Author Topic: [EU] Thomek  (Read 55670 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline karasu

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1751
  • Infamy: 316
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • D̶͎̳͒́͗͋ẹ͕̲̠̳̄̃͂ͤ͑ͮṃ̮͎̗̦̏̿͊ͤi̥̪̼͕ͦ̀̊̐ȗ̘rͩ͋̅̊gͭ̿̋
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #270 on: October 02, 2012, 08:15:27 pm »
0
I've seen players lose admin status for way less.

Then again, he's one of the few active "with balls to act".
« Last Edit: October 02, 2012, 08:32:13 pm by karasu »

Offline Gnjus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1831
  • Infamy: 397
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Siktir git, pislik okçu.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Turklings
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #271 on: October 02, 2012, 08:15:30 pm »
-4
(in case you're delaying, which Thomek's victims have not be doing).

Quite an interesting statement, coming from a proven chocolate chip cookie worshiper.
Do you honestly think you have any sort of moral authority, Reyiz? Go genocide some more armenians and deny it ever happened, please, and stay in the middle east.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Zlisch_The_Butcher

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1272
  • Infamy: 971
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction: Frisian Church of Mork The Goat God
  • Game nicks: Zlisch
  • IRC nick: IRC nick: Tears
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #272 on: October 02, 2012, 08:16:58 pm »
+2
I don't enjoy the game sitting around for 10 minutes watching a HA/HX run around forever killing maybe 1 guy out of 20
Good thing rounds aren't 10 minutes then.
1H stab is the fastest, strongest and longest 1H animation. There's no reason NOT to use it in all instances. I don't know if it's OP, but it's boring. 1H used to be fun because you had a fast (left), long (right) and the most devastating attack (stab) and had to choose the best attack for each occasion.

Offline Zlisch_The_Butcher

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1272
  • Infamy: 971
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction: Frisian Church of Mork The Goat God
  • Game nicks: Zlisch
  • IRC nick: IRC nick: Tears
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #273 on: October 02, 2012, 08:18:41 pm »
+3
...coming from a proven chocolate chip cookie worshiper.
Quite an interesting statement, coming from a proven retard.
1H stab is the fastest, strongest and longest 1H animation. There's no reason NOT to use it in all instances. I don't know if it's OP, but it's boring. 1H used to be fun because you had a fast (left), long (right) and the most devastating attack (stab) and had to choose the best attack for each occasion.

Offline BlindGuy

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 996
  • Infamy: 583
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • De oppresso liber et plus ultra.
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #274 on: October 02, 2012, 08:23:33 pm »
+7
I got HX alt as far as all the community know...

But you fucking suck balls at it Cicero, no one is care when u delay cause we all on multis after stomping your team for 5 rounds.


NOW ON A SERIOUS NOTE

I have many screens of Thomek abusing his admin for example, being lanced like a tool for running off by himself like a ninja *what a joke, he makes no effort whatsoever to screen his movements, just runs off to the side, if he was any good at fighting HE would delay each round by randomly exploring map edges, but he dies to 1st horseman who sees him*

He then used admin chat to make the threat "Next guy who lances me gets a kick", next round he randomly ran off again, and again was lanced, in the same spot he was killed the last 5 rounds. True to his word, he kicked the player. He kicked a guy with his admin power for killing him...thats not abuse right? Anyway, I have screens of that and many more of his "amusements", hes a fucking menace, and when he joins the server you KNOW its gonna be "Everyone plays my way of fuck off" time untill he GTXs cause still after all this time he hasnt evolved his gameplay from what worked 2 fucking years ago.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2012, 08:31:37 pm by BlindGuy »
I don't know enough

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline SirCymro_Crusader

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1095
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #275 on: October 02, 2012, 08:26:03 pm »
+2
.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 07:21:20 pm by SirCymro_Crusader »

Offline Siiem

  • Heretic
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 611
  • Infamy: 129
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #276 on: October 02, 2012, 08:27:01 pm »
0
Quite an interesting statement, coming from a proven chocolate chip cookie worshiper.
Quite an interesting statement, coming from a proven retard.

These are both valid points. How they are relative to the subject of "Thomek abusing his admin powers" I disagree partly. Here's why, gentlemen... and karasu.

As one of these occurrences were containing a GK left as the last (I will use the term) 'pissmy old friend' alive, not even muhammed, Tor, Allah, Buddha or the mighty Zohan Dvir could have saved that round. If it's not obvious, yes it's sarcasm... even a marshmallow dipped in morphine could win that round.

As such, Wiltzu using this as a example is devoid of all reasoning and this whole thread = Svada.

« Last Edit: October 02, 2012, 08:30:45 pm by Siiem »

Offline Gnjus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1831
  • Infamy: 397
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Siktir git, pislik okçu.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Turklings
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #277 on: October 02, 2012, 08:29:14 pm »
0
Quite an interesting statement, coming from a proven retard.

Ouch, a bad-ass wannabe. Shall we count your posts trying to pull it off ?  :P
Do you honestly think you have any sort of moral authority, Reyiz? Go genocide some more armenians and deny it ever happened, please, and stay in the middle east.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 667
  • Infamy: 938
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #278 on: October 02, 2012, 08:29:45 pm »
0

Offline _GTX_

  • I <3 Shemaforash
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 535
  • Infamy: 960
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • O===((:::::::::::::::>
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmarunionen
  • Game nicks: GTX
  • IRC nick: GTX
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #279 on: October 02, 2012, 08:30:15 pm »
+2
Ouch, a bad-ass wannabe. Shall we count your posts trying to pull it off ?  :P

Plz keep it to the subject of the OP.

Edit: nvm leshma posted.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #280 on: October 02, 2012, 08:33:10 pm »
-6
It's a horsearcher fighting 20 enemies alone. That is not fighting and it's definitely not worth keeping a 100 people waiting.

Offline SirCymro_Crusader

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1095
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #281 on: October 02, 2012, 08:33:58 pm »
0
.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 07:21:17 pm by SirCymro_Crusader »

Offline Bjord

  • Amateur heretic
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1328
  • Infamy: 1109
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • salty turks
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #282 on: October 02, 2012, 08:35:39 pm »
+6
I confirm this, unjust kick and I had already hit him with 3 arrows on my STF HA alt, I was about to finish him off when Thomek steals my kill. :?

Anyway, this was a very bad call and I'm glad someone screened.

Faitly sure I lost that round to the kick. And I'm fairly sure Thomek was on the Ninja side.

So according to you, we should kick all players who happen to be last man standing, regardless if they're fighting back, solely on the grounds that they have no chance to affect the outcome of the round? Okay, let's save everyone the trouble and kick every Ninja from the get-go, they have no effect on the outcome anyway.

Seriously Khorin, if you're going to defend your master, at least provide better arguments. The bias reeks from your post.

I don't have anything personal against Thomek, but IMO, no matter how long you've been around, it does not grant you the right to interpet the rules in certain ways for the sake of your own convenience. I advise you to resign, it's the only right thing to do after what you did to Goztepe.
When you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares back.

Offline TurmoilTom

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1089
  • Infamy: 166
  • cRPG Player
  • Doesn't really play that much anymore
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #283 on: October 02, 2012, 08:35:54 pm »
+4
Neither is it delaying if he is fighting, and how do oyu know there are 20 the OP says 1 or 20, i count max 5 or 6 i can see

Top left of the screenies say there's 20 dudes.

But either way, it shouldn't matter. The dude who got kicked wasn't breaking any rules.

Offline Ninja_Khorin

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1067
  • Infamy: 90
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Zen
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Clan Ninja
  • Game nicks: Khorin/Keyoke/Lujan
  • IRC nick: Khorin
Re: [EU] Thomek
« Reply #284 on: October 02, 2012, 08:36:12 pm »
0
Neither is it delaying if he is fighting, and how do oyu know there are 20 the OP says 1 or 20, i count max 5 or 6 i can see
The screenshots shows it.