Author Topic: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen  (Read 3703 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline AngryScotsman

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 1
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #15 on: March 03, 2011, 08:48:30 pm »
i didn't trashtalk him second time

so he is an admin and he can do whatever he wants and disappointing people and when someone has the balls to complain he can just say sorry it was a mistake ? what if it was anybody else who can't draw lights on the facts ? you get banned by a guy because he has problems with you and you just should sit here and wait that it ends ? or apologising or whatever ? i told him he was wrong, he said i was lying, what if i didn't take the time to take a screen of the logs ? this guys is a pain for crpg community, he doesn't deserve to be an admin

Totally playing devils advocate here to point out how fucked up the admin system is, but one your clan mates himself (who is an admin) said that admins don't need evidence. Anyone with any idea about what unchecked power does will call bullshit on that.

Offline Leiknir

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 81
  • Infamy: 14
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: Leiknir
  • IRC nick: Leiknir
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #16 on: March 03, 2011, 08:48:58 pm »
He banned you because he thought you teamkilled him, given the prior history there, revenge threats and everything. And you said yourself, you rushed him, killed him a good time before the "battle", so it really looked like a revenge teamkill from afar.
There are server logs for exactly such reasons, when you forget to take your safety screenshot, you will always find an admin who can double check for you.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline AngryScotsman

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 1
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #17 on: March 03, 2011, 08:51:49 pm »
He banned you because he thought you teamkilled him, given the prior history there, revenge threats and everything.
There are server logs for exactly such reasons, when you forget to take your safety screenshot, you will always find an admin who can double check for you.

And where's the admin who will double check for me Leiknir, or anyone? Any players word against an admin is worthless, not to mention this "get out of jail free card" bullshit policy of "admin's don't need evidence" and "common sense".

Let's not pretend the whole thing is impartial and fair now.

Offline LordBerenger

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1492
  • Infamy: 859
  • cRPG Player
  • Jesus is the savior of Earth
    • View Profile
    • .........
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #18 on: March 03, 2011, 08:53:22 pm »
So why should admins get special treatment?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline nuffen

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 113
  • Infamy: 114
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Nuffen Fallen_Lilith Fallen_Little_Nuff
  • IRC nick: nuffen
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #19 on: March 03, 2011, 08:53:53 pm »
 SCotsman: stop bullshitting. You've clearly stated your not accepting the rules. You should be in your right to tk whoever you want whenever you want. As you dont accept the rules, we dont accept you as a player.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline nuffen

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 113
  • Infamy: 114
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Nuffen Fallen_Lilith Fallen_Little_Nuff
  • IRC nick: nuffen
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #20 on: March 03, 2011, 08:54:28 pm »
So why should admins get special treatment?

Why are you defending tkers? Do you want to remove the part of the rules where intentional tk is forbidden?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Olwen

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 419
  • Infamy: 222
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • A shadow among others
    • View Profile
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #21 on: March 03, 2011, 08:54:57 pm »
if we do mistakes we are kicked, if we taunt people who have powers we get banned, if we complain we get muted, if admins do mistakes they just can apology ? no way

Why are you defending tkers? Do you want to remove the part of the rules where intentional tk is forbidden?

there you go, complaining, get threatened by admins

Offline Leiknir

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 81
  • Infamy: 14
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: Leiknir
  • IRC nick: Leiknir
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #22 on: March 03, 2011, 08:56:22 pm »
there you go, complaining, get threatened by admins

Where is the threat? That admins have enough of the bullshit and just let the kindergarten be kindergarten?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline AngryScotsman

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 1
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #23 on: March 03, 2011, 09:02:13 pm »
SCotsman: stop bullshitting. You've clearly stated your not accepting the rules. You should be in your right to tk whoever you want whenever you want. As you dont accept the rules, we dont accept you as a player.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


You can't count.

Oh and "common sense" tells you that at the end of the round means probably unintentional. I wonder how you'll bend the rules this time.

Notice how Mr Awesome, at the time of the incident that spiralled out of control to my banning, who is a complete third party to the incident, applied his "common sense" as well.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2011, 09:05:23 pm by AngryScotsman »

Offline LordBerenger

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1492
  • Infamy: 859
  • cRPG Player
  • Jesus is the savior of Earth
    • View Profile
    • .........
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #24 on: March 03, 2011, 09:04:04 pm »
I never openly defended tk'ers.

Silly me. I should have know that you love to act as ''Mr Knowitall''.

Shouldn't except more than that.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Olwen

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 419
  • Infamy: 222
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • A shadow among others
    • View Profile
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #25 on: March 03, 2011, 09:04:48 pm »
Where is the threat? That admins have enough of the bullshit and just let the kindergarten be kindergarten?

don't know how to read quotes ? try again

Offline nuffen

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 113
  • Infamy: 114
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Nuffen Fallen_Lilith Fallen_Little_Nuff
  • IRC nick: nuffen
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #26 on: March 03, 2011, 09:07:48 pm »
I never openly defended tk'ers.

Silly me. I should have know that you love to act as ''Mr Knowitall''.

Shouldn't except more than that.

No, you just openly defend them from being banned. Im an abuser in your eyes every time I ban someone who tk intentionally. Even if he openly admits it. ITs not me you got a problem with, its the rules.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline AngryScotsman

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 1
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #27 on: March 03, 2011, 09:10:10 pm »
No, you just openly defend them from being banned. Im an abuser in your eyes every time I ban someone who tk intentionally. Even if he openly admits it. ITs not me you got a problem with, its the rules.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


It's about the rules is it?

Offline LordBerenger

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1492
  • Infamy: 859
  • cRPG Player
  • Jesus is the savior of Earth
    • View Profile
    • .........
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #28 on: March 03, 2011, 09:15:26 pm »
Sure it actually is the rules i have problem with. +1 for that Lillith.

But hmm to be more specific which rules could it possibly be? Hmm?  :)

Could it perhaps be the rules that ''The Great Lillith'' comes up with all by himself?

Yeah it just got to be those rules. Eh Lillith?  :wink:

Not in this case however. This is just some classic abuse. Just wanted to answer your intelligent question.


Now keep going with typing bs to poor Olwen. Don't let me interfere anymore.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2011, 09:17:34 pm by CountBerenger »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline nuffen

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 113
  • Infamy: 114
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Nuffen Fallen_Lilith Fallen_Little_Nuff
  • IRC nick: nuffen
Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen
« Reply #29 on: March 03, 2011, 09:16:56 pm »
Im getting tired of this bullshit. I'm trying to help the communicty with enforcing the rules so people dont go on tking and other bullshit. This to let the majority enjoy the game without getting harassed by a small minority of raging trolls.
This Im doing on my own spare time, and Im using a lot of my playtime to do this. Im not getting paid you know. Im using a lot of time to make sure people get fair threatment, but some people, like olwen and scotsman insist on not having to follow the rules. Im not gonna waste more time on shit like this, and Im gonna ignore stupid discussions like this.

PS: If someone got SERIOUS feedback on my admining, please send me a pm.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login