Author Topic: Polearms and shields  (Read 625 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Spawny

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 152
  • Infamy: 27
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Templar_Spawny
Polearms and shields
« on: January 15, 2012, 10:27:13 am »
0
I know this has been suggested before, but now we have WSE it might actually be possible.

Please remove the damage/speed penalty for polearms used with a shield with 150 or less reach.

This would divide hoplites into 2 categories:
Fast stabby ones with shorter reach and long stabby ones with long reach and a bit slower.

This would make chosing the warspear over the ashwood pike an actual choice.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


The problem is even if you are number 1 in NA you are still only number 467 in EU or the worst in AUS(number 17)

Offline Zerran

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 276
  • Infamy: 48
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Caita_KUTT, Fellys_KUTT
Re: Polearms and shields
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2012, 11:38:20 am »
0
Removing it completely is a bit overkill. It should be reduced though.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Polearms and shields
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2012, 12:16:13 pm »
0
Wait, polearms with 150 length or less get the penalty? Isn't it the other way around? Would make a whole lot more sense. Longer weapon should be harder to use.

Offline Torben

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2011
  • Infamy: 352
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • still prepare to get sexed
    • View Profile
  • Faction: by my overly nerfed heavy lance.
Re: Polearms and shields
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2012, 12:20:23 pm »
0
Wait, polearms with 150 length or less get the penalty? Isn't it the other way around? Would make a whole lot more sense. Longer weapon should be harder to use.

all get the penalty atm
Yes, I know from whence I came! Discontented as a flame, Upon myself I live and glow. All I grasp like lightning flashes, All I leave behind is ashes
Flame I am - that much I know!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Polearms and shields
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2012, 01:00:21 pm »
0
lol he says that :D

and yes, +1 to your suggestion. Keep the long spear like ashwood pike for real polearmers that dont use a shield :)
Ah yes, I see now. I really thought there was a larger penalty for the +150 reach spears, but I am wrong on that?

That would be better than no penalty at all. A 97 red tassel spear would be horribly fast if the penalty gets removed altogether especially cause it also gets +50 length from the different stab animation.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2012, 01:01:32 pm by SgtTeeh »

Offline Spawny

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 152
  • Infamy: 27
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Templar_Spawny
Re: Polearms and shields
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2012, 04:58:34 pm »
0
Ah yes, I see now. I really thought there was a larger penalty for the +150 reach spears, but I am wrong on that?

That would be better than no penalty at all. A 97 red tassel spear would be horribly fast if the penalty gets removed altogether especially cause it also gets +50 length from the different stab animation.

Might keep the speed penalty, but at least remove the damage penalty.
Allthough speed wouldn't such a problem, as you still have just 1 attack direction.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


The problem is even if you are number 1 in NA you are still only number 467 in EU or the worst in AUS(number 17)