Author Topic: Fewer players now?  (Read 11081 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kong Ming

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 17
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
  • Strength is but only one aspect of power.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Eastern Tsardom
  • Game nicks: Barely_Legal, Anastasia, Hua_Xiong
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #30 on: January 31, 2011, 07:13:20 pm »
0
Fewer.  It's fewer.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Kung Fu Jesus

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 23
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #31 on: January 31, 2011, 07:23:07 pm »
0
Definitely fewer. The US can barely fill one server up, while the rest are at half or less. Used to be all full during evenings.
"My belt holds up my pants and my pants have belt loops that hold up the belt. What the fuckĀ’'s really going on down there? Who is the real hero?" - Mitch

Offline AgentQ

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 11
  • Infamy: 6
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #32 on: January 31, 2011, 07:28:59 pm »
0
YES, less players now, coz your troll has nerfed CAV, 2hand,archer... every class in this game.
Mission accomplished!

Offline Centurion

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 14
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #33 on: January 31, 2011, 07:47:20 pm »
0
Y'all are idiots. Patch  fucked up game. All the euros are on eu while the NA people are on NA very simple. Feel free to lag up NA whenever. More easy kills for me.

Offline Vexus

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 198
  • Infamy: 41
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Deus_Mortis
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #34 on: January 31, 2011, 07:52:44 pm »
0
Definitely fewer.

When the patch was still new on europe servers there was 3 servers full now you barely get one full in the morning and late night it rapidly goes down fast.

Offline verinen

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 7
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Verinen
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #35 on: January 31, 2011, 07:57:20 pm »
0
GTX because of the new patch, like DaveUKR.

1. I saw DaveUKR yesterday on some EU server... He is liar and showman.
2. Less people, because 40% of population were archers. After patch bows get nerfed, so- GTX of most archers.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2011, 08:03:26 pm by verinen »

Offline Heroin

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 135
  • Infamy: 32
  • cRPG Player
  • cRPG NA Server Admin
    • View Profile
  • Faction: MB
  • Game nicks: BlackHand_Heroin, Heroin_ATS, Heroin__JaBoNRA, Heroine_Heroin_MB, F8
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #36 on: January 31, 2011, 07:59:26 pm »
0
There are some things I liked about the patch, but I do attribute our loss of playerbase to people not liking it so much. Since the patch basically makes it so that only a small, select group of people can ever use sets of top-end gear, a lot of other people probably feel bitter/disappointed, and so they don't play as often.

Furthermore, unnecessarily high cost of wpf over 100 has made hybrids the flavor of the day, so everyone in the game has a ranged weapon. I think this could be fixed easily, not by nerfing anyone, but by bringing back the old cost of wpf. This would make being a specialist worth it again.

WPF cost wasn't the problem before anyhow. The problem before was with people who were generation 15, with 250 wpf from wpf retirement exploit, and level 42. Bring back old wpf costs to add more variety to builds! Vote YES for CHOICE!
Quote from: Godfrey of Ibelin
I once fought for two days with an arrow through my testicle.

Offline bruce

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 262
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: the Freak Army of the Gnjus / Saracens
  • Game nicks: Saracen_el_Brus
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #37 on: January 31, 2011, 08:00:26 pm »
0
Many retards have GTX crpg because:
- archery got nerfed
- omg I cant upkeep plate snipercrossbow flamberge bwaaah

Best ban reason ever:
Quote from: Wookimonsta
I checked, the only Vagabond I found was Wolves_Vagabond_TheCruel, that guy is now unbanned. Ban reason was: "calling Zotte a cockswoggler".

Offline verinen

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 7
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Verinen
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #38 on: January 31, 2011, 08:05:00 pm »
0
- archery got nerfed

Archery got fucked up.
I say this as 2h spammer. (really, I defend my old friend-chers).

Offline Gorath

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 226
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
  • Why the hell did I do anything other than ranged?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: The threat of physical violence should be present in all things
  • IRC nick: Otherwise we get a swarm of faggot children like the majority of the cRPG/Internet population
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #39 on: January 31, 2011, 08:30:17 pm »
0
Playerbase seems fine to me.  Anyone that was turned off by the patch to the point that they quit the game is a case of good riddance imo.

As for:
Mate, you might want to check a search engine of your choice for the meaning of the word, protip, it's not based on the nick chadz or whatever gives you that paranoid impression.

It's from Tribes ffs. 
And I should be nice or polite to anyone.... why exactly?

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #40 on: January 31, 2011, 08:46:32 pm »
0
Definitely less people on the servers, but that could be fewer people playing or just everyone plays less now or both.  I do know that half the fun for me now is just playing while on vent with my teammates with banner balance on (that change was main thing keeping me interested in game).  Kind of hoping the new strategus delivers and maybe we will see renewed participation, but right now its kind of a way to burn off steam for an hour if you are playing without clan members and then you get bored the repetitive nature of everyone being alike (thrower/2h, polearm spammer/thrower, 1h/xbowmen, all hybrids because wpf changes) and the same level and the decreased diversity makes it an entertaining arcade game but its lost a significant portion of its compelling nature, which is why people play less and the servers are emptier.  Just my 2 cents.

Oh yeah, wpf costs should be switched back, level cap and retirement wpf benefit removal is all you needed, as it is now hybrids are too heavily favored as only way you should go.
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline EponiCo

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 92
  • Infamy: 15
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild
  • Game nicks: Guard_Aine
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #41 on: January 31, 2011, 08:56:03 pm »
0
Gotta love strawmen.

Comparison:
In the old system the hybrid looses 35 wpf from his main and is at 82%, from his secondary he looses 80 wpf and is at 60% of max wpf.
In the new system he looses 28wpf from his main and is at 83%, from his secondary he looses 53 wpf and is at 69% of max wpf.
So, ok, that's the difference of 7, respectively 27 wpf, which according to your own statement is laughable.

But like bruce says, in the new system you also have to look at the price tag. In the old system the hybrid would just stack 2 snipers, steel bolts, tears and plate. (Eh, most people took sniper with them at 1 wpf...  :lol: )
In the new system the hybrid would just take one sniper and normal bolts, and will still have 18k less to spend on his melee gear.
This translates into weaker armor and/or heavier armor (armor wpf penalty...) and/or worse weapons (if you can find a weapon that is cheaper yet more effective, that's entire a problem of balance inside the category). Tradeoff is very much there (and I don't see anyone picking up a crossbow just for a few cheap shots).

Offline Oberyn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1578
  • Infamy: 538
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Frog
  • Game nicks: Oberyn
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #42 on: January 31, 2011, 08:56:55 pm »
0
You've said that before, and you're still wrong. What diversity was there before? Everyone grinded to get to use the exact same weapons, exact same builds, exact same armor. The diversity of all these things is much greater now.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Babelfish

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 62
  • Infamy: 27
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #43 on: January 31, 2011, 09:02:07 pm »
0
You've said that before, and you're still wrong. What diversity was there before? Everyone grinded to get to use the exact same weapons, exact same builds, exact same armor. The diversity of all these things is much greater now.

+100

Offline BD_Guard_Bane

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 6
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guards
  • Game nicks: BD_Guard_Bane
  • IRC nick: cmpxchg8b
Re: Less players now?
« Reply #44 on: January 31, 2011, 09:09:10 pm »
0
Before the patch cRPG was getting really boring. The only reason to keep playing was for Strategus.

I haven't played with the new patch much because of other stuff taking time, but when I did it was fun again - like the period just after one of the  database resets where plate was rare and people had different gear cos they weren't min-maxing to get the best stuff and character, mainly because they hadn't worked out the best stats/gear yet.

Even if the player base had dropped, who cares? The game is good again. If people want to play a grind game, they can play something else, it's no big loss.
I defended the village and all I got was this stupid title.