Author Topic: Polearms reach VS 2h  (Read 1832 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Fuma Kotaro

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 839
  • Infamy: 220
  • cRPG Player
  • I'm Fubadubbaduma
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Duck
  • Game nicks: Fuma + sth
  • IRC nick: sF_Leonidas
Re: Polearms reach VS 2h
« Reply #15 on: July 24, 2012, 08:36:59 pm »
+1
Actually 2handers are longer due to the holding but for balancing all this stuff out (lolstab,epic 2h reach, removed polestagger, thrust abilitiy (bigger disadvantage for pole than for 2h) we should make it a bit more realistic in real the poles are better to block because of their holding because you can stabilize the weapon on both sides because your hands are central 2handers cant do that because they are held just on one said so it should be harder to block with 2h also the swing speed of poles should be higher than the speed of 2h due to mentioned reasons
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Hobb

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 489
  • Infamy: 96
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TKoV
Re: Polearms reach VS 2h
« Reply #16 on: July 24, 2012, 08:37:39 pm »
+1
Pole arms the animation has you holding the middle of the weapon. Two-handed weapons the animation your holding the hilt, meaning 132 reach but your holding the center of the shaft while the katana user is holding the end.... but still if your being out reached by a katana with a pole axe something is wrong. Perhaps it was a Nodachii?

I am sure someone else could explain it with more details.

Offline Tibe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1335
  • Infamy: 287
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
Re: Polearms reach VS 2h
« Reply #17 on: July 24, 2012, 08:51:07 pm »
0
2h isn't op

It's just the only thing that hasn't been nerfed to the state of being underpowered.

Agreed. I never really felt like I was screwed when I faced a greatsword user vs me with 1h, nor have I ever felt OP when I used it. Its all skill. There is no point of nerfing gswords, cause than polearms whould be left OP and those whould be nerfed too. And if all that keeps going we will be fighting with sticks and actual nerfguns soon.

Offline ildist

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 414
  • Infamy: 56
  • cRPG Player
  • hehexd
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS, THE MATES
  • Game nicks: Ildist_of_Chaos
Re: Polearms reach VS 2h
« Reply #18 on: July 24, 2012, 08:54:12 pm »
0
be a true hero and right swing like rhaelys, only way to go for polearms m8
Malaclypse: now every time I eat them I think about her that girl's snatch
Malaclypse: it tortures me
That Guy: wat

Offline BlueKnight

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 983
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • If you run, you will only die tired...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
Re: Polearms reach VS 2h
« Reply #19 on: July 24, 2012, 09:07:42 pm »
0
(click to show/hide)

When you start with "IN REAL LIFE" please... Try it yourself or try looking for the info. Don't write bullshit because "you think so"
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Skyrim UI

Offline Piok

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 121
  • Infamy: 97
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Polearms reach VS 2h
« Reply #20 on: July 24, 2012, 09:18:32 pm »
0
Side swing reach differences between 2h and pole does not bother me.
But stab animation is different story. With such range bonus on 2h stab you have practically two weapons in one.
Very good (statwise) 4directional weapon + fast stabbing almost as lance long weapon.  And this is big+ on battlefield in tight group engagements.
Not to mention that 2handers have much better chance not to bounce on high angle hits, which is retarded cause pole arms have much wider angle when swinging left or right often hitting or glancing on somebody who is not in your vision field. So 2h are also spammer choice.

Offline Patoson

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 784
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
Re: Polearms reach VS 2h
« Reply #21 on: July 24, 2012, 09:23:09 pm »
+3
The very few times I've tried polearms, I realised it is harder than 2h.

Like I've said many times in the past, replace greatswords' (only) stab with polearms' - half-swording. Stabbing with a greatsword with the current animation is weird and OP.

Offline Zerran

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 276
  • Infamy: 48
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Caita_KUTT, Fellys_KUTT
Re: Polearms reach VS 2h
« Reply #22 on: July 24, 2012, 10:48:20 pm »
0
Yeah we don't need research to show 2h animations give reach bonuses, it's pretty obvious. But what do you expect? The grip of the 2h is at the base of the blade, the polearm near the middle. You want the bec to have the same reach as a nodachi? Lol. Two handers of the same length as a polearm will outreach it, yeah, as they should due to where the weapons are held. I don't know what you're trying to achieve here, besides wanting polearms to outreach 2hers no matter of where they're gripped. Please, you might want to "research" how different weapons should be held.

I was merely pointing out a game mechanic, no need to start getting all worked up. Should I have told him "No, Polearms and 2Hers have the same reach, you just don't know what you're talking about."?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Fuma Kotaro

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 839
  • Infamy: 220
  • cRPG Player
  • I'm Fubadubbaduma
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Duck
  • Game nicks: Fuma + sth
  • IRC nick: sF_Leonidas
Re: Polearms reach VS 2h
« Reply #23 on: July 24, 2012, 10:50:21 pm »
0
(click to show/hide)

When you start with "IN REAL LIFE" please... Try it yourself or try looking for the info. Don't write bullshit because "you think so"

ahh did you try it?

maybe ive chosen the wrong words but at least I know what  I mean
« Last Edit: July 25, 2012, 12:05:24 am by sF_Leonidas »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline sF_Guardian

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 738
  • Infamy: 254
  • cRPG Player
  • In honour of Pepe the kindest baguette
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Sad Hobo Guild, Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: Peso, Dondergod, Hobo_loves_Pepe, Ras_Putin_the_stronk, FrenchBow_le_tarlouze, Forrest_Trump...
  • IRC nick: Peso
Re: Polearms reach VS 2h
« Reply #24 on: July 24, 2012, 10:51:32 pm »
+1
Stop whining fats, I still can outreach and spam alot of Greatsworders with my MW Glaive of Doom and
LHB goes similarily, balance between Pole and 2H is pretty good atm, no reason to whine about it.
I don't want to give a feedback to molly neither i want to ban him,I wanted to give advise high authorities to take his admin rights.Panos you monkey wrench where would u put this topic enlighten me you cancer fuck.

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 609
  • Infamy: 2825
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Polearms reach VS 2h
« Reply #25 on: July 24, 2012, 11:00:32 pm »
+1
It would be ideal if there was new 2H thrust animation, long enough to be on par with poleaxe thrust length. That would be balanced imo.

Offline Fuma Kotaro

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 839
  • Infamy: 220
  • cRPG Player
  • I'm Fubadubbaduma
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Duck
  • Game nicks: Fuma + sth
  • IRC nick: sF_Leonidas
Re: Polearms reach VS 2h
« Reply #26 on: July 24, 2012, 11:37:50 pm »
+1
Stop whining fats, I still can outreach and spam alot of Greatsworders with my MW Glaive of Doom and
LHB goes similarily, balance between Pole and 2H is pretty good atm, no reason to whine about it.

xD glaive spammer this seems to be the most op weapon with the gayswords
visitors can't see pics , please register or login