Author Topic: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)  (Read 15943 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TiFFman

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 9
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: TiFFman_BRD, TiFFman_Unicorns, TiFFman_Cavalieres
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #60 on: August 09, 2012, 03:59:46 am »
+3
Current: 78 ms (Just about what i get ingame)

Texas: 51 ms

Location: Arizona

Offline BashirKhan

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 37
  • Infamy: 16
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #61 on: August 09, 2012, 04:08:44 am »
+3
Current - 44 ms

Texas - 33 ms

Location - Central Oklahoma

Offline JasonPastman

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 285
  • Infamy: 113
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Guys That CMP Has Quoted [GTCHQ]
  • Game nicks: Jason_The_Great
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #62 on: August 09, 2012, 04:09:22 am »
+3
Current 40,

Texas 68,

Mass.
If a majority be united by a common interest, the rights of the minority will be insecure - James Madison
It is not wisdom but Authority that makes a law - Thomas Hobbes.
Too busy not giving a fuck...
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Draeth

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 85
  • Infamy: 8
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Order of the Holy Guard (R.I.P.)
  • Game nicks: Draeth
  • IRC nick: Draeth
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #63 on: August 09, 2012, 04:10:12 am »
+3
Current: 36ms


Texas: 67ms


Location: Maryland
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Kelugarn

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 936
  • Infamy: 79
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • #̪͎̳̭̰͓͙ͯ͗̇͘ͅͅ1̢ͨ̈̆̓ͮ͐̌͏̪̦͓̣ ̽̇ͫ҉̸͕̻͙͖̮̹ͅN̡̥̭͖͙ͮ͊͡
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Free Peasants of Fisdnar
  • Game nicks: Froyo The Wizard
  • IRC nick: #FreeArys2012
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #64 on: August 09, 2012, 04:14:25 am »
+3
Current: 86ms
Texas: 64ms

Location: California (SF bay area)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Taser

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1447
  • Infamy: 82
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TKoV
  • Game nicks: Alfred_Taser_of_TKoV
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #65 on: August 09, 2012, 04:29:12 am »
+3
Current = 77 ms

Texas = 58 ms

Location: Cali
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline FrugFrug

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 493
  • Infamy: 59
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: MB Mascot
  • Game nicks: FrugFrug Owl_Beard
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #66 on: August 09, 2012, 04:50:06 am »
+5
ToD is a Karma giving machine.

Only reason I even took the time to post my pinghuehue

Offline TurmoilTom

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1089
  • Infamy: 166
  • cRPG Player
  • Doesn't really play that much anymore
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #67 on: August 09, 2012, 04:52:05 am »
+1
Only reason I even took the time to post my pinghuehue

Same.

Offline dynamike

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1212
  • Infamy: 187
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Let's be friends again?
    • View Profile
    • The Remnants Clan Website
  • Faction: Stratia
  • Game nicks: Remnant_dynamike
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #68 on: August 09, 2012, 05:04:18 am »
+3
Pinging 74.91.113.155 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 74.91.113.155: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=52
Reply from 74.91.113.155: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=52
Reply from 74.91.113.155: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=52
Reply from 74.91.113.155: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 74.91.113.155:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 36ms

C:\Users\dynamike>ping 64.31.0.187

Pinging 64.31.0.187 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.31.0.187: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=49
Reply from 64.31.0.187: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=49
Reply from 64.31.0.187: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=49
Reply from 64.31.0.187: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 64.31.0.187:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 53ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 56ms

Location: Long Island, New York
For while the fire in the heart of a single Remnant still burns... can Stratia truly have fallen?

Offline Dexxtaa

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1268
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Remnant_Dexxtaa
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #69 on: August 09, 2012, 05:07:10 am »
+4
Current: 21ms
Texas: 42ms
Location: Indianer

I used to get anywhere from 9-15 ping, but now it's hopped up :(
« Last Edit: August 09, 2012, 06:07:13 am by Dexxtaa »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Allers

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 292
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player
  • Ca$hville
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Ca$hville Records, Ruff Ryders
  • Game nicks: Allers, Young Buck, DMX
  • IRC nick: Allers
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #70 on: August 09, 2012, 05:19:36 am »
+2
Why tears +1ing every post
Ca$hville 615

Offline HardRice

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 740
  • Infamy: 161
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: 187/Alligator
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #71 on: August 09, 2012, 05:26:25 am »
+4
Why tears +1ing every post

Science!

Offline TurmoilTom

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1089
  • Infamy: 166
  • cRPG Player
  • Doesn't really play that much anymore
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #72 on: August 09, 2012, 05:37:48 am »
+3
Science!

I decided to help.

For science.

Offline Digglez

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 573
  • Infamy: 596
  • cRPG Player
  • YOU INCOMPETENT TOH'PAH!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Northmen
  • Game nicks: GotLander, Hamarr, Digglesan, Black_D34th
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #73 on: August 09, 2012, 05:44:18 am »
+2
current: 17ms
Texas: 35ms

Location: St. Louis, MO  (directly between Chicago & Dallas)


I"M FINE EITHER WAY, WOOT

Offline Life

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 763
  • Infamy: 281
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mod is dead.
  • Game nicks: Assassin_Life, Efil, iK_Life
Re: Comparing current to possible new NA server location (Ping test)
« Reply #74 on: August 09, 2012, 05:46:36 am »
+2
Current: 64 ms

Texas: 53 ms
<3 you meow. free catnip anytime (;
Assassin Video
My custom crosshair
visitors can't see pics , please register or login