Author Topic: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?  (Read 6343 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Felagunda

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 5
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« on: April 14, 2011, 04:12:02 am »
+1
Has anyone considered that if we do the whole thieves taking heirlooms again (gen / 3 = how many looms you can save) that many people who either just came to to crpg from the first "big" patch will quit again?  Or that people that have not come back but still might have returned will definatlly not come back?  I have a few old Takeda friends that I was still hoping would come back to crpg. 

Most of them were inbetween gen 9-3.  Would that mean that now the looms they would get back would be (say at gen 9) =  9 /3 /3 = 1?  So that those people that were gen 9 will come back to 1 loom?  I hope you guys are thinking about things like this.  This won't just be another one of those fail patches were you only think on the new ideas and not how they will effect the population, community, game play, balance, strat, ect ect ect..

Any thoughts?

I do understand that you wish to give people the choice to re loom a weapon since there is this talk of weapons taking up to 3 weapon slots.  That will be such a big changer ya I guess you would want people to re loom but must you lose a ton all over again?  2/3 being a ton imo.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2011, 04:16:50 am by Felagunda »

Offline Seawied

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 45
  • Infamy: 21
  • cRPG Player
  • Climbing in yo window, snatching yo people up!
    • View Profile
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2011, 04:15:32 am »
0
no. There needs to be a cutoff.

I have not retired since the January patch and I shouldn't be punished for this decision. People who are gen 16+ should have heirlooms capped at 15, but anything beyond that is unreasonable.
So with PT >10 stones become simple too effective
:lol:

Offline Felagunda

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 5
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2011, 04:20:54 am »
0
no. There needs to be a cutoff.

I have not retired since the January patch and I shouldn't be punished for this decision. People who are gen 16+ should have heirlooms capped at 15, but anything beyond that is unreasonable.

makes 0 sense your logic is fucked

Offline Lizard_man

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 717
  • Infamy: 153
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Lizard_man, Jinmenju
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2011, 05:22:16 am »
0
i'll be pissed if i lose my looms again... :evil:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Ramsay

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 21
  • Infamy: 1
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Ramsay
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #4 on: April 14, 2011, 05:34:18 am »
0
Worry not. Heirlooms will probably stay the same. And no reset. You should be more worried about your favorite loomed Side Sword and other weapons as form what I heard there's gonna be some serious nerfing going on.

Offline Lizard_man

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 717
  • Infamy: 153
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Lizard_man, Jinmenju
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #5 on: April 14, 2011, 05:37:39 am »
0
hopefully, as for the weapons, i hope mine aren't on the list... :)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline EliteDragon

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 7
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Eastern Tsardom (RIP)
  • Game nicks: EliteDragon
  • IRC nick: EliteDragon
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #6 on: April 14, 2011, 06:24:54 am »
0
Worry not. Heirlooms will probably stay the same. And no reset. You should be more worried about your favorite loomed Side Sword and other weapons as form what I heard there's gonna be some serious nerfing going on.

And you know this because...?

Offline Felagunda

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 5
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2011, 07:19:19 am »
0
I just don't wanna see more people leave that just came back.  Or people that might have come back deffinatly never come back because of it.

Offline tankmen

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 65
  • Infamy: 28
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2011, 08:21:12 am »
0
not a day goes by that i don't think " what would i do with those two heirlooms i got taken from me" if i have to sit there and say " what would i do with those seven heirlooms that were taken from me". Id honestly quit in sadness... because im gen 18 and if i had those two heirlooms back id be a happy  tankmen, but i don't n never will and people making heirlooms seem OP(goretooth) are going and ruining every thing.... its the items themselves not the heir looming.
The purpose of wearing plate has become nothing more than crippling yourself to look like a knight... or maybe its my lack of athletics

Offline Siiem

  • Heretic
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 611
  • Infamy: 129
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #9 on: April 14, 2011, 09:27:17 am »
0
A heirloom reset, considering the huge change coming wouldn't be a bad idea, give people a fresh start with such a big change. Doubt it however. :(

Offline Akryn

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 45
  • Infamy: 3
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • I will undoubtedly accidentally team-hit you.
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Akryn
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #10 on: April 14, 2011, 09:35:02 am »
0
I would love it if we get to keep the same number of heirlooms and just redistribute them, but I doubt that will happen.

Not sure if that's what previous posts mean or not.
Blinky the Arabian Warhorse:  2009-2012
Winky the Destrier:                2012-present

Offline chadz

  • The lazy
  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 3188
  • Infamy: 724
  • Sir Black King A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: irc://
  • IRC nick: chadz
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #11 on: April 14, 2011, 09:45:45 am »
0
Heirloom theft...

Didn't think of that, but it could solve quite some problems.

Thanks for the suggestion (Also please post suggestions in the suggestion forum in the future).

Offline Goretooth

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 634
  • Infamy: 237
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #12 on: April 14, 2011, 10:05:58 am »
0
not a day goes by that i don't think " what would i do with those two heirlooms i got taken from me" if i have to sit there and say " what would i do with those seven heirlooms that were taken from me". Id honestly quit in sadness... because im gen 18 and if i had those two heirlooms back id be a happy  tankmen, but i don't n never will and people making heirlooms seem OP(goretooth) are going and ruining every thing.... its the items themselves not the heir looming.
How am I ruining everything? I dont see anyone else on the battlefield like myself or anyone constantly switching from pure archer to pure melee.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Braeden - Clanless maybe? or Free Peasant not sure - Rarely plays, plus might be retarded
Tydeus - Nord EU Scum - Hates adminning

Offline Blondin

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 121
  • Infamy: 33
  • cRPG Player
  • aka Blondie
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Blondin, Tuco, Sentenza
  • IRC nick: Blondin
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #13 on: April 14, 2011, 12:25:15 pm »
0
Is the thief will be Fasader again or someone esle?

Poor Fasader, his popularity is so bad since last time...

Offline Punisher

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 127
  • Infamy: 17
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Punisher
Re: Heirlooms/3 again thought of this?
« Reply #14 on: April 14, 2011, 12:27:00 pm »
0
You can all thank Felagunda for bringing this to chadz's attention.