Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Nintendo

Pages: [1]
1
Global / Re: Spamming Inbox on c-rpg.net
« on: April 03, 2014, 07:57:58 pm »
Btw how stupid answer ; dont read messages.

Relax chichero, he does sort off have a point there...

2
Global / Re: Spamming Inbox on c-rpg.net
« on: April 03, 2014, 06:26:09 pm »
if you are here to mock with me you are in the wrong neighborhood.

Which neighborhood would suit you better?

3
Global / Re: Spamming Inbox on c-rpg.net
« on: April 03, 2014, 05:12:10 pm »
If its no against the rules i am gonna add all the crpg players and type a message every 5mins or whatever it will give me permission to do it.

So you report someone for doing it, but if it wasn't against the rules you would be doing that yourself?
Isn't that like... Hypocritical or something?

4
General Discussion / Re: Random question of the week
« on: April 03, 2014, 05:09:53 pm »
Okay, I was there thinking, but how did actual medieval elite knights/commanders and generals survived battles back in medieval era?
Lol take for example in crpg no matter how strong you are, one round you will get hit and killed, not talking about some random flying arrow.
So the big question is how. Luck? Very strong plate armor?

Imagine being in middle of something like this
(click to show/hide)

Well the picture shows the answer.
As others were fighting and died, while he was posing for the heroic picture.

5
Global / Re: Spamming Inbox on c-rpg.net
« on: April 03, 2014, 05:05:39 pm »
demand ; ask, want, request, ask for, wish .

Yea spamming 98 people with pictures is acknowledged as moronic.

No one actually agreed with it yet so it's not really acknowledged mate.

6
Global / Re: Spamming Inbox on c-rpg.net
« on: April 03, 2014, 04:17:11 pm »
Starting a ban request with "I just want to get rid of retarted moron Kalmars"

Awesome.

I demand

Cicero demands, and thy shall listen!

7
Game Admin Feedback / Re: Thomek
« on: March 28, 2014, 10:40:28 pm »
mad cuz bad(min)  8-)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


If you're going to start banning people on assumptions, maybe we can start banning, you know, actual cheaters (which you can easily detect).  Like the people modifying their game files so arrows are bright pink, or pikes are neon orange.  Or removing hay stacks, and bushes (or leaves on trees) from the game?  Or removing fog from their client?

There's lots of things that you can crack down on and find actual cheaters, but people are going to start getting banned based on assumptions and accusations?  Talk about terrible administrating.

Would destroy the playerbase, not something yo ucan afford while working on a new game  :wink:

8
Game Admin Feedback / Re: Thomek
« on: March 28, 2014, 10:29:00 pm »
Do I need to post logs? Prove to us with video of your hand, like you told,  that you are not using macros.

Then you will be unbanned asap.

@Nordwolf. Macros are cheating in the way he might be using them. If of course he is using them.

Mad cuz got owned ay?  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


9
Diplomacy / Re: War on Apostates
« on: September 13, 2013, 08:06:41 pm »
 :!:

10
General Discussion / Re: Lottery Lördag Announcements
« on: July 18, 2012, 09:21:50 am »
Lala bumping sticky thread

Pages: [1]