Warning to all strategus players

[Loki]

Learn from my mistake, don't sign up against your own battle. You will be banned.

[Tavuk_Bey]

ban all spies and saboteurs

[neupreis]

 

[Gheritarish le Loki]

you didn´t make a mistake, in fact you did what the whole clan of the guy who banned you did all the time in last strat.

Thats a shame, i hope eu will not become like na.

[Vibe]

I don't get it, why were you banned?

[Osiris]

i guess signing up for the village that your clan is attacking and either not turning up or Team killing so you clan gains an easy win is frowned upon? i dunno kinda makes sense tho right

[VVarlord]

I don't get it, why were you banned?

Learn from my mistake, don't sign up against your own battle. You will be banned.

[Gheritarish le Loki]

Osiris, this tactic was used and abused by searaiders, drz and their friends, the guy don´t show up and defenders are less numbers. This is a well known abuse.
So dev solution for this is to ban the guy without warning (and a clan leader i see).
This is fuckin bs, we all know drz have a lot of non taged members that can flood roster without notice (they did it to make chains of troops).
This mean some clans will have advantage and other will be banned...

[H4rdn3ssKill3r]

well now the admins are putting and end to that, its just not fun to have someone ruin a battle, like I joined you're battle and I started going around taking all the best stuff and tking then absurdly dropping the equipmen someplace, maybe for enemy team :/

[Elerion]

While I agree that this should be disallowed, I prefer rules enforcement to be consistent and transparent. In this case one person has been banned for doing something that has apparently been allowed in the past, without any previous warning or official rules announcement.

[Tears of Destiny]

While I agree that this should be disallowed, I prefer rules enforcement to be consistent and transparent. In this case one person has been banned for doing something that has apparently been allowed in the past, without any previous warning or official rules announcement.

Yup.
We have clean clear Pub Battle rules, we need them too for Strategus.

[Goretooth]

pathetic

[okiN]

While I agree that this should be disallowed, I prefer rules enforcement to be consistent and transparent. In this case one person has been banned for doing something that has apparently been allowed in the past, without any previous warning or official rules announcement.

- Strategus recruiting changed: every hour it hires applicants. Once hired, you can still be kicked out if the AI thinks there's a better applicant
- if you are not in the battle roster right before the game, don't give up - it kicks people out that have not been active right before the battle (like joining a server on using the website). This means you can still get in.
- the AI will remember your performance. If you do bad, your chances to get hired in the future sink drastically. At the same time, if you do good, you can ask for more money from the AI in the future.

- Sabotaging the AI is not allowed.

For the record, the ban was decided by chadz, not Leiknir.

[Zaharist]

Osiris, this tactic was used and abused by searaiders, drz and their friends, the guy don´t show up and defenders are less numbers. This is a well known abuse.
So dev solution for this is to ban the guy without warning (and a clan leader i see).
This is fuckin bs, we all know drz have a lot of non taged members that can flood roster without notice (they did it to make chains of troops).
This mean some clans will have advantage and other will be banned...

Boy, you know nothing 

[Osiris]

when you try to abuse an exploit crying that others did it or that it was ok to do before isnt really an excuse ^^ dont act like an asshole and you will never get banned