1
General / Re: OKAM - Potential giveaway? Anyone interested?
« on: July 03, 2016, 12:27:42 am »Quote
Maybe we should organise a charity to buy each Donkey a copy of OKAM.Save them from this harm if you want my opinion !
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
2
General / Re: Watch out!
« on: June 06, 2016, 01:26:13 pm »
Can you go to sleep and take golem with ya please ?
3
General / Re: Absurd idea for revenue
« on: June 03, 2016, 11:59:38 pm »
well, until now you had my respect
4
General / Re: The Epic
« on: June 03, 2016, 05:15:59 pm »Quote
Sounds like Life is Feudal.
Sound like my gf
5
General / Re: The Epic
« on: June 02, 2016, 10:35:58 pm »Quote
Of course if you were there you could take out the low priced ingots and perhaps trade them for bales of wool or something. The idea is that you don't have to sit watching the market prices and finding buyers. You can leave a 'family member' in charge with his simple instructions while you mount up and patrol the Southern Forest where you heard a bunch of noobs were harassing the local woodcutters.
So as much as we'd like to be dealing with real people for every detail, not many people would want to play 'shopkeeper simulator', and you won't always be on at the same time as the people you want to deal with.
Summarize so much my feelings.
Quote
That is pretty much spot on - which is also why one of the first gameplay features after Early Access will be from the top down, not bottom up - aka meaningful battles. We'll let you know more about that part soon.That's the best way to go for sure but... so many questions, you know what, I ll wait !
7
General / Re: The Epic
« on: June 01, 2016, 05:20:20 pm »Quote
What's the point of NPCs then?That's the main question. Who's gonna make lemonade ?
8
General / Re: The Epic
« on: May 28, 2016, 07:16:33 pm »Quote
To switch characters within your family, I think you should have to park the guy you are on in a safe place- your house, a garrison or an inn. An explorer could have a tent, but would be vulnerable- all part of the dangers.
That's some nice input bryggan, Parking your guy seems like a good way to go but then he doesnt "work" for you...
I think that one great opportunity with the game was to be able to gain ingame street cred while offline if you did things smartly (like placing your family members in the right places) and this would also add to the global population without a cost. The main flaw of the actual sandbox games is the limit of population... this would have been a way to avoid it a bit.
But hé, it's better without any bot in the game, I agree 4 sure.
I am really starving for more informations ;D. That's a good point I guess.
9
General / Re: The Epic
« on: May 28, 2016, 02:37:37 pm »No, bots will not play a major role in the game (if at all, combatwise), exactly for the reasons stated by Bryggan, but also for design reasons - we want to have a game that relies heavily on players, bots should play only the role of helpers.
Thanks for the reply chadz, one question stays open still. What are your family members doing when you are not controlling them ? just wonderin
10
General / Re: The Epic
« on: May 27, 2016, 10:30:36 am »Quote
What is there to answer then if you have all the answers in the other thread?Things evolve during a full year ?
11
General / Re: The Epic
« on: May 27, 2016, 02:04:03 am »
well then just don't talk about it all along, what's the point ?!
I am just trying to understand what they want to do. I remember the very first thread about the subject, when they decided to turn the game into a massive experience. It was way more documented and this in comparison is just a blank page. Merely trying to put back pieces of the puzzle here. They don't want to make promises ? well don't ! It's not like they are Blizzard !
I am just trying to understand what they want to do. I remember the very first thread about the subject, when they decided to turn the game into a massive experience. It was way more documented and this in comparison is just a blank page. Merely trying to put back pieces of the puzzle here. They don't want to make promises ? well don't ! It's not like they are Blizzard !
12
General / Re: The Epic
« on: May 27, 2016, 01:57:20 am »Quote
Yeah mate, you're asking about Epic, but that's far in the future, the task the devs have at hand right now is polishing combat, everything else should come second. But I bet that, if you get an avatar someone will answer you sooner or later. It's all about making your question prominent, do some funky colours. Or put a spoiler in your post, that's bound to attract attention.
Isn't the name of the topic : "Epic", and aren't we talking about it in a theoretical way ?
AM following your advice hombre, *finger crossed*
13
General / Re: The Epic
« on: May 26, 2016, 11:39:15 pm »
SO their plan is to answer questions exclusivly in a forum only visible for people who, they know, are already buying the game whatever happens ?
Not sure this is the perfect strategy, only my opinion...
Not sure this is the perfect strategy, only my opinion...
14
General / Re: The Epic
« on: May 26, 2016, 01:32:13 pm »
Here is a perfect exemple of how a Topic can turn all godwin when devs do not answers any fcking question.
15
General / Re: Of Kings and Men Gameplay Test, Monday, 23rd of May, 8pm UK time
« on: May 24, 2016, 04:39:50 pm »Quote
yeah, we're discussing it internally atm.Wow can't resist the excitement. I have chills all over my body
Pages: [1] 2