First of all the Shogunaate clan itself isnt always historically correct ex. Georges
seen you guys running in transitional and mamluke mail, but thats fine it gives a clan and the whole game a nice diversity and enables players to express individuality and create their recognisable character. Dont tell me when you see a ghotic plate dude with a flamberge you instantly think it georges rite, and there are many examples. most of the "top" players have their own style and are recognised with or without banner. i think that is awesome.
What is the issue here it certanly isnt history its about one color. Pink
well business men wear pink shirts, hell even hooligans on the stands wear pink polo shirts, its a color get over it.
A bear on a pink flag is offensive ? A heart or a panda is offensive?
How about the Teutonic order banner, dont give me its a historical banner shit. we all know what that simbol means today and yet nobody minds the chocolate chip cookie shit, the dudes name is Ulrich_88 cmon...
lets make an indian clan and slap a cute puppy there and call it historically correct. bs.
I have nothing against improving the quality of the banners and if indeed some banners that dont meet the standards quality wise dont implement them and maybe suggest what changes should be made but the color is not a reason.
someone said he doesnt like seing ppl on the battlefield laying dead in pink, i bet he deslikes even more being poked or malleted by a guy in pink, dont you insecurities get the better of you
final thought: dont split the community this way there is always a way to talk it out and work together i belive its in everybodys interest to have only one banner pack and see everybody as the were ment to be seen.
cheers
p.s. cant wait to see how will kebapci banner look like if there will ever be one