Author Topic: Renown  (Read 4722 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline rufio

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 995
  • Infamy: 483
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
  • QQ
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Rufio_pleaser_of_widows, LeLouche_LampeRouge, Quenya_Favourite_of_Rufio
Re: Renown
« Reply #75 on: October 28, 2012, 06:38:26 pm »
0
except that large clan battle leaders get booming renown :) but thats pretty logical
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline dodnet

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 595
  • Infamy: 149
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Wolpertinger
  • Game nicks: DoD, DoD_Wolper
Re: Renown
« Reply #76 on: October 28, 2012, 06:45:07 pm »
0
Renown: 19792
Participated the 2 big strat battles after this update.

Made 2 battles MYSELF (ok both, only 100 troops):
Renown: 836

See the difference?

Its not only a huge difference, I got basically nothing. And I risked my stuff, Thovex himself didn't.

But as whole strategus as it is now only favours large clans, why do I even try?  :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: October 28, 2012, 06:49:30 pm by dodnet »
The logic of war seems to be that if a belligerent can fight he will fight.

(click to show/hide)

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: Renown
« Reply #77 on: October 28, 2012, 06:53:18 pm »
+1
A small clan can "risk" maybe 1 attack all strat round, a large clan about 100? anyone see were the basic difference is?
Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)

Offline Olwen

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 419
  • Infamy: 222
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • A shadow among others
    • View Profile
Re: Renown
« Reply #78 on: October 28, 2012, 07:13:49 pm »
0
Renown: 191456



Bitch please ?


Offline dodnet

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 595
  • Infamy: 149
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Wolpertinger
  • Game nicks: DoD, DoD_Wolper
Re: Renown
« Reply #79 on: October 28, 2012, 07:43:55 pm »
0
My clanmate has 241  :lol:
The logic of war seems to be that if a belligerent can fight he will fight.

(click to show/hide)

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: Renown
« Reply #80 on: October 28, 2012, 09:03:16 pm »
0
Renown: 191456



Bitch please ?

Yep and your faction was involved in what 6 large battles yesterday?
Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)

Offline Olwen

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 419
  • Infamy: 222
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • A shadow among others
    • View Profile
Re: Renown
« Reply #81 on: October 28, 2012, 09:52:57 pm »
0
actually i got 180k from the single battle of Yalibe

it depends of the stuff you looted, and i actually looted a lot of high tier stuff during this battle

on the contrary, defeating vendetta's ragdolls only gave me 10k