Messages

1

General Discussion / Re: Free loomz

« on: November 23, 2013, 10:02:08 pm »

i dont want to be a vulture but if you insist i could use a lp  gl in life (wise of you quitting, not fun but wise)

(click to show/hide)

http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=marketplacetrade&id=535590

2

Game Balance Discussion / Re: Possible reason to buff archery

« on: June 12, 2013, 06:38:18 am »

Bro, you just need +3 bow and arrows. I could borrow you some through armoury if you applied to Nordmen. Just so you can borrow items and try the game from other perspective. If you want to know any details or anything just PM me, also people on crpg forum are stubborn&hard like dicksteeldonkey. We have similar topics for over 2 years all the time based on the same shit. Anyway, this mod is pretty much addictive so I guess leaving it may be better for your health but you may also miss a lot of fun, especially once you meet some 'cewl' guys, the game becomes good.

You are right. When somebody sais 'I'm quitting the mod' that most likely means 'I'll be back after a couple of days'.

cRPG is a curse 

3

Game Balance Discussion / Re: Possible reason to buff archery

« on: June 11, 2013, 08:21:37 pm »

OK, I will stop shitposting now.

Reading all of your replies makes me realise that the problem here is me. I guess the game doesn't interest me enough anymore as it has evolved into what it is and I shouldn't try to change it. Sorry for wasting your time. Time for me to move on to another game. Thanks, bye.

Also, close this thread or rather remove it.

4

Game Balance Discussion / Re: Possible reason to buff archery

« on: June 11, 2013, 07:32:04 pm »

Thanks everybody for the discussion. I want to rectify some things about my post because I've thought over the matter some more.

Buffing archers won't do any good here, I realised.

I meant to say something along the lines of: The objective in battle is too unclear, many people do not necessarily think for the good of the team but for themselves first and it would be  much more interesting if players play for the win rather than having a good killing spree before dying.

Yes, I am a hypocrite

5

Game Balance Discussion / Possible reason to buff archery

« on: June 11, 2013, 08:24:26 am »

Disclaimer: The following material is based solely on my speculations and perceptions.

What I percieve while playing battle mode:

- Most archers don't use priority targetting (instead of going for dangerous melee 2 handers or polearmers they rather shoot peasants/archers/other ranged classes presumably because they can't hurt the heavy armoured melee classes enough to make a difference.)

=> The heavy armoured non-shielder players can roam around unsuppressed early game, enough to close distance to the enemy infantry and start swinging. Since these players are the most effective vs infantry they will mostly come out on top in the main fight. I only mention the main fight here because it is often all that decides the outcome of the battle.

I think this is also why 2h is often portrayed as an OP class, simply because they don't/can't get suppressed good enough by their natural counter: the archer.

I know this is a controversial topic but I'm just trying to contribute, and of course I ask for your thoughts on the subject. 

Note: there are always exceptional players like some archers that can completely annihilate armies but this post is about average players.

6

Suggestions Corner / Re: Torch 2h mode

« on: June 11, 2013, 06:55:37 am »

Please do the same for sickle 

7

General Discussion / Re: Ur little friend

« on: June 11, 2013, 06:40:16 am »

sickle, which I would like to get buffed