more exp for retire

[_Tak_]

No because it will not be fair for players who is stuck in gen 1 or gen 16 as they cannot retire. Another solution: Keep gen 16 max cap, but increase exp 30 to 60 or something.

[Ninja_Khorin]

Would lead to faster leveling, making gold even more useless, meaning heirloom pricings go up.

Didn't read thread, so probably already been said, but...

How exactly? The amount of experience you get does not increase the amount of gold that's on the market. Faster levelling would imply more heirlooms on the market and reduced prices.

[Zandieer]

Personally, I think it's weird that the more you play, the faster you get shit. Personally, I'd accept +100 per gen or more what ever, but IF it would ONLY affect your pre lvl 30 xp gain. There shouldn't be XP bonus after lvl 30. Or, well, that's just my opinion.

-1 this post all you want

[Elindor]

It should be reversed...

Right now the more gens you have the faster it goes.  Meaning its easier for people with lots of gens/looms to get more gens/looms.

I would think it should be easier to gen your first couple times, and get harder and harder as you try to gain more and more gens/looms - this is the way most leveling/acquisition systems work....the higher you go, the more difficult/grindy it becomes.

Never really understood the current system.

[Rumblood]

Didn't read thread, so probably already been said, but...

How exactly? The amount of experience you get does not increase the amount of gold that's on the market. Faster levelling would imply more heirlooms on the market and reduced prices.

Kinda said that already you thread skipper! (quit yanking his shank joosto and Lech!)

No, heirlooms would become more prevalent, making their value go down and gold value go up as you need the gold to even be able to use those items with the upkeep. Opposite effect than what you are saying.