Gay Marriage? You'r Thoughts?

[Smoothrich]

Just going to quote myself posting in another thread to interrupt a cRPG gay bashing rally

so is the last page all irony posting or did this really turn into a hate-filled bigot circle jerk

you people are fucking horrible, i'd rather go out for a drink with an HIV positive flamboyant gay man than with someone who genuinely thinks someone's sexual preference means they should be deprived civil rights and basic respect, no seriously you people should all be ashamed and don't belong in 21st century society, you are the real bundle of stickss

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[Vibe]

Fuck yeah Smooth, brigayd approved!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[Bjord]

It's the 21st century, it's okay to be gay!

[IR_Kuoin]

 

[Teeth]

Can anyone link me to a professional article that tells me where and when it is decided that someone is a homosexual?? It can't be genetic, obviously. Or do they still not know that?

[Overdriven]

I'm in two minds. Firstly I can support it because I see no reason to deny anyone those civil liberties. However, equally marriage is technically a religious ceremony, at least traditionally and so traditional churches and the like shouldn't be forced to accept it. It's the same way in this country a doctor can deny referring a girl to an abortion clinic on religious grounds. However said girl could seek out another doctor who will. People should be allowed to support their own religious views as long as they don't break the bounds of the extreme. And with gay marriage there are other options like registry offices ect, and there are also plenty of gay orientated churches.

I saw an interesting campaign a while ago that was something along the lines of why should we be forced to accept homosexuality? Arguing for homosexuality and shoving that down peoples throats is just as bad as doing the same against it. If you disagree with it I see nothing wrong with it and people should be allowed to express that as long as it is within a line and isn't 'damaging' in any way. But legally you also shouldn't deny someone rights because of it. Basically people should be allowed to support either view.

I'm always of a mixed opinion about homosexuality in itself. I would never out right disagree with it, but at the same time I don't wholly support it. I'm on the fence as it were and everything I have read about the science, psychology ect (both supporting and not) has kept me there.

[Rhekimos]

Curious, what kind of anti-gay science have you found?

I'm on the fence as it were and everything I have read about the science, psychology ect (both supporting and not) has kept me there.

You make it sound like the science is muddled on the issue. May I inquire what kind of science there is against homosexuality?

Does some research say that it's harmful, perhaps?

[Son Of Odin]

I think homosexuality is a good thing considering the population growth. More gays => less people die in hunger. More gays => more people adopting children. Heteros can still live normally too. WIN/WIN situation.

ps. Fuck the Church.

[Rhekimos]

I think homosexuality is a good thing considering the population growth. More gays => less people die in hunger. More gays => more people adopting children. Heteros can still live normally too. WIN/WIN situation.

ps. Fuck the Church.

That's a good point.

[Laufknoten]

No.

[Teeth]

You make it sound like the science is muddled on the issue. May I inquire what kind of science there is against homosexuality?

Homosexuals can't do the most important thing according to nature, reproduction, so biology perhaps.

[Son Of Odin]

Homosexuals can't do the most important thing according to nature, reproduction, so biology perhaps.

I think homosexuality is a good thing considering the population growth. More gays => less people die in hunger. More gays => more people adopting children. Heteros can still live normally too. WIN/WIN situation.

ps. Fuck the Church.

Reproduction is what's killing human population so gays actually help us more than you think. According to nature, mass reproduction always ends badly for the species doing it. So again, fuck you religion.

[Rhekimos]

Homosexuals can't do the most important thing according to nature, reproduction, so biology perhaps.

I don't think the population will collapse if we allow 5% of people to marry the same sex. Instead, evolution (and so nature) clearly is of the opinion that a small part of the population being homosexual has some advantages to the species.

In fact, in hunter-gatherer societies it required the work of 3.5 adults to provide for just one child. If the family or tribe had a homosexual couple who would not reproduce themselves, and would help other couples, that tribe grows faster and is likely to win over those that have no such people.

Also there's homosexual behavior in animals too, but I guess those are counted as being outside nature.

[Miwiw]

ps. Fuck the Church.

So again, fuck you religion.

Most important.

Fuck Religion! (Oh btw this only means the Christianity!)

Whoever is against gay marriage is an ignorant fuckhead anyway.

[Leshma]

Don't give a fuck, honestly.

If someone wants to marry a frog, let him if that will make him happy.

Only people I dislike are those who think they have right to affect other people's lives besides their own. Sadly we have ton of people like that and they are cause of most things we call "evil".

Btw. gays are old, next comes discrimination towards cyborgs. It has already started.