[EU Siege Mode] Recruit Admin(s) to Siege Mode servers.

[LordRichrich]

Yup, gotta say this would be nice
And hell, make some random guy admin. Tell the community that this guy is admin, keep him under close supervision for a while, see how he does, and if he fucks up you can choose another. Developing the mod is one side, managing it is another

[Bernard]

Why does people not play on siege? Its alot more fun than battle.

[karasu]

Anything is more fun than having to hide all the time, or looking at others play while being dead.

[karasu]

BUMP

[Ikarus]

Why does people not play on siege? Its alot more fun than battle.

Since the new patch they do; EU2 is often more populated than EU1, especially when Grey and their recruits are on it to maul their x5. If EU2 continues to be that stuffed, people should consider about rehosting a second siege server like EU5 was.

[karasu]

Since the new patch they do; EU2 is often more populated than EU1, especially when Grey and their recruits are on it to maul their x5. If EU2 continues to be that stuffed, people should consider about rehosting a second siege server like EU5 was.

Even before the patch it happened actually. Only on the periods from 1700 CET to 20 CET eu 1 server gets more players due to higher limit, and being eu 2 full.

[Leshma]

Reasons why I didn't play siege before are:

1) at one points repairs were too high
2) XP was low compared to battle (and multi was hard to obtain)
3) too many players who have no clue
4) kill/death ratio on siege didn't count

Now:

1) fixed, actually I pay less repair on siege
2) higher multi most of the time, with siege valor it's all up to you and easier to hold multi than on battle
3) numbers of those have decreased
4) score system will replace k/d completely, another win for siege

In next months, you can expect HUGE influx of battle players to siege because of all advantages it has over battle atm.

Siege also have way better maps (no abominations made by CA) and it has better balance than battle has these days.

No cav and archers aren't as nearly deadly as in battle, because nature of the game is different.

Koldborn, please lock this baby. More admins means less leechers to report and get additional multi and I don't like that

[karasu]

The server is itself already full most of the time (only 80 slots), with rarely any admins on it.

So, after almost 7 months of suggestion, and even being ninja locked some with the power to do it ( lul ) I think I'll leave it up until it dies of age (or rage).

There's always QML targets even with admins 

[Leshma]

Yeah, you're right. I've actually QMLed 3 leechers in a row while Random Douche was on

[Jarlek]

Most of the time when I play, siege is full. We need more siege servers.

[Leshma]

I think that siege could use 200 player limit way better than battle, only problem is performance loss in case of such great number of players in castles.

I haven't seen more than 120 players on battle in weeks. It has something to do with horrible battle maps.

DTV should get 60 slots, EU2 should get 120 slots, EU1 is fine with 120. EU4 needs to be fixed and patched ffs.

[karasu]

 

[Lech]

Siege also have way better maps (no abominations made by CA) and it has better balance than battle has these days.

Actually, in current siege mode, the maps are often shit (as is current one objective siege - shit - but better than battle. In many maps it's just camping the flag - as the maps themselves are poorly done). But yeah, with multiple respawns battle is way less random in terms of multi than battle (and you can reliably get valor, unlike battle).

[karasu]

 

[Moncho]

bmp