Author Topic: comparison to war of the roses (Read 4637 times)

Armbrust_Schtze · « **on:** August 30, 2012, 05:05:41 pm »

seriously compared to war of the roses chivalry (age of chivalry's decendant) looks crappy in historical accuracy, graphic stle and game play as well as in the sheer variety of in game features.

will even anyone pay money for this ?

http://www.onlinewelten.com/games/versus/specials/roses-chivalry-im-preview-vergleich-9098/

[ptx] · « **Reply #1 on:** August 30, 2012, 05:06:53 pm »

Don't you mean the other way around? Chivalry looks way better...

Teeth · « **Reply #2 on:** August 31, 2012, 01:26:13 am »

Seems like Chivalry wins in the Nahkampf category, which if I correctly understand, is the part that matters to me.

Scorp · « **Reply #3 on:** August 31, 2012, 07:23:11 pm »

They are very different

cmp · « **Reply #4 on:** August 31, 2012, 07:50:18 pm »

Seems like Chivalry wins in the Nahkampf category, which if I correctly understand, is the part that matters to me.

Even Tetris wins in the Nahkampf category against War of the Roses.

Bifi · « **Reply #5 on:** August 31, 2012, 08:42:19 pm »

The article says in WotR you can't move through other players. Did they patch that? Because last time I played I walked through them like air.

Armbrust_Schtze · « **Reply #6 on:** August 31, 2012, 11:16:29 pm »

lol chivalry fails along the whole coast...

Siiem · « **Reply #7 on:** September 03, 2012, 08:25:26 pm »

Even Tetris wins in the Nahkampf category against War of the Roses.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login