Kafein, you are part of the "problem" actually, your posts always shows a lack of critical thinking and understanding. The Twin Towers are not the main issue either, WTC7 is, and that you some how know better than experts with over 50 years of experience in their field, people who have been rated as
the best demolition experts in the world. Why would anyone who is so highly rated, with an amazing reputation, expose them self in a case such as this, and for what? Physicists from the best Universities in the world explaining how physics work and why the official story does not hold water. I would forever and always believe the word of an INDEPENDENT expert, with decades of experience, over some random uneducated preconceived anonymous person on the Internet.
Stupid decision Cracka, creating such a thread on this forum where it's 95% EU Trolls. Especially considering a lot of them are tinfoil hats.
There isn't any sort of "Tinfoil hat" regarding 911, simply
HISTORY. (Obviously there are plenty of ridiculous theories, but the main point here is the Experts angle).
Whatever the truth might be, critical thinking is always what should be promoted.
I didn't write anywhere that I support any of the videos linked
I fully stand behind the CIA/Iran videos though, and from a personal standpoint I attribute 911 as backlash for the US' foreign policy for decades. I will however always be vigilant about issues where highly decorated experts with life long experiences dispute the official explanations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_NorthwoodsOperation Northwoods was a series of false-flag proposals that originated in 1962 within the United States government, and which the Kennedy administration rejected. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of Operation Northwoods was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington."
Operation Northwoods proposals included hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:
"The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere."
Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy.Sounds familiar?Would Bush reject such ideas?
Would Cheney?
(They both only testified behind closed doors, not under oath, no notes or statements were allowed)
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/world/asia/15vietnam.htmlWASHINGTON — In an echo of the debates over the discredited intelligence that helped make the case for the war in Iraq, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday released more than 1,100 pages of previously classified Vietnam-era transcripts that show senators of the time sharply questioning whether they had been deceived by the White House and the Pentagon over the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident.www.nsa.gov/vietnam/index.cfm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_Image( Available at
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2863861954538932125 )Enemy Image is a 2005 documentary film by Mark Daniels about the portrayal of warfare in television news. The film focuses initially on the Vietnam War as the first war ever televised "live". During this war the American government allowed reporters onto the battlefield with little supervision or control. The documentary follows the way The Pentagon learned from this experience to control access by journalists to battle areas in subsequent wars, through the Invasion of Grenada (where journalists were excluded completely) to the first Gulf War, where news packages were provided by the military, to the embedded journalism of the Iraq War. The theme of the film is the progressive tightening of control by the US military on the contact journalists have with soldiers and civilians in the war zone, in order that (as the film says at the end) "never again will television raise the moral and political questions that face a people at war."
The film was aired on Canadian television in 2005.
I would recommend people to watch the Explosive Evidence video and then take notice of the psychologists segment in the end where they explain why exactly people quickly jump at uneducated preconceived opinions for then to not change or question them ever again.
To form an opinion, one has to review
everything, you have to painfully dedicate time to read and watch and understand everything of importance that is for the opinion AND against, then you can make up your mind, it takes a while but that's life. You do not make up your mind prior to that, nor do you only watch a few minutes of some video/TV-news, read a few pages in a book, and then make up your opinion - that is wrong and uninformed. Yes, life is just like school, you have to sit, read, listen and learn.
