Author Topic: The Annexation of Ismirala  (Read 17215 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Tyr_

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 445
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player
  • Suum cuique
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Tyr; Merc_Nemo; Caesar_Salad
  • IRC nick: Tyr_
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #30 on: September 30, 2012, 02:49:29 am »
+5
It's like they are desperatly looking for reasons for their totally not a carebear alliance to help them out in the war! This is obviously a bug, because they don't stoop that low, do they?


Yeah Zapper, as far as i know you are in the most independent strat faction and your leaders threaten nobody with a carebear-alliance that backs you up

<20:08:57> "A_Cunt": Andswaru: we wouldnt of engaged in any kind of talking with mercs
Andswaru: btw deadline is 8pm.
Andswaru: Okay
Andswaru: just saw the nighttime.
Andswaru: If you dont change it, or give us the castle, were gonna declare for the UIF.
Andswaru: You got 1 hour.

Have fun in non-english ts :rolleyes:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline arowaine

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 614
  • Infamy: 159
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • http://occitanclan.webs.com/
  • Faction: Occitan
  • Game nicks: Occitan_Arowaine
  • IRC nick: arowaine
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #31 on: September 30, 2012, 04:22:01 am »
0


Druzhina_Rohmir, member of Occitan


try harder cicero

ho he is taking care of battle roster when none of us cant take care of it and want to still have battle for fun if you guys attack us some of us work at that time so sometime it is hard to make it.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2012, 04:25:07 am by arowaine »
Desire: pls smite FCC 2.0 T.T

Offline Lemmy_Winks

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 241
  • Infamy: 230
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Lemmy_Winks
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #32 on: September 30, 2012, 04:26:21 am »
+4
Arrowine there is plenty of room in the desert in NA for you guys. Come back you know you want to.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline arowaine

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 614
  • Infamy: 159
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • http://occitanclan.webs.com/
  • Faction: Occitan
  • Game nicks: Occitan_Arowaine
  • IRC nick: arowaine
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #33 on: September 30, 2012, 04:27:28 am »
+1
Arrowine there is plenty of room in the desert in NA for you guys. Come back you know you want to.

no thanks we enjoy eu side rigth now lot more action still drama cause some young guys but well who care still a lot of action and battle.

anyways arent we french scum ? :)
« Last Edit: September 30, 2012, 04:44:06 am by arowaine »
Desire: pls smite FCC 2.0 T.T

Offline Falka

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1257
  • Infamy: 423
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #34 on: September 30, 2012, 04:44:49 am »
+1
Should be forced night time for everyone from 00:00 to 08:00 :)
I'd say there should be "night" time between 8 and 16  :rolleyes:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #35 on: September 30, 2012, 05:51:53 am »
+1
anyways arent we french scum ? :)

French CANADIAN scum. Get it right.

You lower your standards if you say you are JUST French.:wink:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline DaveUKR

  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 1456
  • Infamy: 242
  • cRPG Player
  • Small rain lays great dust
    • View Profile
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #36 on: September 30, 2012, 08:41:26 am »
0
Mercs getting fooled and attacked by a big faction who says "we didn't lie, we promised you nothing and we didn't backstab you!" in the early stages of Strategus - classic  :lol:

I never believed in Nords without UIF this strat, but some of our leaders were charmed by some of your cool members and harboured illusions about you when it was obvious that you don't see any other way to exist if not with UIF and already decided to be with UIF before talking to Mercs :rolleyes:

Anyway, I hope everyone will have fun and nice time fighting there  :wink:

Offline Falka

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1257
  • Infamy: 423
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #37 on: September 30, 2012, 09:22:37 am »
0

I never believed in Nords without UIF this strat, but some of our leaders were charmed by some of your cool members and harboured illusions about you when it was obvious that you don't see any other way to exist if not with UIF and already decided to be with UIF before talking to Mercs :rolleyes:

Seeing Nords in rosters - always with UIF, never against them - it really didn't require great diplomatic skills to know a part of which alliance they are, so don't be so proud of yourself  :mrgreen:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline the real god emperor

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1630
  • Infamy: 348
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
  • Et tu, Brute?
    • View Profile
    • Click for gifts
  • Faction: Rome
  • Game nicks: Captain_Sweden
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #38 on: September 30, 2012, 09:25:41 am »
+1
(click to show/hide)

Offline okiN

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 924
  • Infamy: 129
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #39 on: September 30, 2012, 09:55:19 am »
0
No one has ever claimed that our alliance is anything but carebears. Thomas and I refer fondly to it as such openly. I would fondly post the Calradian carebear banner for c-RPG but alas I can not find it.

I don't mind the carebearing, that's hardly anything new, but acting all indignant while it's completely obvious to anyone with two brain cells that they're just manufacturing an excuse out of thin air to break the NAP and join the war on the Mercs' behalf? Come on, show a little class. :P
Don't.

Offline Noctivagant

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 470
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player
  • I solve practical problems
    • View Profile
    • I never drank a six pack of warm beer
  • Faction: Mercenaries
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #40 on: September 30, 2012, 10:18:11 am »
+9
Basically Mercs have tried to keep Nords as neutral as possible by doing naive favors in fiefs. Nords have played smart reserved their armies and got rid of the Mercs when Mercs had no importance for them anymore.
This was a decisive moment in Strategus 4, it was important to see the possible changes in diplomacy dynamics. I expect Nords to pull out
and anyone who tries to gank us can count on having a ferocious enemy for the rest of the round,allying with whoever will put us in the best position to wipe them.

card

Which we all know where this is leading and please don't make a wall of text of about it. I believe this is exactly what Muffin meant by claiming the moral high ground.  I wish good luck to neutral or small maybe new clans in this upcoming boredom of who hates the other one more than anyone else. I hope it can go without a massive flame war. Which it eventually will (I see some minions at work already)

As long as this mentality goes on, Strategus will never become a dynamic game but a massive football match run by bunch of hooligans.

Good luck.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #41 on: September 30, 2012, 10:43:41 am »
+3
Basically Mercs have tried to keep Nords as neutral as possible by doing naive favors in fiefs

Nocti, the only fief that mercs owned in our claim, the village of Aldelen, was traded from the mercs to the SoA, we have then respected this fief transfer by allowing the SoA to keep this fief.
The other SoA fief,Chalbek Castle belonged them at the start, Kulum was a fief they had taken which we had plans for. Therefore I told the SoA guys that they could either stay and fight us, or take up there claims for promised eastern fiefs with the Mercs and hand over those fiefs without combat. They chose without combat and are now as a result of that deal are allowed free passage in Nord territory.
So if you could explain what fief favour you did us, I would be happy to gain a fuller understanding of the situation, especially since i dont see currently the SoA having recieved a new set of fiefs in the Eastern regions as they were promised in exchange for there votes at the beginning of the round.
Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)

Offline DaveUKR

  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 1456
  • Infamy: 242
  • cRPG Player
  • Small rain lays great dust
    • View Profile
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #42 on: September 30, 2012, 11:00:23 am »
-2
Nocti, the only fief that mercs owned in our claim, the village of Aldelen, was traded from the mercs to the SoA, we have then respected this fief transfer by allowing the SoA to keep this fief.
The other SoA fief,Chalbek Castle belonged them at the start, Kulum was a fief they had taken which we had plans for. Therefore I told the SoA guys that they could either stay and fight us, or take up there claims for promised eastern fiefs with the Mercs and hand over those fiefs without combat. They chose without combat and are now as a result of that deal are allowed free passage in Nord territory.
So if you could explain what fief favour you did us, I would be happy to gain a fuller understanding of the situation, especially since i dont see currently the SoA having recieved a new set of fiefs in the Eastern regions as they were promised in exchange for there votes at the beginning of the round.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Noctivagant

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 470
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player
  • I solve practical problems
    • View Profile
    • I never drank a six pack of warm beer
  • Faction: Mercenaries
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #43 on: September 30, 2012, 11:01:49 am »
+6
Nocti, the only fief that mercs owned in our claim, the village of Aldelen, was traded from the mercs to the SoA, we have then respected this fief transfer by allowing the SoA to keep this fief.
The other SoA fief,Chalbek Castle belonged them at the start, Kulum was a fief they had taken which we had plans for. Therefore I told the SoA guys that they could either stay and fight us, or take up there claims for promised eastern fiefs with the Mercs and hand over those fiefs without combat. They chose without combat and are now as a result of that deal are allowed free passage in Nord territory.
So if you could explain what fief favour you did us, I would be happy to gain a fuller understanding of the situation, especially since i dont see currently the SoA having recieved a new set of fiefs in the Eastern regions as they were promised in exchange for there votes at the beginning of the round.

Mercs wanted to see Nords neutral, as Nords presented. Therefor Merc diplomats spoke to SOA and Alpha himself about Jelbegi and the rest to hand it over to Nords without any agression. In exchange for our own fiefs. Rest of the eastern front has supported the idea.
Derchios and Shenuzgda was given to Templars, just for the friendly relations with Nords. Also Templars would gain new allies and man power in south. I thought good will would make a change. We had no intention of draging Nords into an alliance. You'd at least try to talk to us about Ismirala, before preparing a shiny army and kicking the diplomat out of the server. I don't know how the meeting went today, where I left you were saying I'm taking that castle no matter what. Excuse me but saying Free passage for several fiefs....thats a bit arrogant, I also find it quite bold to say : I made a post 10 minutes after you and you either obey it or accept the consequences. I find it quite UIF like, self rightous. But if this is how you want to handle things, I can't stop you.

At least we have tried.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Tavuk_Bey

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 409
  • Infamy: 233
  • cRPG Player
  • herrroo, my näym iz bokkkseee änd i'm fukken ugry
    • View Profile
  • Faction: bashibazouk, the official jihad clan
  • Game nicks: tavuk
  • IRC nick: Minister of Shitstorm
Re: The Annexation of Ismirala
« Reply #44 on: September 30, 2012, 11:42:53 am »
+5
finally drama starts again

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


roast and roast again until lambs become kebab