Author Topic: Lack of low populated battle servers  (Read 3933 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Riddaren

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 601
  • Infamy: 298
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: Riddaren, Matthaus
Lack of low populated battle servers
« on: August 25, 2012, 07:42:19 pm »
+7
There used to be pecores, nordmen, eu4 and the melee server.

Now it's just EU1 and night time only EU4 (which is not fun to play on).
Is it just me or is anyone else missing the old times when there where more servers people played on?

Offline Piok

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 121
  • Infamy: 97
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2012, 07:49:51 pm »
+13
Nerf ranged and people will return.

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2012, 07:50:59 pm »
+3
I'd rather there was only one NA and one EU battle server.  I'd like to see more 70 v 70 battles, and 100 vs 100 battles.

To me, it's just not nearly as fun when it's 20v20 or 10v10. 
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2012, 07:52:21 pm »
0
I'd rather there was only one NA and one EU battle server.  I'd like to see more 70 v 70 battles, and 100 vs 100 battles.

To me, it's just not nearly as fun when it's 20v20 or 10v10.

Not everyone likes large clusters.

I like 40 and 60 player max servers(save siege which i don't care the numbers unless defender).
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2012, 07:53:39 pm »
+5
And I don't know why, if the servers and our computers could handle it, I'd love to see 200 vs 200 battles, or even 500 vs 500 on open fields.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Kuyamzoleta

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 94
  • Infamy: 11
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Zoleta, WATCHOUT_SON
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2012, 08:00:14 pm »
+2
I can understand why people like low populated servers because the battles tend to be more intimate. The lower the population, the more epic fights get because you can actually focus on 1 or two people and not have to worry about anything else. Whereas in a higher population, you can roleplay as a lawn mower and cut people down left and right, the only distraction being the mass amount of chaos around you.

In NA I remember having servers like Tunatown or haven, which I do indeed miss, but don't really need right now. As far as new player/peasant integration goes, I'd rather have everyone condensed in the few servers we have available now so the new guys can see how a multitude of good guys play.
"twerk miley miley twerk"

Offline Horst_Kurmoottaja

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 163
  • Infamy: 39
  • cRPG Player
  • Ei urhot kaukaisen Pohjolan uhan eessä taipuneet!
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Deserter_Horst, Mamba_
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2012, 11:38:59 am »
+6
Siege seems more fun right now. EU1 is usually too crowded with ranged and cav. It gets so frustrating at times.
Farewell my brother
Farewell my foe
May death embrace you
Your blood in the darkness flow
***PÖRKELE***

Offline Nessaj

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1399
  • Infamy: 176
  • cRPG Player Madam Black Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • ▃ ▅ ▅ ▅ ▄ ▅ ▇ ▅ ▄ ▅ ▇
    • View Profile
    • Vanguard
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Vanguard_Cooties
  • IRC nick: Nessaj
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2012, 11:49:38 am »
+2
Need some nice maps made especially for ~30 people, instead of the "usual random big location with X areas of interest" - EU4 have some OK maps but personally I'm really missing some specific maps that's made for minor skirmishes. Sort of similar to the CTF maps that once were, e.g. 2 pretty much equal bases relatively close to each other with a main area in-between for the clashes. I'd say the size of the native arenas is appropriate (as on the melee server, if they're still there) - but with objects on etc.

If anyone know of some please post though. We would like to populate the Nordmen server with better suited maps.
Things don't exist simply because you believe in them, thus sayeth the almighty creature in the sky!

Offline Miwiw

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 525
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: HRE
  • Game nicks: Miwiw
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2012, 12:04:33 pm »
+1
I still remember some nice maps on pecores Server half a year ago. I enjoyed most of them (I dont know more however :p).
Miwiw_HRE - Two Handed
Trade with me

Offline Rebelyell

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 398
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Bobby
  • IRC nick: boobby
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2012, 12:28:29 pm »
-1
There used to be pecores, nordmen, eu4 and the melee server.

Now it's just EU1 and night time only EU4 (which is not fun to play on).
Is it just me or is anyone else missing the old times when there where more servers people played on?
what is wrong with EU4?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Hey, I just met you,
And this is crazy,
You just killed me
Nerf you maybe?

Offline Byrdi

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 489
  • Infamy: 59
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Byrdi, Swiss Chocolate, and lots of other alts
  • IRC nick: Byrdi
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2012, 12:32:25 pm »
0
what is wrong with EU4?

EU_4 is almost always populated, I never play on EU_1, because I dont have to. Pecores is populated once in a while as well.

I think people stopped playing on Nordmen because the server was not updated and they had removed banner balance; thereby making it a shitty version of EU_4.

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2012, 01:20:34 pm »
0
The game tends to be sluggish everywhere except on pecores for me, but there are players there once in a blue moon.

Offline Riddaren

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 601
  • Infamy: 298
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: Riddaren, Matthaus
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2012, 03:36:08 pm »
+2
I suggest people join Pecores instead of EU4 (unless you like night time and no banner balance).

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1780
  • Infamy: 2839
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #13 on: August 26, 2012, 04:33:26 pm »
0
what is wrong with EU4?

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Zlisch_The_Butcher

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1272
  • Infamy: 971
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction: Frisian Church of Mork The Goat God
  • Game nicks: Zlisch
  • IRC nick: IRC nick: Tears
Re: Lack of low populated battle servers
« Reply #14 on: August 26, 2012, 04:49:31 pm »
0
I suggest people join Pecores instead of EU4 (unless you like night time and no banner balance).
Autobalance is fucked up, whoever is on the pecores team gets a constant 1x on EU_Pecores.
1H stab is the fastest, strongest and longest 1H animation. There's no reason NOT to use it in all instances. I don't know if it's OP, but it's boring. 1H used to be fun because you had a fast (left), long (right) and the most devastating attack (stab) and had to choose the best attack for each occasion.