Poll

Just added a pole Im fairly tolerent with msot things exept for spamming

Great Admin
8 (18.6%)
Acceptable Admin
8 (18.6%)
Bad Admin
22 (51.2%)
Friendly admin
5 (11.6%)

Total Members Voted: 43

Author Topic: [NA] Valdian  (Read 3381 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Valdian

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 63
  • Infamy: 65
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Astralis, Irish Band
  • IRC nick: Valdian
[NA] Valdian
« on: February 29, 2012, 09:35:43 am »
-1
So Im a Admin now so if anyone has any problems with my Decisions just let me know on here and we can maybe solve the problem. Do know that I will treat all clans and people Fairly and the same as I would my own clan.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2012, 05:40:36 pm by cmpxchg8b »

Offline isatis

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 624
  • Infamy: 78
  • cRPG Player
  • ink+water showing their true potential!
    • View Profile
    • le Clan des Cochons!
  • Faction: Le clan des Cochons!!
  • Game nicks: Cochon_Furtif_Isatis
  • IRC nick: Isatis
Re: NA Valdian
« Reply #1 on: February 29, 2012, 10:59:58 pm »
0
you are an admin??


need to play more often...
So the new response to ranged ragers is not "get a shield", it is "learn to chamber ranged nub!"
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Jacko

  • OKAM Developer
  • ***
  • Renown: 839
  • Infamy: 99
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • Mappers Guild
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fffnanguard!
  • Game nicks: Jacko
Re: NA Valdian
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2012, 01:51:53 am »
0
Too good for square brackets now, huh?
Monkeys!

Offline Valdian

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 63
  • Infamy: 65
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Astralis, Irish Band
  • IRC nick: Valdian
Re: NA Valdian
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2012, 08:06:42 pm »
0
Yes Ive wanted to be one for a long time now.

Offline oohillac

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 724
  • Infamy: 146
  • cRPG Player
  • boys don't cry
    • View Profile
Re: NA Valdian
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2012, 02:38:54 am »
0
Quite possibly one of the worst admins.  Freaks out at pointless stuff for no reason.

Example 1:  I was using Voicecommands, 4-5 in a row, and he kicked me from the server.  QMV function is there for a reason.  Then did not kick the other teammates using the voicecommands.

Example 2:  warned archers to "not fire into melee."  So what are they supposed to do?  Stand there?  Pfft.

Glad this "admin" does not play often.

Offline Troyicide

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 65
  • Infamy: 121
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: NA Valdian
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2012, 03:02:54 am »
0
Quite possibly one of the worst admins.  Freaks out at pointless stuff for no reason.

Example 1:  I was using Voicecommands, 4-5 in a row, and he kicked me from the server.  QMV function is there for a reason.  Then did not kick the other teammates using the voicecommands.

Example 2:  warned archers to "not fire into melee."  So what are they supposed to do?  Stand there?  Pfft.

Glad this "admin" does not play often.
couldnt agree more

Offline Aderyn

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 365
  • Infamy: 243
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Kalmar Union
  • Game nicks: Aderyn
Re: NA Valdian
« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2012, 10:21:56 am »
0
well spamming voicecommands is a kickable offence.

and about archers i'm sure he ment that people should take more caution. might of been someone shooting like a machinegun into melee without caring who got hit.
Can't spell manslaughter without laughter.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline TheFocusedOne

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 15
  • Infamy: 19
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: NA Valdian
« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2012, 05:07:03 am »
0
and about archers i'm sure he ment that people should take more caution. might of been someone shooting like a machinegun into melee without caring who got hit.

There is no way to be certain of that.  I'm all for judging each case as it pops up, but I do believe that admins should not be able to ad hoc rules on the fly.

Offline Count_Curtis

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 322
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player
  • There's no cure for being a cunt
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Captain_Ludd / Curtis
  • IRC nick: Curtis
Re: NA Valdian
« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2012, 03:11:10 am »
0
Shit admin.
Shooting into mele is not a rule. teamhitting is a rule, shooting into mele is not.

Shoot into mele, hit bad guys = good

Shoot into mele = hit good guys, kick/warn

Cool guy though. love you valdian
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Spanish

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 386
  • Infamy: 106
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 2h Cav Star of the year award winner.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The official Drama Llama of Knights_Hospitaller
  • Game nicks: Hospitaller_Spaniard, BowPersona, Span
Re: NA Valdian
« Reply #9 on: May 02, 2012, 09:27:11 pm »
0
Valdian needs a poll cuz all the cool admins have them
My horse is named pebbles and we like to try.

Offline Valdian

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 63
  • Infamy: 65
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Astralis, Irish Band
  • IRC nick: Valdian
Re: [NA] Valdian
« Reply #10 on: June 12, 2012, 03:16:32 am »
-1
just added a poll, Yes constantly spamming is kickable expecialy when your unable to see how many of your teammates fall and you cant see there names.

Archers firing into melee is not against the rules but 70% of archers cant hit there target in melee end up teamkilling everyone which is kickable or bannable with repeat offences.

Offline HardRice

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 740
  • Infamy: 161
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: 187/Alligator
Re: [NA] Valdian
« Reply #11 on: June 12, 2012, 11:38:17 am »
-1
Never seen valdian, ever. Not once, not even on forums. Who is this guy??  :?

Offline oprah_winfrey

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 808
  • Infamy: 196
  • cRPG Player
  • Now look under your seat...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: JABONRA
  • Game nicks: Egan
Re: [NA] Valdian
« Reply #12 on: June 12, 2012, 04:15:25 pm »
+1
Archers firing into melee is not against the rules but 70% of archers cant hit there target in melee end up teamkilling everyone which is kickable or bannable with repeat offences.

Where in the rules does it say that accidental tw/tk is kickable or bannable?

Offline Memento_Mori

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 187
  • Infamy: 32
  • cRPG Player
  • I use these forums to hook up with hot ladies
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Memento_Mori, Sengo_Muramasa, Born_Of_Osiris,
Re: [NA] Valdian
« Reply #13 on: June 12, 2012, 05:49:43 pm »
0
Where in the rules does it say that accidental tw/tk is kickable or bannable?

When you reach 5/5 on your TW report you get kicked, you can pretty much assume from this that REPEATEDLY 'accidentally' tw/tk will get you some attention from an Admin.

pretty much common sense that repeatedly tw/tk even on accident is going to warrant some attention.

Offline oprah_winfrey

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 808
  • Infamy: 196
  • cRPG Player
  • Now look under your seat...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: JABONRA
  • Game nicks: Egan
Re: [NA] Valdian
« Reply #14 on: June 12, 2012, 06:47:00 pm »
0
When you reach 5/5 on your TW report you get kicked, you can pretty much assume from this that REPEATEDLY 'accidentally' tw/tk will get you some attention from an Admin.

pretty much common sense that repeatedly tw/tk even on accident is going to warrant some attention.

As far as I can tell, the only thing that the reporting function does is punish players who accidentaly TW a lot, and if they reach the 5/5 mark they get punnished. You can't ban people for being bad.

And yet, that isn't even the same thing as telling archers to not fire into melee.