Messages

1

Scheduling / Re: NA Event Server Bookings

« on: August 24, 2014, 09:20:33 pm »

[Event/Tournament abbreviation] OCNA 3s
[Teams involved] Cockmeat Vs Internet Knights
[Date & time] Tuesday, August 26st @ 09:00pm Eastern

2

Official cRPG 3v3 NA Tournament / Looking for Scrim

« on: July 23, 2014, 03:22:45 am »

Cockmeat is looking for a team to scrim. 8pm Est on Friday. Anyone interested?

3

Diplomacy / Re: Attacked again is Raven's neutral area?

« on: September 04, 2013, 11:23:33 pm »

I can confirm via 2 different Raven members reports that Chesty never left our lands. Was he going to? I have no idea.

I agree he never left as we discuseed, it was the fact that he was west of all your fiefs and the only reason to be there was to be leaving your lands and to head to the steppes. Not trying to justify attacking in your lands which we should not have done, just calling out some of the BS being spewed.

4

Diplomacy / Re: Attacked again is Raven's neutral area?

« on: September 04, 2013, 11:18:30 pm »

One correction - chesty never actually entered hospitaller lands - the only one who entered was me from ravens lands and I went straight to ichamur.  No one made aggression and then "retreated" into their lands.  he took a  bunch of my gear to get me down to 0 crates after he had already sold all his goods in and then started heading back to our lands without ever leaving ravens territory.

Well thats clearly not true considering when we attacked Chesty he was west of all Raven fiefs, meaning that either he was coming from the the steppes or heading to the steppes.

5

Faction Halls / Re: [AoW] Art of War (NA)

« on: April 29, 2013, 09:33:41 pm »

Man doesn't it really suck when a faction accuses you off getting outside help for all your hard work on Strat..... *Cough* *cough*

6

Faction Halls / Re: Lost Legion Recruiting Na

« on: April 13, 2013, 11:14:35 pm »

The Wizard reporting in!

7

Faction Halls / Re: Lost Legion Recruiting Na

« on: April 10, 2013, 04:46:12 am »

I just thought of posting this, but in many recent strategus battles the teamspeak's consensus is that Slim carries a good portion of his team on his brawny shoulders.

I agree too, motherfucker is a nasty shielder.

So you can imagine how much it hurts my back carrying Slim

8

Diplomacy / Re: Lost Legion are swines and unprofessional

« on: March 10, 2013, 05:14:27 am »

  I know you guys are pissed off.

We're not so pissed off about not getting the castle and FCC getting involved, more so by the fact that your members are shit talking us on forums as if they kicked our ass.

9

Diplomacy / Re: Lost Legion are swines and unprofessional

« on: March 10, 2013, 04:35:21 am »

Second of all, I still personally disagree, it can either be called a stalemate or a close victory for Teutonics, they didn't lose any of the sieges and I'm pretty sure they have the highest amount of wins total.

So 1500 men attacking a castle and killing 1800-1900 twice, isn't a victory? News to me

10

Diplomacy / Re: Lost Legion are swines and unprofessional

« on: March 10, 2013, 04:25:23 am »

I think you guys are getting just as cocky as the Teutonics are, that last siege wasn't a victory and I personally don't consider that a complete victory for the entire war.

Now, if someone wants to dig up all of the battles that went down between Teutonic and LL and figure out who had the most victories, we'll be able to safely say who won the actual LL vs Teutonic war.

If it was anyones fight..... why did FCC get involved?

11

Diplomacy / Re: Lost Legion are swines and unprofessional

« on: March 10, 2013, 01:09:41 am »

I don't get why people keep saying that LL beat Teutonics, they didn't win any of their sieges and it looked pretty bleak after the last one regardless of FCC jumping in.

It wasn't looking that bleak, considering we had 3K more men to send at the castle full and ready for the siege, we we're going positive K/D on attack, we were on the verge of taking the castle on the last siege if it weren't for spell casting. We were almost certain to take the castle next wave if it were not for FCC intervention.

12

Diplomacy / Re: Lost Legion are swines and unprofessional

« on: March 10, 2013, 01:02:29 am »

LL had months of preparation, wearing full plate that-they-totally-got-by-themselves-not-hospitalers-promise and warring without warning, declaration or provocation a faction that was beaten to a pulp almost a month ago.

Stop saying plate armour, as was said before, we had just over 1000 sets of transitional armour for around 7K men, the bulk of the armour we used as in 5K sets had one more body armour than your white surcoat, and also you had a castle to sit in. So yea we cleary had the unfair advantage.

13

Diplomacy / Re: Lost Legion are swines and unprofessional

« on: March 06, 2013, 02:26:09 am »

Well stop giving LL 2349173971301 million worth of gear then! JEEZE GUYS!

That number was oddly specific...... Who is the spy!?!

14

Diplomacy / Re: Lost Legion are swines and unprofessional

« on: March 06, 2013, 02:03:49 am »

Guys, cut the crap.

You didn't get ALL THIS PLATE all by yourselves. This is rediculous. We are talking about 5000 heavy plate armor that each costs 300 gold. And that is just the breastplates.

Not to mention the warhorses and all the rest of the crap.

Well i'm not sure where your getting the number 5000 from, we had around 1K sets of heavy armour for all our armies combined. The vast majority of our armour was heraldic mail.....

15

Diplomacy / Re: Lost Legion are swines and unprofessional

« on: March 05, 2013, 02:56:00 am »

I wanna see that smug face when we wipe you out of the face of NA and send you to a vacation in the EU.

I think saying "We" is giving you guys way too much credit...