Constant Delaying From ROHYPNOL

[Son Of Odin]

Yeah that one indeed

[ROHYPNOL]

plz just lock the thread.. this has been discussed b4.. they are not going to nerf just because 1 person

[Denam]

Rohypnol shot me in the face. Global ban is needed.

[Draggon]

Ban he!

[B3RS3RK]

I believe you mean miller high life, it is the champagne of beers after all.

Staropramen, motherfuckaaaaaaa!

[Turboflex]

I think people might be getting tired of the NA1 cavalry shitfest. Last night NA2 had 90-100 people, NA1 in the 60-80 range. I logged into NA1 at one point for a couple rounds and the only organized infantry group was ATS, there was at least 25 cav, prolly more around 30+. Funny enough Hospitaller was split on servers, their cav on NA1, but their infantry fled to NA2. I spawn late 1st round, Rohypnol and some other HX sitting in spawn picking off other lates (quality kills there). Meanwhile siege had 3-4 decent sized clan squads (5-10) playing together for hours.

If you want to actually melee in big melees, with some semblance of tactics, siege is the place to be. If you want to be backstabbed and kited by cheesy overpowered and obnoxious cavalry players, stay on NA1.

[CrazyCracka420]

Horse xbow is imo the best class to counter lance cav and roh is usually the last alive no matter what class he is

But really if you just ignore him and kill his team horse xbow is utterly useless

This!

A good horse xbow will destroy your teams lancer cavalry.  It's the best counter to lance cavalry IMO (one horse xbow won't stop 8 lancer cav, but he can consistently tear up horses, and if you're not blocking, the lancer). 

They aren't that great 1v20 when there's 20 infantry left, but that's not the horse xbow fault...and I've seen Roh 1v8 and win because the infantry kept chasing after him instead of hiding behind a tree and waiting for Master of the Flags to spawn.

He's not a delayer, stop bitching and crying about a perfectly valid, and useful class.

And turbo, siege was more popular because NA1 was down for a while last night.

I like battle servers because you have all classes, and the maps are much more balanced (for either side to have an equal chance to win).  Horses were on the battlefield in the period that we're playing the game from.  Sometimes cavalry are strong versus infantry, bitching about cavalry is like bitching about any class that is strong versus your class.

It's called MOUNT and Blade.  If you're organizing an army (for strategus say), for an open world battle, you're going to be bringing at least a 1/4 of your army as horsemen, otherwise you're a fool.  Why would you expect it to be any different on the battle servers?

[CrazyCracka420]

Drinking american beer would you even notice if you mixed em up?

There's lots and lots and lots of "micro" breweries in the states.  Mainstream American beer is pretty watered down, not very hoppy, and not very dark.  That being said, when I walk into the liquor store or any bar (even tiny little hick bars) there's always good beer I can buy, or good beer on tap.

Schells is my favorite brewery in MN, but the farther you get from Southwest Minnesota, the less available it becomes.

*EDIT* fuck meant to edit my previous post...but I doubleposted instead.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Sorry kitties

[Spleen]

NA just needs more Horsearchers

[Lt_Anders]

anders remember when i took you to duel server and won 10-0

Aye, You are WAY better at pure HC than I am. But I'm effective on foot and mounted whereas you loose out significantly when dismounted.

Also, I don't use a Champ Arabian, i use a rouncy. Duel me Rouncy versus rouncy and lets see how it goes then . I'm good versus the heavy horses and fast horses but bad versus the arabian(and desert if the rider is good)

also we dueled 3 times I was higher level, but you had your arabian and stuff already(level 23 i think?, while i was like level 28 or so)

(also, i'm probably the shitiest duelist you could find. But I do WAY better in siege and battle cause I'm better at picking my targets and engaging and disengaging at will. I probably will ALWAYS lose versus you as a HC, but you can't beat me on your lancer )

[Swaggart]

So much stupidity in this thread.

Rohypnol playing his horse crossbowman is fine. It's a threat. Threats make this game exciting. Stop bitching and get organized.

As for siege being the place to go for "tactics" yeah, as if its really hard to gather everyone to go one direction and overwhelm. I mean, the brilliance of this tactic makes me wonder why Sun Tzu didn't think of this shit before. A much greater example of tactics is organizing a team on battle and moving towards a objective that isn't as clearly defined as "go to the flag this way" or "block the path to the flag here." Tactics indeed.

[Turboflex]

Yeah right, in battle the team with the cav imbalance wins. If you have an infantry-heavy team no amount of tactics will save you on a flat, open map.

[Swaggart]

This coming from the clan that usually has a pikeman in their infantry formation?

Here's a tip, get the pikeman to watch your backs instead of trying to cheese melee kills.

[CrazyCracka420]

To me it seems the opposite, whichever team has the more organized (and better skilled) infantry groups seem to always win the battles.  Cavalry only picks on the weak links (aka people who are lone wolfs) or infantry groups engaged in combat.  Cavalry can't do shit against a group of infantry who are just standing there, not engaging other infantry.

[Goretooth]

This coming from the clan that usually has a pikeman in their infantry formation?

Here's a tip, get the pikeman to watch your backs instead of trying to cheese melee kills.

nice