Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 13

Author Topic: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)  (Read 15973 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gawagiliglue

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 48
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Gawagiliglue, FIEF_OF_AMERE , Bisexual_Bridal_Shower
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #105 on: August 10, 2012, 05:54:58 pm »
+5
Current: 43ms

Texas: 44ms

Location: Middle Tennessee

Like some other people mentioned already, my ping used to be lower until around 3 weeks ago.  In server it can range from 40's mid 50's. (Previously 25-38)
Logged
Who do you think should recieve the fief of Amere?

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline FRANK_THE_TANK

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1312
  • Infamy: 339
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • FluckCucker
    • View Profile
  • Faction: A Free and proud Peasant of Fisdnar!!!
  • Game nicks: FRANK_THE_TANK
  • IRC nick: Sippy sip
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #106 on: August 11, 2012, 07:16:27 am »
+11
current: Timeout
Texas: Timeout

Location: Australia!
Logged
Fammi un pompino!

I think I have ball cancer in my right nut :(
Good news everybody! It's not nut cancer :)
Bad news everybody, I got dumped :(

Offline HardRice

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 740
  • Infamy: 161
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: 187/Alligator
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #107 on: August 11, 2012, 07:28:09 am »
+1
rofl
Logged

Offline Ikaguia

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 8
  • Infamy: 1
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Smurfs_Kaisengr, ShintoRyu_MB
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #108 on: August 11, 2012, 07:28:42 am »
+5
current: 188 (210 in-game)
texas: 168

location: Brasilia(Brazil)
Logged

Offline Argoth

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 232
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Argoth
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #109 on: August 11, 2012, 09:50:47 am »
+4
current: 68 (around 72 ingame)

texas: 52

location: seattle currently, but when I go back to tucson it wont change


EDIT: screw the texas server, host one in either phoenix or tucson for us few arizonans
Logged

Offline Earthdforce

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 391
  • Infamy: 150
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Earth_Geodude_da_Defender, _RageThrower
  • IRC nick: Khalestimo#7613
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #110 on: August 11, 2012, 10:14:50 am »
+3
Quote from: Argoth on August 11, 2012, 09:50:47 am
current: 68 (around 72 ingame)

texas: 52

location: seattle currently, but when I go back to tucson it wont change


EDIT: screw the texas server, host one in either phoenix or tucson for us few arizonans
Tucson is like 13 hours from Dallas (at least it is from my house, last time I drove through there), shouldn't you have better ping?
Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Wallace_Ritchie

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 145
  • Infamy: 11
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Luk_Astralis, FatKidsAreHardToKidnap
  • IRC nick: Luk
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #111 on: August 11, 2012, 10:35:22 am »
+4
Current: 45

Texas: 89

Location: East Tennessee
Logged

Offline dreadnok

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 838
  • Infamy: 562
  • cRPG Player
  • fuck these jerkoff kids
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KBW<MB<SoW
  • Game nicks: Gorp_The_Gorger
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #112 on: August 11, 2012, 10:44:49 am »
+3


nj: 39

TX: 34
Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline paulinhopow

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 2
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #113 on: August 19, 2012, 09:23:15 pm »
+2
    Current: 152 ms

    Texas:    144ms


    Brazil - NE

    [url][http://www.alemdaimaginacao.com/Obituario%20da%20Fama/Charles_Bronson/Charles-Bronson1.jpg]
Logged

Offline Arathian

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 650
  • Infamy: 175
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Pick it up you white ass cracka
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Frisians
  • Game nicks: Arathian, schizophrenic_axe_murderer
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #114 on: August 19, 2012, 10:57:32 pm »
+2
Current
35 ms

New server: 55

Location: Montreal
Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline a_bear_irl

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 540
  • Infamy: 252
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #115 on: August 21, 2012, 09:28:29 pm »
+2
the results are clear, moving to texas will reduce the number of undesirable >80 pings and the pings that are increased will stay under that range, resulting in a more immersive gaming experience for all
Logged
FREE ALLERS

Offline jtobiasm

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 567
  • Infamy: 328
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Tobi
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #116 on: August 21, 2012, 10:01:17 pm »
+3
Leeds, England

Current : 108

Texas : 122
Logged

Offline Beat

  • Mighty
  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 71
  • Infamy: 3
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #117 on: August 21, 2012, 10:02:53 pm »
+2
Current: 40 (35-45 in game)

Texas: 32

Location: Atlanta
Logged

Offline SHinOCk

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 369
  • Infamy: 58
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Is that all you've got!?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: 1%
  • Game nicks: Occitan_SHinOCk, Occitan_Baz, Derp_In_A_Can, Disease_Infested_Cum_Bucket, The_Long_Dick_Of_The_Law
  • IRC nick: SHinOCk
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #118 on: August 21, 2012, 10:55:58 pm »
+3
Current: 37  (42 in game)

New: 58

Location: Québec

Logged
While you burn at the stake, i dance with the flames

Offline Kuyamzoleta

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 94
  • Infamy: 11
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Zoleta, WATCHOUT_SON
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #119 on: August 21, 2012, 11:49:30 pm »
+1
Current : 12 ms

Texas : 46 ms

Location : Chicago

The change won't make much of a difference to me, I'm all for it.
Logged
"twerk miley miley twerk"
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 13