The War Z

[Lordark]

l4d has its own porn. l4d is superior.

[Christo]

l4d has its own porn. l4d is superior.

Seriously?

...

Of course.. how could I forget Rule 34.

[Uumdi]

[Molly]

They have to change the name of the game and they knew about it since mid November

[Kafein]

From what I know of them, L4D and DayZ are not the same genre.

[Arrowblood]

Fuck this shit, ive bought Operation arrowhead and this shitty key is not working

[Kafein]

They have to change the name of the game and they knew about it since mid November

Why bother owning the name when you already earned the millions you wanted ?

[cmp]

If he earned the millions he wanted he wouldn't be posting in his forum trying to convince people it's not a scam.

[Kafein]

If he earned the millions he wanted he wouldn't be posting in his forum trying to convince people it's not a scam.

Well a few additional millions certainly don't hurt

[Carthan]

Cannot be unheard.....

[Uumdi]

Haha, anybody else see this?  Probly been like this for weeks, but i just saw today.


http://warzcentral.com/

gg

[tizzango]

Man, the shitty thing is that the game does look good- even if they did just port their War Inc. engine (or whatever the correct jargon is). The game looked less buggier than DayZ in terms of zombie mechanics and the player mechanics. In the videos of War Z, when you shot a player it instantly affected them and likewise with zombies, which is what DayZ lacked.

Sometimes you could shoot a player 5 times with a Lee Enfield and he would live, and other times shoot him once and he would die. Sometimes players would pass out for 10 seconds, sometimes 2 minutes and you had no way of telling. Sometimes you could empty a magazine into a player, and he could still get one shot off that would kill you before he died. In addition zombies took a delay upon death, so you would waste extra ammunition thinking they were still alive and not to mention they ran identically to the form light takes travelling down a fibre optic cable- zig zagging at 3 x 10 to the power of 8 meters per second.

I'm not saying the game /IS/ more playable (cause I haven't played it), but it certainly /LOOKS/ more playable than DayZ in the current stages they are in. I mean even with all the negative reception with this 'scam', those that have played War Z and DayZ, can you honestly say DayZ is more functional/less-buggy?

Please excuse the grammar i'm drunk!

[Uumdi]

It's playable, but there's nothing to do.  I've had fun with it, but I can have fun with a rubber band.  If you forget all the bullshit with the devs, my main critiques are:

1) Server hopping is shitty, there isn't enough incentive for roaming location to location, you can just find an out of the way spot to camp out and switch.     +++POSITIVE: There's a 10 second countdown on disconnect, so you can't alt+f4 out in panic.  ----NEGATIVE: YOU CAN'T CANCEL THE COUNTDOWN FOR SOME REASON, haha.  Had a guy, i heard his footsteps coming, i'm like oh god oh god cancel.  just watched him come up - i had the jump on him, he didnt notice me, and i watched him derp around for 6 seconds, turn around and shoot me, then instantly DCed.

2) 3rd person has a crosshair, but 1st person you need to use ironsights -- ???.  Fuckin nonsense.  Get rid of the crosshair entirely, or remove 3rd person entirely.

3) The noisemaking is awful.  Sidewalk is super loud, while the pavement on the street is 100% silent.  Dirt/grass is silent.  Rocks make metal-clanging noises.  For this being about 80% of the game, its pretty ridiculous.  That's excluding the bug where if you hit a wall or the ground with a hammer, about 1 in 5 times it makes a bullet ricochet sound which freaked the hell out of me till i got used to my friends bein dickheads

4) The dev shit...  Instead of being fixed, its probably going to hit the fan more and more by the day.

[Vibe]

Man, the shitty thing is that the game does look good- even if they did just port their War Inc. engine (or whatever the correct jargon is). The game looked less buggier than DayZ in terms of zombie mechanics and the player mechanics. In the videos of War Z, when you shot a player it instantly affected them and likewise with zombies, which is what DayZ lacked.

Sometimes you could shoot a player 5 times with a Lee Enfield and he would live, and other times shoot him once and he would die. Sometimes players would pass out for 10 seconds, sometimes 2 minutes and you had no way of telling. Sometimes you could empty a magazine into a player, and he could still get one shot off that would kill you before he died. In addition zombies took a delay upon death, so you would waste extra ammunition thinking they were still alive and not to mention they ran identically to the form light takes travelling down a fibre optic cable- zig zagging at 3 x 10 to the power of 8 meters per second.

I'm not saying the game /IS/ more playable (cause I haven't played it), but it certainly /LOOKS/ more playable than DayZ in the current stages they are in. I mean even with all the negative reception with this 'scam', those that have played War Z and DayZ, can you honestly say DayZ is more functional/less-buggy?

Please excuse the grammar i'm drunk!

They're pretty much at the same level when it comes to bugs/cheaters/hackers. But DayZ has more features, the world is MUCH larger, more depth, more everything. WarZ is just their previous bland shooter with zombies ducktaped to it. It's shallow compared to DayZ. And that's just the mod I'm talking about. DayZ Standalone... now that is something worth looking forward to.

[Uumdi]

Sucked it up and played WarZ with a couple guys tonight.


Its fuckin' awful.  Undeniably rushed so hard out of the ass that its covered in rectal blood.