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 904
  • Infamy: 117
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Cavalieres
  • Game nicks: KaMiKaZe _______
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #270 on: December 16, 2012, 05:55:11 am »
+1
Yeah FCC should totally declare war on TKoV. Would be most fun!

Gotta finish with Hosp first, tho.
"I don't think I'd want to meet anyone from cRPG. Sorry no offense lol" -TG

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #271 on: December 16, 2012, 06:04:34 am »
+3
FCC is the only faction to be at war this entire strat round. I wish there were stats on how many attacks each gorup has made how many men lost and how many men killed. Cost of equipment lost in battle.

So I am not sure what you are saying. We attacked Kutt equal footing same size organizations. We won and took two cities on the first try without raiding. That is an accomplishment.

Once we are done. We defended Bird lands.

Once they were safe we continued to march into Hosp (another equal sized clan) lands and are doing rather well. It took a couple changes in strategy but we now have a foothold and will see what we can do. I think we are doing a rather nice job currently this strat of keeping things going.

for those who do the strat battled look at your participated list. I am willing to bet for most of you the majority of your large fights even either been fighting for or against the fcc.
Leader of BS

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #272 on: December 16, 2012, 06:09:33 am »
+1
FCC is the only faction to be at war this entire strat round. I wish there were stats on how many attacks each gorup has made how many men lost and how many men killed. Cost of equipment lost in battle.

So I am not sure what you are saying. We attacked Kutt equal footing same size organizations. We won and took two cities on the first try without raiding. That is an accomplishment.

Once we are done. We defended Bird lands.

Once they were safe we continued to march into Hosp (another equal sized clan) lands and are doing rather well. It took a couple changes in strategy but we now have a foothold and will see what we can do. I think we are doing a rather nice job currently this strat of keeping things going.

for those who do the strat battled look at your participated list. I am willing to bet for most of you the majority of your large fights even either been fighting for or against the fcc.

Yeah I forgot to make the celebration announcement - the battle earlier today was the 100th battle FCC has done since the beginning of strat 4 (kind of similar tempo to what we have done every strat - strat 2 we had most battles of any faction including eu).  Since strat 4 has been up almost 4 months that equates to almost 1 battle every day on average.  I honestly think our faction members have the most fun of any strat faction win or lose, because we play the game the way strat is supposed to be played - full on fighting and not a trading simulator.
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline Goretooth

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 634
  • Infamy: 237
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #273 on: December 16, 2012, 06:46:12 am »
+1
Yeah I forgot to make the celebration announcement - the battle earlier today was the 100th battle FCC has done since the beginning of strat 4 (kind of similar tempo to what we have done every strat - strat 2 we had most battles of any faction including eu).  Since strat 4 has been up almost 4 months that equates to almost 1 battle every day on average.  I honestly think our faction members have the most fun of any strat faction win or lose, because we play the game the way strat is supposed to be played - full on fighting and not a trading simulator.
  :shock: why is this in the wars and alliances thread? http://forum.meleegaming.com/spam/
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Braeden - Clanless maybe? or Free Peasant not sure - Rarely plays, plus might be retarded
Tydeus - Nord EU Scum - Hates adminning

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #274 on: December 16, 2012, 06:50:52 am »
0
  :shock: why is this in the wars and alliances thread? http://forum.meleegaming.com/spam/

the battle earlier today was the 100th battle FCC has done since the beginning of strat 4

We are talking about Wars.
Leader of BS

Offline Goretooth

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 634
  • Infamy: 237
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #275 on: December 16, 2012, 06:52:09 am »
+1
the battle earlier today was the 100th battle FCC has done since the beginning of strat 4

We are talking about Wars.
lol who counted 1000 battles?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Braeden - Clanless maybe? or Free Peasant not sure - Rarely plays, plus might be retarded
Tydeus - Nord EU Scum - Hates adminning

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #276 on: December 16, 2012, 06:53:32 am »
0
lol who counted 1000 battles?

100 battles. need to start calling you readingcomprehensionTooth
Leader of BS

Offline Goretooth

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 634
  • Infamy: 237
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #277 on: December 16, 2012, 06:55:45 am »
+1
100 battles. need to start calling you readingcomprehensionTooth
1000 100 still who counted them?
kesh or you?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Braeden - Clanless maybe? or Free Peasant not sure - Rarely plays, plus might be retarded
Tydeus - Nord EU Scum - Hates adminning

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #278 on: December 16, 2012, 07:06:11 am »
0
not something I would do
Leader of BS

Offline Aztek

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 282
  • Infamy: 62
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Hospitaller
  • Game nicks: Hospitaller Aztek
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #279 on: December 16, 2012, 07:07:22 am »
+2
FCC has been doing well this strat no question, but a few things I would like to point out.

Kutt did not have an equal organization nor footing as FCC, they simply had a lot of villages and what not from the voting system. They also did not have as many active players as FCC and as many resources to hold their claims which was made obvious after your invasion and the lack of resistance.

As for us Hospitaller, we were battered from the tkov/every other faction war on us. We never had a chance to rebuild or gain any viable trade routes as we were locked down, yes we have made a few eu runs but those were extremely minor in comparison to the free reign tkov and FCC had/has. Of course you are doing well, but to say these are "accomplishments" is a bit much.

FCC and tkov have a lot of heroes, that helps a lot in any battle, I'm in not ashamed to say we're lacking in that department, even I am horrible in battles but we deal with it. Now we do have some quality guys/gals, I'm just talking in comparison.

FCC vs tkov would be epic, both factions are the only 2 that have had free reign to monopolize the na map without resistance, either faction taking the other out would be an accomplishment, taking out smaller unorganized clans is more in line with a participation ribbon.

Feel free to throw numbers in our faction, I've been bugging peppo to take off dozens of names from our roster as they don't play nor contribute to strat, as all clans get I'm sure, but I guarantee our active members would be 1/3 of what shows on our faction page.

Offline Rikthor

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 432
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BOARD Clan
  • Game nicks: Historian_Rikthorrr
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #280 on: December 16, 2012, 07:57:46 am »
+11
Hey nerds, stop sperging about whatever garbage you are posting. Post you are in alliance with someone or at war with someone, that's it. That's all this thread is for.
Quote from: chadz
No matter how long you guys cry - I will not give in to dumbing strategus down because some people just want battles. If all you want are battles, then play cRPG, not strat. There are other people who like advanced gameplay.

Trolololololol

Offline Knute

  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 682
  • Infamy: 21
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Free Peasants of Fisdnar
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #281 on: December 16, 2012, 09:12:51 pm »
0
can exile token look like a sakura blossom :D

I want the imageshack direct link to a hand drawn cherry blossom on my screen by the end of the week. 

---

Do any of the EU clans on the chart without a banner have one?  I searched the ladder menu but couldn't find anything for:

Shu Han
Banditos
Rebels
Joannits (have one but it's not showing up atm)

Also any other clan that's active in strat but not up there lemme know.

Offline Aderyn

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 365
  • Infamy: 243
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Kalmar Union
  • Game nicks: Aderyn
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #282 on: December 16, 2012, 10:02:26 pm »
0
I want the imageshack direct link to a hand drawn cherry blossom on my screen by the end of the week. 

---

Do any of the EU clans on the chart without a banner have one?  I searched the ladder menu but couldn't find anything for:

Shu Han
Banditos
Rebels
Joannits (have one but it's not showing up atm)

Also any other clan that's active in strat but not up there lemme know.

Shu Han is Byzantium tho
Can't spell manslaughter without laughter.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Casimir

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1756
  • Infamy: 271
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The Dashing Templar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Casimir
  • IRC nick: Casimir
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #283 on: December 16, 2012, 10:08:26 pm »
0
Would be nice is crusader alliance showed Templars and SB, as all other factions now seem to have the individual clans represented within them. :)
Turtles

Offline Bjarky

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 352
  • Infamy: 31
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • U got gold? I bring tea, silk, hemp, camels +more!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild (Leadership member)
  • Game nicks: Guard_BD_Bjarky, Guard_the_Lederhosen
  • IRC nick: bjarky
Re: Wars and Alliances - NA and EU
« Reply #284 on: December 16, 2012, 10:11:03 pm »
0
for Shu Han just use that one from their OP  :wink:
http://forum.meleegaming.com/diplomacy/shu-han/
Byz banner just wouldn't fit i think, cus they use a different RP for strat.