1
Events & Tournaments / Re: NA DUEL TOURNAMENT 4/30/16
« on: April 01, 2016, 08:42:29 pm »
Player name: Vape_Milem_of_Naish
Contact info: Vape Naish Embassy
Contact info: Vape Naish Embassy
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Diplomacy / Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy War
« on: February 21, 2016, 12:00:37 am »
https://youtu.be/ezvBs9SYxIY?t=380
Go to 6:20, that's how I feel about Kesh's intervention in the war.
Go to 6:20, that's how I feel about Kesh's intervention in the war.
3
Diplomacy / Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy War
« on: February 20, 2016, 03:39:13 pm »
I sum tymes wandr houu peopl lyve en tis wurld nowin tat peep lyk u exist.
Den i relize peple dunt care bowtt my old friendots. I men rlly wo took the photo?
y du i exist?
Den i relize peple dunt care bowtt my old friendots. I men rlly wo took the photo?
y du i exist?
6
Diplomacy / Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy War
« on: February 18, 2016, 07:48:42 pm »
TBH if you are really into it nords could have the best due to bows and any shielder would be boned against them. But if you want dank meme's then cav w/ spears.
Also bias because I enjoy that entire nordic persona.
Also bias because I enjoy that entire nordic persona.
7
Diplomacy / Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy War
« on: February 18, 2016, 05:09:05 pm »What the fuck is a tinadel..................
It's a dank meme.
8
Diplomacy / Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy War
« on: February 18, 2016, 04:48:23 pm »It's a character from an anime.
I too am an anime.
9
Diplomacy / Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy War
« on: February 18, 2016, 04:40:22 pm »What the fuck is a tinadel..................
It's basically a NA gaming community, they are pretty good. I think they started on PW but don't quote me on that.
10
Diplomacy / Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy War
« on: February 18, 2016, 04:34:10 pm »I saw like 6 13k guys on yesterday for the first time in over a year i was wondering what was going on.
I'm pretty sure they are tinadels that just got into strat.
11
Diplomacy / Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy War
« on: February 18, 2016, 04:29:15 pm »He's fighting for his claim. You literally just agreed with Bryggan saying that a claim is a claim and you should be willing to fight for it but yet you say the opposite with your words.
Are you illiterate or just plain stupid?
He is kinda illiterate due to his lack of proper use of english as seen hereof above. #Banter
12
Diplomacy / Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy War
« on: February 18, 2016, 02:37:42 pm »I think I'm missing something in this thread.
I thought Calradian Confederacy had a load of members, why don't they just take Dhirim (either from AI or Brotherhood) and also take all the Brotherhood's nearby villages whilst they're at it?
We are currently discussing our plans of actions in response to war being declared on us. It will take us some time to initial discuss what is the best course of action at this point not only for us but our allies. Inevitably the clan well wait to see how this unfolds before taking drastic precautions.
I am not a senior member and I only have started strat recently so don't take my word to a heartfelt meaning it's just my opinion and overall analysis of the situation. Same going for the upstairs post.
13
Diplomacy / Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy War
« on: February 18, 2016, 02:18:50 pm »TLDR
I can see though most of the members of that clan already shit talking me and spreading lies and slander and other bullshit when i came to them in all honestly and offered so much in return for only 1 thing......Dhirim which i though was agreed upon but whatever I'm done reading lies and betrayals and all that.
If you aren't going to read the response of your arrogant war please take down the thread
Betrayal? We even discussed attacking Dhirim for you after that foul play, yet you send one of your goons to delay Tristan (which was utterly destroyed) so that you could snipe the city without our consent. If it was in your's and our best interests then you should have discussed this issue diplomatically without basically shaming us saying in a basic sense that we needed you to succeeded. Claiming that many other people were going to attack us spreading lies in deceit within our own ts. Even after our battle at Dhirim that we pulled out to save its numbers you claimed to be apologetic. Saying that your words were not meant to harm or demean us yet they claimed that "I could take this town easy, but I simply don't trust Tristian." Then you come in our ts, telling our members to stfu so that you could tell us BS.
This entire war was caused by your failed attempt to use ruse tactics to deceive us. So that you could make your faction prosperous and weakening us. This post in general was your attempt to save your claims in Dhirim trying to make us look bad so that you could scramble all the factions you can to support you.
"You can't win the war, the bullshit is eternal." -BurghUK
14
Diplomacy / Re: Brotherhood vs Confederacy War
« on: February 18, 2016, 05:00:13 am »yes but as you can see by my family tree tristan has a claim via bloodline on dhirim and the surrounding fiefs from his great-great-grandfathers de jure claim
I'm going to +1 this due to my marriage ties and our alliance to support each other in defensive wars.
Hail Trump.
Pages: [1]