Author Topic: Make Palfrey not suck  (Read 1874 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tankmen

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 65
  • Infamy: 28
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Make Palfrey not suck
« Reply #15 on: May 22, 2012, 05:22:06 am »
+3
i take offense to this topic, i ride a palfrey, leave wilmur alone! he does just fine, he doesnt want your pity!
The purpose of wearing plate has become nothing more than crippling yourself to look like a knight... or maybe its my lack of athletics

Offline dodnet

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 595
  • Infamy: 149
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Wolpertinger
  • Game nicks: DoD, DoD_Wolper
Re: Make Palfrey not suck
« Reply #16 on: May 22, 2012, 04:56:14 pm »
+1
But I believe Wilmur wont say no to some special hay that makes him feel stronger or run faster!  :wink:
The logic of war seems to be that if a belligerent can fight he will fight.

(click to show/hide)

Offline Uumdi

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 651
  • Infamy: 59
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Ready to Die
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
  • Game nicks: Uumdi_of_Chaos
  • IRC nick: Uumdi
Re: Make Palfrey not suck
« Reply #17 on: May 23, 2012, 12:24:09 pm »
0
i take offense to this topic, i ride a palfrey, leave wilmur alone! he does just fine, he doesnt want your pity!

Wilmur is a pile of brown spotty nonsense.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Ten shots of prayers, ten shots a day
A shot of thrill to hide the pain.
They can`t win, they just don`t cry,
The troopers know they live to die.

Offline _Tak_

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 459
  • Infamy: 195
  • cRPG Player
  • Retired Dev of FI2
    • View Profile
    • mod :D
  • Game nicks: LC
Re: Make Palfrey not suck
« Reply #18 on: May 24, 2012, 04:28:36 pm »
+1
Perhaps making the palfrey cost the same as rouncey or make the palfrey skeleton model a bit lower so that they can dodge arrows easily. Since they are palfrey they should be the legendary small horses.

Offline _Tak_

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 459
  • Infamy: 195
  • cRPG Player
  • Retired Dev of FI2
    • View Profile
    • mod :D
  • Game nicks: LC
Re: Make Palfrey not suck
« Reply #19 on: June 07, 2012, 07:54:25 pm »
0
bump

Offline Penitent

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1389
  • Infamy: 220
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Penitent_Turtler
Re: Make Palfrey not suck
« Reply #20 on: June 07, 2012, 08:14:17 pm »
0
Palfrey really needs some improvement in SOME way...that is for sure.
It is redundant right now.

Offline bruce

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 262
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: the Freak Army of the Gnjus / Saracens
  • Game nicks: Saracen_el_Brus
Re: Make Palfrey not suck
« Reply #21 on: June 07, 2012, 10:32:47 pm »
0
If it were as cheap as the Rouncey, it would be almost ok. It would still be worse then the rouncey except one point more speed which is hardly worth the tradeoffs.

But a cheap man's horse... yes.

As it is, it is a waste of database space. Although, tbh, all you see, with reason, is rouncey/arabian/courser/destrier. The armoured horses make a showing now and then and have their place in clusterfuck maps. Rouncey is on the list because it's cheap and decentish. Courser is for running away, and arabian is the best lancer/HA/whatnot horse. Destrier for slashing & bumping, or if you hate arabian horses.


Best ban reason ever:
Quote from: Wookimonsta
I checked, the only Vagabond I found was Wolves_Vagabond_TheCruel, that guy is now unbanned. Ban reason was: "calling Zotte a cockswoggler".

Offline dodnet

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 595
  • Infamy: 149
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Wolpertinger
  • Game nicks: DoD, DoD_Wolper
Re: Make Palfrey not suck
« Reply #22 on: June 08, 2012, 09:55:37 am »
0
As it is, it is a waste of database space. Although, tbh, all you see, with reason, is rouncey/arabian/courser/destrier. The armoured horses make a showing now and then and have their place in clusterfuck maps. Rouncey is on the list because it's cheap and decentish. Courser is for running away, and arabian is the best lancer/HA/whatnot horse. Destrier for slashing & bumping, or if you hate arabian horses.

Same goes for desert horse and steppe horse. No one ever uses these. Maybe they should make it the same stats as rouncey/courser/arabian, so you can choose between two different styles and add more variety.
The logic of war seems to be that if a belligerent can fight he will fight.

(click to show/hide)

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: Make Palfrey not suck
« Reply #23 on: June 08, 2012, 10:51:28 am »
+1
Steppe horse is actually quite decent.

Offline OttomanSniper

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 175
  • Infamy: 97
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Greek_OttomanSniper Roof_Monkey
  • IRC nick: _Sniper
Re: Make Palfrey not suck
« Reply #24 on: June 08, 2012, 11:16:25 am »
+1
add more war animals, war elephant or war camel or war bear ?

this game need more color.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline _Tak_

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 459
  • Infamy: 195
  • cRPG Player
  • Retired Dev of FI2
    • View Profile
    • mod :D
  • Game nicks: LC
Re: Make Palfrey not suck
« Reply #25 on: June 09, 2012, 04:06:07 pm »
0
bump