The huge nerff patch

[Arrowblood]

read before posting

[CrazyCracka420]

0 Pierce?  Tatars are better now. 

You'd rather have 4 cut damage than 0 pierce damage for an arrow? Do you normally shoot at naked people?  most of the people I see in game have armor on.  Pierce is way better than cut for arrows, even if you give up 4 damage (which is just in theory, against armored opponents Im' sure you'd do more damage with 0 pierce arrows than 4 cut arrows).

[Arrowblood]

pierce for high armor cut for lowarmor ,old story

[CrazyCracka420]

Obviously, and since you will go up against low and high armor opponents you'd think you'd want to come prepared for the worst case scenario.  I'd take pierce every day of the week if I was an archer, I'd be thanking the dev's for bringing back pierce damage to at least one arrow type.

[Turkhammer]

I have full lordly set and I welcome this change!

Nerfing armor were a must it was getting very tedious seeing people with pure Strength specs and Lordly Plate, not only does it not have a single thing to do with skills but it is also extremely idiotic in terms of game-play. Even on my self a lot of people have been bouncing hits that should really have went through, stupid.

Hopefully the battlefield will be more even now with the new changes.

More even.  That shouldn't be.  A real battle was not even.  What's the point of armor?  It should protect from arrows, and swords at least.  chadz should have wiped all money and started everyone over so that the plate wearers could not afford the armor all the time.