Messages

1

General Discussion / Re: Arys' cRPG Ranking List

« on: March 21, 2019, 07:25:48 pm »

The ole' SHADOW STRIKE!

2

General Discussion / Re: Arys' cRPG Ranking List

« on: March 21, 2019, 07:18:00 pm »

Seems more accurate and is exactly what I would expect from "Arys the F Tier"

3

Diplomacy / Re: I wish you good fortune in the wars to come

« on: March 14, 2019, 04:03:11 pm »

That's too bad it was a good post...announcing the news that everyone already knew was coming, because it comes every strat.  Like he said, they're at war with HoC, again.

4

General Discussion / Re: 4th of July Week Long Heirloom Point Flash Sale!

« on: July 06, 2018, 01:16:29 am »

http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=marketplacetrade&id=813627
SENT

5

General Discussion / Re: free zottlmarsch

« on: November 21, 2017, 08:42:17 pm »

He's unmuted now. I'd still advise him to either take his beef with Professor into private messages or improve his attitude.

A side note - not sure if you have noticed, but no one besides him seems to have such poor complaints, given how his thread died out as he was the only one pushing it. Constructive criticism is welcome, criticism used to hide your butthurt is gonna be made fun of. The level ranges are being changed soon anyway, so his point will be moot for even more reasons.

I only deleted your goodbye post to allow you shameless return with no need to retract your goodbye post, thank me later you cunt

I hope one day you will wisen up to see the irony of your stance on that whole debacle. until then, thanks for listening to reason, i guess. Looks like my work here is done for the time being.

6

General Discussion / Re: free zottlmarsch

« on: November 21, 2017, 07:15:32 pm »

"For crying out loud do they not know how to just not click on his thread if they don't like what he has to say or how he says it?"

THats what Im saying!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


theyre acting like they were forced to read it, rofl.

Just like how it was frustrating trying to have a conversation with Jona without him being snarky or snide. (perhaps not the exact right adjectives, but something along those lines)

So by getting yourself frustrated you go and justify permabanning someone from here? classic dev move.

7

General Discussion / Re: free zottlmarsch

« on: November 21, 2017, 06:15:10 pm »

Why do you keep saying justice for Jona when he isn't banned?

He is the devs just didn't give him the public shaming or w.e. it is they typically do.

Havelle recieved his justice, he was banned like 20 times in one day for ban avoiding months ago and we simply forgot to extend his permban to forums.

Jona is free to relay his ideas to professor on discord in real-time chat, and that's all I have to say about this.

when in the past have ingame bans extended to the forums? basically never. Im sure jona wouldnt even bother discussing the game with anyone on the dev team realtime or not. trying to have an intelligent debate with inept devs would prove as frustrating in any medium. you realize there is plenty more the this forum other than one topic, right? permabanned from the whole forums for saying the devs made a bad design choice, fucked up commie eurotrash decisions as always.

8

General Discussion / Re: free zottlmarsch

« on: November 21, 2017, 04:46:23 pm »

Glad to see this come to a reasonable conclusion.

Now, what about justice for my mans jona and havelle?

9

General Discussion / Re: free zottlmarsch

« on: November 20, 2017, 04:38:00 pm »

(click to show/hide)

I really can't differ from the two situations, what makes one bannable while the other one doesn't? Apart from James being in the dev team of course.


Why have you been deleting posts btw? Genuine question.

I hope you can undo this, restore some of your credibility and the devs and the community can move forward to make a real revival of cRPG.

"Explain to me why Zottl is banned from the forum and how it makes sense. "

Same reason why havelle and jona are banned as well, the eurocuck's ass is still sore after getting rammed by so much muslim dick on the reg that then when havelle zottl or jona came in with some ass whooping it pushed the pansy over the edge and he dropped the ban hammer on them without a second thought. had to preserve his precious safe space even if it meant making up all his own rules and punishments. time to get someone who isnt a cuck to moderate the forums. also rofl, "he is banned on the forums but not in the game for committing a game related offense." fucking rofl, how idiotic can someone be? if he was banned from the game then so be it, he 'broke the rules' and whatnot. but being banned on the forums for something related to the game? loool.

10

General Discussion / Re: free zottlmarsch

« on: November 19, 2017, 08:45:35 pm »

So these new devs permaban people because they said they sold looms for cash, and have a few transactions where they gave them away (coulda been for free, ain't illegal to give gifts here) and yet they've got a dev who actually offers money up for looms? Nice.

#Neverforget

http://forum.melee.org/diplomacy/this-is-not-fair/msg1176570/#msg1176570

11

Diplomacy / Re: HoC BUYING MERCS OFF ROSTER TO SECURE THEIR SHIT EXISTENCE

« on: November 21, 2013, 05:43:32 am »

Dude it's pretty mutch whatever at this point. HoC does not cry about our losses. Nor did we ridicule you. You LITERALLY blamed your loss on our walls. You bragged that without walls you won; seemed like no one really had fun on either side because of an atrocious map. That's not your fault, and it's not mine, it just was. According to my information Firebus was expecting pay from you. Yeah, we paid Desire, she friggin deserves it. We won't tell a merc who to fight for, and we usually don't pay for mercs, but we did, and we won because of much more than those mercs, and you screwed up Daruvian, and you lost. Get over it.

12

Diplomacy / Re: HoC BUYING MERCS OFF ROSTER TO SECURE THEIR SHIT EXISTENCE

« on: November 21, 2013, 05:16:22 am »

They are mercenaries. They fight for money. It's true, look it up. The mercs we hired were on your roster because YOU paid them. We did not attempt to steal them, but rather decided to seek out a few extremely talented MERCENARIES to fight for us. They already had an incentive to fight for you, with that incentive being money, so we offered more. THAT is called bidding.  You can look that up too; you'll find it, I promise. We did nothing wrong. I'm sorry if you didn't like it, but we were as much within our rights to pay players as you were, no matter the terms of the reward.  We won the siege because our men fought well and our command was superior. You Gobblins knew you were attacking a castle; blaming your failure to capture Almerra on the presence of WALLS is a little pathetic really. I do not know what you expected, but you will not just waltz into our home, one of the most well-built castles in NA and our choice of home for a reason, and take it from us while only spending 4,000 men...1,800 of which we now control due to your failure to plan an effective siege. Perhaps you are too used to walking into poorly-defended villages with thousands of men in endless plate to plan for a REAL siege, but if you wish to take Almerra from us, you're going to have to go big or go home. And based on today, you may just want to go home.

13

Diplomacy / Re: FCC & Hosp NAP

« on: October 23, 2013, 04:09:08 am »

Peace is always good news. Rejoice, and props to both sides for their good-humor!  Take note, for this is how it should be done.

14

Diplomacy / Re: War of Northern Aggression

« on: October 23, 2013, 03:35:18 am »

In reply to your counter-post Canary, I can appreciate you speaking up for your faction, for that is only what I am doing. I do not mean to bash you or Choas (except for Shik...fuck him) because I genuinely like Chaos most every day.  But as you must defend your House I must defend mine, and I do not think we deserve bashing based on what we have done. I do not think you to be completely detached from Chaos, nor doi think you incompetent, nor do I claim responsibility for Desire's attack, it is just that Desire said she was acting independently in that instance. I will say however that indeed, I know Shik got his army from you, and the next, and give you no thanks for doing so because of what he did to me. Of course I remember you commanding, you may remember some of the advice I gave from time to time during that battle because after leading so many sieges myself, I do not think anyone knows the castle better. I retract my more personal attacks after your explanation and in fact am glad we could come to more of an understanding; after all, I only flew off the handle because I felt insulted first. But as I said, HoC has never been attacked at Almerra, though we have done much fighting elsewhere, and it is through no fault of ours.  Now, if we shall call the issue resolved, I would be glad, for as Matey pointed out, it is not my drama post.

15

Diplomacy / Re: War of Northern Aggression

« on: October 23, 2013, 01:01:37 am »

I did not know you joined the Gobblins. My mistake and apologies. But saying 1:1.4 is nowhere near 1:1? Come now. I say if you were smart you WOULDN'T adopt an aggressive defense, for as you said, I should 'be thankful' you do. This is a ridiculous conversation. My armies went against an inactive fief to provide enjoyment to the community and to establish ourselves once more, and here you are, shit posting us for it. We haven't been so unsuccessful. That's all I was saying, and to think otherwise is silly. I offered no insult to anyone, but rather defended my clan's honor that that of my allies. I'll never understand where this hatred for HoC comes from, not will I attempt to convince a bunch of asshats to believe anything contrary to it if they won't, but I will not take it idly. As attackers against a particularly difficult castle to siege against opponents both far bigger and with vastly more resources we have done pretty damn well. I think your evidence, Phantasmal, proves that more than anything else. Considering our disadvantages an unbiased onlooker might actually praise what we have attempted to do and our performance. I see no reason for you all to be so condescending and hateful. What have I done to you to make you so damn hostile? Or are you that miserable and trollish that you must attack HoC and anyone else you can in any way possible at every possible opportunity? I do not accuse, but ask.