Author Topic: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account  (Read 1474 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tanken

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1463
  • Infamy: 395
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Tanken
Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« on: February 29, 2012, 04:54:24 am »
+3
Attached is a short-story summarizing the Defense of Mechin

(click to show/hide)


Really short battle, only about 270 vs. 260 if I remember right. To sum it up; HATE didn't have a lot of armor or weapons to use, and the Greens had just a little more than they did (but not a lot more by any means).
« Last Edit: February 29, 2012, 06:05:36 am by Tank Burner »
Below is a Collection of Finalists in my Design my Avatar contest -- They all did Awesome!
Thanks to all of those who contributed.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline reaperkiller

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 36
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
  • The bird of Hermes is my name Eating my Wings to
    • View Profile
  • Faction: make me Tame
  • Game nicks: Invictus Praetor
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #1 on: February 29, 2012, 04:57:58 am »
0
ummmmmm   tank  u might want to correct your historical account..  *cough*  we are not allied with the" reds of  south east"


just saying  other than that!!


fun battle :wink:
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! SOULS FOR THE SOUL EATER!! LET THE WORLD BURN!!!!!

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #2 on: February 29, 2012, 05:02:56 am »
0
heh, peasents, with shit gear, versus an armed army ;p. I'd say 110 tickets killed is good! Better for us, I need to lose my army. They was just steppe raiders who were run off their lands.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Darkkarma

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 573
  • Infamy: 106
  • cRPG Player
  • Slow your roll
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: DarkKarma
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #3 on: February 29, 2012, 05:13:46 am »
0
Glad we could be of service, anders!
This community hurts my brains, a lot.

Offline Tanken

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1463
  • Infamy: 395
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Tanken
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #4 on: February 29, 2012, 06:04:55 am »
0
heh, peasents, with shit gear, versus an armed army ;p. I'd say 110 tickets killed is good! Better for us, I need to lose my army. They was just steppe raiders who were run off their lands.

We didn't really have good gear either. Only had about 50 of everything that was decent, and that's all it really took.


PS...will correct the Alliance part, I thought since all of the Reds showed up for your battle and your title on Strat was red (or so I thought), you were Reds.
Below is a Collection of Finalists in my Design my Avatar contest -- They all did Awesome!
Thanks to all of those who contributed.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Hauptmann

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 55
  • Infamy: 5
  • cRPG Player
  • I love you.
    • View Profile
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #5 on: February 29, 2012, 06:24:11 am »
0
heh, peasents, with shit gear, versus an armed army ;p. I'd say 110 tickets killed is good! Better for us, I need to lose my army. They was just steppe raiders who were run off their lands.

Yeah, dude, don't misinform the populace of your folly. We were essentially equal in gear, aside from our slightly better shields.
Never again.

Offline Rikthor

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 432
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BOARD Clan
  • Game nicks: Historian_Rikthorrr
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #6 on: February 29, 2012, 02:05:17 pm »
0
Yeah, dude, don't misinform the populace of your folly. We were essentially equal in gear, aside from our slightly better shields.

Anders has never been the brightest crayon in the box, forgive him. Although give him some credit, he was the ONLY person on their team to not have a negative K/D.
Quote from: chadz
No matter how long you guys cry - I will not give in to dumbing strategus down because some people just want battles. If all you want are battles, then play cRPG, not strat. There are other people who like advanced gameplay.

Trolololololol

Offline dynamike

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1212
  • Infamy: 187
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Let's be friends again?
    • View Profile
    • The Remnants Clan Website
  • Faction: Stratia
  • Game nicks: Remnant_dynamike
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #7 on: February 29, 2012, 03:11:36 pm »
+3
heh, peasents, with shit gear, versus an armed army ;p.

You're right, we are very sorry for attacking you while you clearly were not prepared.

Waitaminute....  :shock:
For while the fire in the heart of a single Remnant still burns... can Stratia truly have fallen?

Offline ManOfWar

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 243
  • Infamy: 36
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • No crutches at all!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Remnants
  • Game nicks: Remnant_ManOfWar (Formerly Takeda)
  • IRC nick: ManOfWar
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #8 on: February 29, 2012, 04:24:16 pm »
+2
That is a zinger dynamike
Just a soldier

Offline Scrambles720

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 25
  • Infamy: 14
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Scrambles_Astralis
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #9 on: February 29, 2012, 05:00:06 pm »
0
In no way were we anywhere near equal in gear...

Offline Rikthor

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 432
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BOARD Clan
  • Game nicks: Historian_Rikthorrr
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #10 on: February 29, 2012, 06:21:06 pm »
0
In no way were we anywhere near equal in gear...

What were you using, we had peasant leather armor type of gear?
Quote from: chadz
No matter how long you guys cry - I will not give in to dumbing strategus down because some people just want battles. If all you want are battles, then play cRPG, not strat. There are other people who like advanced gameplay.

Trolololololol

Offline Ufthak

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 97
  • Infamy: 25
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #11 on: February 29, 2012, 06:27:36 pm »
0
HATE had sarranid leather armor, 28 body, CHAOS had studded, 30 body - the main difference came from weapons and shields, most weapons were retained, and explained the lopsided slaughter.

So, no, sorry, you didn't really do much damage as the armor values were about equal and the weapons weren't really lost. If not for that fact, though, you'd be dead-on. Some guy pretty much oneshotted me with a cudgel during the fight.

Offline Tanken

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1463
  • Infamy: 395
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Tanken
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #12 on: February 29, 2012, 11:14:04 pm »
0
Why is HATE bitching about Armor? lol. You guys ATTACKED. You could have PREPARED better.

'nuff said.
Below is a Collection of Finalists in my Design my Avatar contest -- They all did Awesome!
Thanks to all of those who contributed.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Penguin

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 670
  • Infamy: 121
  • cRPG Player
  • JesusChrist
    • View Profile
  • Faction: [A]rrows Incoming!
  • Game nicks: [Y]Retreat!
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #13 on: March 01, 2012, 12:27:46 am »
0
Why is HATE bitching about Armor? lol. You guys ATTACKED. You could have PREPARED better.

'nuff said.

I think they don't like you embellishing the story to make it seem like it was anything more than ill-equipped peasants vs knights in studded leather and strange gear. I find it funny and see the humor in the propaganda, people need to relax, it's all in good fun.
"As you gaze upon the cross, and long for conformity to him, be not weary or fearful because you cannot express in words what you seek. Ask him to plant the cross in your heart. Believe in him, the crucified and now living one, to dwell within you, and breathe his own mind there."

Offline reaperkiller

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 36
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
  • The bird of Hermes is my name Eating my Wings to
    • View Profile
  • Faction: make me Tame
  • Game nicks: Invictus Praetor
Re: Defense of Mechin -- A Historical Account
« Reply #14 on: March 01, 2012, 02:10:27 am »
0
Why is HATE bitching about Armor? lol. You guys ATTACKED. You could have PREPARED better.

'nuff said.


im not bitching... dont use plural terms!!  XD   


ps.    ufthak  ( i think i spelled it wrong.. sorry)    lol that was me with the cudgel  XD
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! SOULS FOR THE SOUL EATER!! LET THE WORLD BURN!!!!!