Author Topic: Transfer a village vs taking undefended  (Read 409 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Transfer a village vs taking undefended
« on: September 18, 2012, 10:18:12 pm »
0
If we're trading villages would there be any downside to just having the other people attack it, or would it be better for the village (production points or population, prosperity, etc) if we were to transfer it over?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Tanken

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1463
  • Infamy: 395
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Tanken
Re: Transfer a village vs taking undefended
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2012, 10:43:50 pm »
0
We found the best way to transfer it is to have the person who wants it, apply to your faction, transfer it to them, they leave your faction, and rejoin their own.


It is done in like 3 minutes.

Transferring to someone out of your faction doesn't work (we tried it)
Below is a Collection of Finalists in my Design my Avatar contest -- They all did Awesome!
Thanks to all of those who contributed.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Mike_of_Kingswell

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 258
  • Infamy: 87
  • cRPG Player
  • If a guy looks dangerous he probably is.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Mike_of_Kingswell
  • IRC nick: MikeOfKingswell
Re: Transfer a village vs taking undefended
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2012, 10:45:14 pm »
0
Here is what i know from last strat:

You attack the village and show up yourself (else its autoloose ;) ) there are 2 options:

- NO enemy shows up (at all) : the village goes to the attackers and looses the population(regrows slowly)
-1 enemy shows up, you take down flags and kill the guy: village keeps 299 population, u get the village, all is well

Thats basicly what can happen.
The main downside of attacking a fief instead of transfering it is the 24 houre lockdown of the attacker imo.

€: for the transfer stuff: what tanken said ;)
In memory of Fallen_Mike_of_Kingswell, member of The Coalition of Fallen and HRE, ruler of Ismirala Castle
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: Transfer a village vs taking undefended
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2012, 10:48:55 pm »
0
You'd need to have the owner in the fief to transfer though, correct?  You can't transfer a fief between clan members if they're not both in the fief can you?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy