That is what the M key is for.
He's an administrator, which means something different to him than it does the others who share his rank (but, consequently, not his attitude). If you scan this thread, you'll find that he claims the mere privilege of authority is justification for its application, and that rules are not really a good means of determining who gets punished--his own intuition, augmented by nothing weaker than his own emotional stream of consciousness, is sufficient guidance for application of administrative discipline. If you don't trust his feelings to be fair and balanced, he will nevertheless disregard you and continue his clearly impartial repression and ask why you don't believe his actions to be just--nay, higher and more noble than mere virtue; for only EyeBeat, and EyeBeat alone, can both believe in rules and ignore them; both enforce rules impartially and selectively; both reject legalistic interpretations of law in favor of a higher moral authority and childishly cling to them as a defense. He transcends knowledge and truth! You will not find a more remarkable or public example of pure and blinding cognitive dissonance in this community. His black turns to white immediately but without seam or hint of gray; he swings the sword of justice to smite innocent and guilty alike in a single series of strokes, and with the same cool smile of indifference. He bears hypocrisy as a badge of honor upon his breast and denies its very presence! Who among us finds reason to query his motives? Not I; for I have glanced upon his countenance and fallen to the ground dazed, disarranged, disoriented. No man of woman born may digest his platitudes or discern his reason.
TL;DR: Why play by the rules when you believe yourself to be above them?
Discretion has no meaning.
Poll