What has cRPG come to?

[Haragh]

My few pointers:
1. Better balance to map rotation (at least on EU1). Huge change to fan factor.
       - less open cav/archer maps
       - more city maps (old good ones, no need to make new ones)
       - more forest maps (same as above)
   
2. Only 1 quiver for archers. (Okay this may cause some rage from HAs and dedicated archers.. hmm that is 50% from players? )
       - enough arrows already on 1 quiver.
       - archers can now carry melee weapons, at least 1 free slot!

3. Forcefield fix on horses (if it can be done?)
       - Example: Horseman runs towards you and holds weapon block or shield up, so your sword/spear gets blocked while you're trying to hit the horse. This is huge annoyance for melees. I have tried to imagine how horseman reaches his shield or weapon in front of his horse.. neat trick .

[ManOfWar]

Meh I just wanted xbow cav to stop wasting time at the end of rounds.

[Babelfish]

Well, as long as you 2h heroes focus on the "oh he is range, he has such an advantage!!!11" argument, there's no sense in any discussion with you.

I'm a crossbower. Range advantage over melee is huge.
 Shield no longer works against decent archers, everyone and their mother is able to trickshot through it.

[JOPOTINTTI]

for me crpg died when the old crpg got replaced

[Adamar]

I'm a crossbower. Range advantage over melee is huge.
 Shield no longer works against decent archers, everyone and their mother is able to trickshot through it.

Range advantage is so great that cavs and melee still kill more.

[Oberyn]

"I survived the dark ages of archer-fest with my head held high!" to future Crpg players.

Too late, that was ages ago, before archers got nerfed repeatedly to their current state. Imagine native archers, but more accurate, with better firing rate, and dealing more damage. That was the state of archers and crossbowers at the start. Every following iteration of crpg has nerfed range. All the cunts whining about "ZOMG WE ARE LIVING IN OP ARCHER CRPG AGE" are either wearing rose-tinted glasses when looking at the past of the game or weren't even there and are talking out of their ass.

[cmp]

Too late, that was ages ago, before archers got nerfed repeatedly to their current state. Imagine native archers, but more accurate, with better firing rate, and dealing more damage. That was the state of archers and crossbowers at the start. Every following iteration of crpg has nerfed range. All the cunts whining about "ZOMG WE ARE LIVING IN OP ARCHER CRPG AGE" are either wearing rose-tinted glasses when looking at the past of the game or weren't even there and are talking out of their ass.

If the only ranged weapon in cRPG was a 1c dmg stone, there would still be noshield 2h/pole heroes crying about how range is OP. It's probably in their DNA.

[Oberyn]

Don't get me wrong, I also have the "hates ranged with a burning passion" gene somewhere in my DNA. I will never stop calling them cowardly my old friends, even if the only ranged weapon was a 1c dmg stone. But I realize that no, they aren't OP, especially when compared to the way they used to be.

[Swaggart]

DISCLAIMER: I DON'T THINK RANGED IS OP, ANYTHING IN LARGE NUMBERS IS RIDICULOUS AND THAT INCLUDES EVERY CLASS. Keep that in mind when you read the rest of the post

I always find it funny how ranged classes say bring a shield. That would be like archers needing to put points into something to block melee. I wonder how archer min-max builds would look like should they be forced to put 2-3 points in PS so they can block the enraged pincushion standing 1 foot away, or to block that lance heading into the face. It's such a silly argument that one type of playstyle should have a non-optimized build while others don't. Then again, archers would probably just kite even more if that was the case

I also can't remember where I saw it not too long ago, but one archer said something along the lines of "I shoot shielders just fine" so please stop with the patronizing.

[Zlisch_The_Butcher]

I also can't remember where I saw it not too long ago, but one archer said something along the lines of "I shoot shielders just fine" so please stop with the patronizing.

And another archer said "I suck at shooting through the shield but eh, fuck that, I can just kite off and shot someone else, not like anything can catch me anyway."

[cmp]

Don't get me wrong, I also have the "hates ranged with a burning passion" gene somewhere in my DNA. I will never stop calling them cowardly my old friends, even if the only ranged weapon was a 1c dmg stone. But I realize that no, they aren't OP, especially when compared to the way they used to be.

Same. I play pole+noshield after all.

[HardRice]

Same. I play pole+noshield after all.

Nerf.

[Tore]

mod is dead

[Corsair831]

i'm sorry, but you guys (meaning 99% of the community) are just bad at this game.

You die to the already ridiculously weak ranged, because you're too half-witted to take a shield and right click, then you complain ranged is overpowered. You chase archers with their 3 body armour when you have 7000 body armour and when you can't catch them you say that's OP (despite the fact none of you ever have any throwing).

You get lanced in the back when you have no polearm because of your lack of any awareness, and then cav is OP.

It's really not the fault of the game being imbalanced; you're all just bad.

Moo

[Elindor]

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login