Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 13

Author Topic: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)  (Read 15586 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cyclopsided

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 513
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Formerly "Marathon". #sluttiestAdmin
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
  • Game nicks: Cyclopsided_of_Chaos, CYBD, Brunchlady
  • IRC nick: Cyclopsided
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #120 on: August 22, 2012, 12:14:33 am »
+2
Currently at my house in Las vegas, Nevada and with my shit internet here I get:

Current: 195 ms (WHAT? http://www.speedtest.net/result/2132721548.png is a speedtest to chicago, why is this server so bad, I feel like I need to screenshot my command prompt this is so awful)

New: 124 ms
my god this is awful internet. I should get new internet I hope... my internet results should be identical to what is written below.
_______
*I get back to my house in AZ tonight and I'll post what I get from there, But I already know what i get by heart from there.

Location: Arizona

Current: 70 to 80

New: 49 to 55
Always within that range for texas servers.

« Last Edit: August 22, 2012, 12:20:56 am by Marathon »
Logged
Quote from: Digglez on June 29, 2012, 02:34:20 am
Also, I have declared myself #1 NA hybrid thrower
Formerly known as Marathon.
As an NA admin, I am the most laid back and concerned with the ~fun of the game~ above all other factors. I've also been super inactive since Summer 2012. University takes most of my time, but I still find some time to play when i can.

Offline Leon1qaz

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 2
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #121 on: August 22, 2012, 01:46:41 am »
+2
Location: Rio De Janeiro (Brazil)

Current: 168ms

New: 200ms
Logged

Offline Silveredge

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 190
  • Infamy: 41
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Silveredge
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #122 on: August 22, 2012, 03:41:30 am »
+5
Location: So.cal (Southern California)

Current: 86ms

New: 54ms

Texas, the real center of North America.  Don't forget about those Brazilians or the West Coast!  Right now the server is only favoring Canada and the East Coast.
Logged

Offline SixThumbs

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 567
  • Infamy: 60
  • cRPG Player
  • Consumer Whore
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #123 on: August 22, 2012, 04:42:32 am »
+4
Think of the Canadians!
Logged
And how!

Offline Syggelekokle

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 2
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #124 on: August 22, 2012, 05:01:22 am »
+2
Location: Texas Gulf Coast
Current:39ms
New: 15ms
Logged

Offline Wrangham

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 80
  • Infamy: 54
  • cRPG Player
  • In-game: Wrang
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #125 on: August 22, 2012, 05:14:20 am »
+2
Current: 28 ms

Texas: 52 ms

Location: Wisconsin
Logged

Offline Horse_And_Sword

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 52
  • Infamy: 4
  • cRPG Player
  • You like this ^? Yes? Good, good for you sir
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Cavalieres)
  • Game nicks: Cavalieres MIke_N_Ike, Sword and Horse, Derp?
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #126 on: August 22, 2012, 09:20:11 am »
+2
Location Seatle Washington

Current:94ms(94-102 in game)

Texas:102ms
Logged

Offline EyeBeat

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 432
  • Infamy: 175
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 20th BEST PLAYER IN HOSPITALLER
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Hospitaller
  • Game nicks: EyeBeat_The_Wanderer
  • IRC nick: EyeBeat
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #127 on: August 22, 2012, 02:34:48 pm »
+2
Current: 12

Texas: 45

Location: Chicago
Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Quote from: Grumbs on May 02, 2014, 10:49:11 am
Being a smallish community doesn't entitle you to act more like a dick than other communities.

Offline Pollux

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 267
  • Infamy: 27
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #128 on: August 23, 2012, 02:22:28 am »
0
Current - 70

Texas - 52

Location - Washington

CANT W8 FOR THE SWITCH
Logged

Offline Spook Island

  • Shitposter
  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 165
  • Infamy: 183
  • cRPG Player
  • Truth Teller
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #129 on: August 25, 2012, 04:54:08 pm »
+1
Chicago: 39

Texas: 27

Location: Colorado Springs


I know Oklahoma has fiber optic internet if you want to check for servers there since it's right above Texas and wouldn't hurt Canadians as much.
Denver would be the perfect compliment to Chicago's North Mid-East geographical location.
Finally, Kansas is dead center geographically in the middle of the country, but I'm not sure what the internet situation is there.
Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Rhaelys

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 509
  • Infamy: 47
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: Rhaelys_BlockLeft_of_Chaos
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #130 on: August 25, 2012, 11:47:59 pm »
+5
Quote from: Spook Island on August 25, 2012, 04:54:08 pm
Finally, Kansas is dead center geographically in the middle of the country, but I'm not sure what the internet situation is there.

(click to show/hide)
Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Quote from: Uumdi
sweet of you guys to celebrate my birthday
wait you're talking about that devils lettuce arent you, god damnit
Quote from: Kreczor
yo you want to burn some sweet romaine tonight?
Quote from: Uumdi
yeah i smoke that dirty green shit fuck iceberg

Offline Spook Island

  • Shitposter
  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 165
  • Infamy: 183
  • cRPG Player
  • Truth Teller
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #131 on: August 26, 2012, 01:47:14 am »
-1
Quote from: Rhaelys on August 25, 2012, 11:47:59 pm
(click to show/hide)

Hey, you could do the same thing with Oklahoma and Corn, but they have that fiber optic.  Don't judge a book...

Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline palatro

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 12
  • Infamy: 5
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: palatro
  • IRC nick: palatro
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #132 on: August 26, 2012, 04:52:10 am »
+3
current: 39

texas:  108

Northwestern Ontario, basically northern Minnesota.
Like someone said earlier think about the Canadians :P
Texas pretty much rapes my ping and from experience playing CS:S back in the day it seemed like i always got around 120 average and loss or bad routing and what not to Texas servers. The loss and such is probably resolved now, but still shitty ping.
Logged

Offline Turkhammer

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 376
  • Infamy: 194
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #133 on: August 26, 2012, 05:08:41 am »
+2
Current 37

New 77

New Hampshire
Logged

Offline Herr_Thomas

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 110
  • Infamy: 29
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Wolfgang
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #134 on: August 26, 2012, 12:13:05 pm »
+2
Current: 71ms

Texas: 57ms

Location: Portland, Oregon

New servers would give most Americans better ping, besides the ones who practically live inside the server, while screwing over almost all Canadians.

But...
Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Quote from: Marathon on September 16, 2012, 10:15:46 am
Oh, and style matters way more than anything else regarding armor.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 13