Author Topic: Internal poleaxe balance  (Read 8184 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #105 on: April 04, 2012, 07:49:10 am »
+2
nerf glaive

Offline v/onMega

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 234
  • Infamy: 67
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Bearzantium
  • Game nicks: Byzantium_vMega
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #106 on: April 04, 2012, 09:53:31 am »
0
what?

this is not about making elegant better then poelaxe, its more about getting the elegant out of it's clear inferiority. it has superior pricing and is top polearm but it inferior to other poelarm, is that so hard to understand?

Obviously for some ppl. it is.
Everybody who s not braindamaged knows that you are right....the other half is the ppl. you try to explain things to.


About those statistics...
Wait a little, I just play GermanPA for one gen now.

It will reach 5 % soon...^^

Offline Lactose_the_intolerant

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 460
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Byzantium the intolerant, lactose_the_...
    • View Profile
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #107 on: April 09, 2012, 09:31:02 pm »
0
bump for justiceeeeee  8-)

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1209
  • Infamy: 1437
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #108 on: June 16, 2012, 01:27:19 pm »
0
I think it's time to revive this topic.

I wasn't for it before when poleaxe was super OP with polestagger and spin thrust but now when poleaxe is nothing special, elegant version really does seem like shit.

Please buff it.

Offline BlackMilk

  • Polearm Lover
  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 370
  • Infamy: 144
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: el_Banduri
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #109 on: June 16, 2012, 01:31:31 pm »
0
I think it's time to revive this topic.

I wasn't for it before when poleaxe was super OP with polestagger and spin thrust but now when poleaxe is nothing special, elegant version really does seem like shit.

Please buff it.
You mean you weren't for it before when you were a twohander? :wink:

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 572
  • Infamy: 741
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #110 on: June 16, 2012, 01:34:09 pm »
0
I'm still twohander. I just don't like to play OP shit class, never did.

Offline Kato

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 227
  • Infamy: 37
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #111 on: June 16, 2012, 01:40:59 pm »
0
With turn stab nerf all shorter spears become shit compared to axes or poleaxes.
Now without polestagger little buff for blunt damage on swingable spears would be nice.

Offline Zlisch_The_Butcher

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1272
  • Infamy: 971
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Faction: Frisian Church of Mork The Goat God
  • Game nicks: Zlisch
  • IRC nick: IRC nick: Tears
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #112 on: June 16, 2012, 04:30:20 pm »
+1
I just don't like to play OP shit class.
Then why'd you become a danish greatsworder?
1H stab is the fastest, strongest and longest 1H animation. There's no reason NOT to use it in all instances. I don't know if it's OP, but it's boring. 1H used to be fun because you had a fast (left), long (right) and the most devastating attack (stab) and had to choose the best attack for each occasion.

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #113 on: June 16, 2012, 04:50:12 pm »
0
I think it's time to revive this topic.

I wasn't for it before when poleaxe was super OP with polestagger and spin thrust but now when poleaxe is nothing special, elegant version really does seem like shit.

Please buff it.

This, a million times.

As an owner of a +3 Elegant Poleaxe, I feel even more screwed since the recent updates.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline Sultan Eren

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 217
  • Infamy: 113
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercs
  • Game nicks: Sultan Eren
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #114 on: June 16, 2012, 04:57:04 pm »
0
Poleaxes are fine expect double hit stun.

Glaives OP, too fast.

Long spear and pike, turn-thrust must be removed, i think it's already done in this patch.

Shorter spears for hoplites should be buffed.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Offline Rebelyell

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 398
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Bobby
  • IRC nick: boobby
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #115 on: June 16, 2012, 05:09:36 pm »
+1
with no stun there is nothing op in that weapons
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Hey, I just met you,
And this is crazy,
You just killed me
Nerf you maybe?

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #116 on: June 16, 2012, 05:48:41 pm »
0
The regular poleaxe, with it's 31p stab and range, perhaps.

However, the Elegant is just teribad when compared to the other 2 poleaxes.

That 93 speed when masterworked? Doesn't do a damn thing, believe me.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline gazda

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 483
  • Infamy: 124
  • cRPG Player
  • Its almost harvesting season.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Saracens
  • Game nicks: Gazda_the_Swine
  • IRC nick: gazda
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #117 on: June 16, 2012, 05:51:47 pm »
0
is there an item balance thread that doesnt have leshma in it   :?:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile

Offline Hunter_the_Honourable

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 229
  • Infamy: 178
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Killing fairy riders for the good of cRPG.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Anti-fairy riders.
Re: Internal poleaxe balance
« Reply #119 on: June 16, 2012, 09:53:51 pm »
0
Personally I think the normal poleaxe is fine, fully loomed it

Stats:
Requirement:17 strength
Weight:3.4
Slots:2
Upkeep:1,012 gold
Speed:90
Length:141
Thrust:33 pierce
Swing:43 cut

I don't use any other poleaxe so I can't comment on them, however I can say that although the stats say 90 speed a non-loomed Glaive is faster, and no its not because they have more WPF it is just faster, I don't think the poleaxes need a nerf now seeing as polestun was taken away so there's no reason for a nerf and if you don't like the damage it does well then IMO tough shit, its a fully loomed one and Iv put time into getting these stats if you don't like it wear more armor.

I think the elegant poleaxe is fine but I haven't used it and stats never tell you the full story but from looking at the stats it seems ok but in game its probably really shit.

Normal
Requirement:16 strength               
Weight:2.8               
Slots:2
Speed:92
Length:132
Thrust:26 pierce
Swing:39 cut

+3 loomed
Weight:3.0           
Slots:2
Speed:92
Length:132
Thrust:28 pierce
Swing:42 cut

all in all I think both are fine.
How can you trust People?
They are Humans
I never trust Humans.